Hillary Clinton - GOP has plans to literally steal 2024 election
- Thread starter Arjuna
- Start date
Paxal
.223 Rem
When is she gonna go away?
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
So what she is really saying, is the Dems are going to literally steal the election.
ManrisFrack
.223 Rem
It's worse than just accusing the "Right-wing extremists," of planning to steal the 2024 election. She's trying to gaslight America into believing the electoral processes set forth in the Constitution are actually theft/unfair/etc., etc.
The Constitution gives power over administering elections specifically to state legislators, NOT state courts. The NC supreme court tried to override the districts set by the state legislature and implement districts drawn by their chosen 'experts'; clearly an unconstitutional and egregious overstep by the NC supreme court. Yet another instance of dems trying to accuse the right of the impropriety that the dems are actually committing when they get caught with their hands in the cookie jar.
The Constitution gives power over administering elections specifically to state legislators, NOT state courts. The NC supreme court tried to override the districts set by the state legislature and implement districts drawn by their chosen 'experts'; clearly an unconstitutional and egregious overstep by the NC supreme court. Yet another instance of dems trying to accuse the right of the impropriety that the dems are actually committing when they get caught with their hands in the cookie jar.
Bigfoot
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Clinton is projecting.
So you support gerrymandering?
Didn't New York just get their hand slapped BY A COURT for trying to do the very same thing?
pjzwtl
.308 Win
Poor woman… longing for relevance and it’s always just beyond her grasp… eh fuck her
spat
.700 Nitro Express
When the guy who's in charge of hell while she's up here goes on vacation.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
The constitution says the legislature gets to control how the electors are selected.
All 50 states have chosen to conduct a popular vote for their electors, but that isn't a requirement.
The legislature could literally just decree that their sitting congressmen get to pick one elector each and no election is needed and it would be perfectly constitutional.
I believe it means when they loose big time, the doubt seed has been planted to give them an excuse for not representing America.
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Hilary who?
ManrisFrack
.223 Rem
I said no such thing. Gerrymandering sucks but I haven't heard of a good alternative for drawing representative districts that is more resistant to manipulation. Static districts will become under or over representative as the population shifts.
I'm not aware of the NY case but it might be reasonable for a court to rule on the validity of the districts. However, it is my understanding that the NC court invalidated the gerrymandering done by the legislature, and then appointed "experts" (i.e. Democrats) to redraw the districts. The court re-gerrymandered the districts because they didn't like the gerrymandered districts produced by the legislature.
Would you rather the legislature draws the lines or would you rather have a court pick a few "experts" to draw the lines? It isn't perfect, but I think there are more opportunities for check and balance if the legislature does it.
Well, she would be an experienced expert on the subject.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
Simple.
There are many excellent computer algorithms for dividing up maps like that.
One algorithm for all districts everywhere. The only input is geography and population figures.
No human input into it at all.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
No, she couldn't even get that right.
She can fix democratic primaries, but in general elections she blew it.
RedBreast21
.223 Rem
Well, accuse the other side for what you plan to do in 2024. No surprise here. She still hasn't publicly conceded 2016.
Last edited:
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Not even with your dick.
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Que Roy Pays The Rent...HERE
ManrisFrack
.223 Rem
Let's contract Google to write it. I'm sure we can trust any algorithm created by Google.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Well, they watched and learned from the best teachers.
Last edited:
when the supply of infant adrenochrome dries up....
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
spat
.700 Nitro Express
No trusting necessary.
The algorithms already exist for other uses, it's just a matter of applying them to voting districts.
And we're talking about an algorithm, not a specific program. Once the algorithm is chosen, then it doesn't matter who writes the code, the answer should be the same.
The algorithm is the process. It would be codified in the law in this scenerio.
Don't trust Google, or Dominion, or whoever ? Then write your own code and run it. If you don't get the same exact answer they do from the same input, that's proof one of you has a bug. That would be enough evidence to sue and get the districts corrected.
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
She is still walking .. ..
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
BREAKING REPORT: Republican-leaning states have been shortchanged at least 3 CONGRESSIONAL SEATS AND ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES as a result of their population being undercounted in the 2020 census... Bureau said there’s NO WAY TO CORRECT THE ERRORS until the next census..
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
Now she predicts the future? How come she didn’t know she was going to lose against Trump then?
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Jack Posobiec
@JackPosobiec
·
1h
BREAKING: Prior to the 2020 election, tech companies including Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Discord, Wikipedia, Microsoft, LinkedIn, and Verizon met on a monthly basis with the FBI, DHS, and other govt agencies on to coordinate censorship operations
@JackPosobiec
·
1h
BREAKING: Prior to the 2020 election, tech companies including Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Discord, Wikipedia, Microsoft, LinkedIn, and Verizon met on a monthly basis with the FBI, DHS, and other govt agencies on to coordinate censorship operations