How Judges Ignore Law and the Constitution on the Right to Arms

[Madmallard]

Good read on Progressivism.

How Judges Ignore Law and the Constitution on the Right to Arms

For the last 50 years, I have been hearing or reading versions of this argument: The Second Amendment is clear. All we have to do is b...

gunwatch.blogspot.com

 

[Marine Cpl]

Corruption. Plain and simple. A judge is supposed to rule on the text of the constitution whether he agrees with it or not. Period! They aren’t supposed to refer to previous rulings that perversed it as reasoning to continue to infringe on it. They aren’t supposed to quote previous laws that also perversed it and stood for decades as reasoning to infringe on it.

All these judges aren’t being impartial like they are supposed to be. They are traitors to the American people.

 

[Toecutter]

My rights dont come from judges .

 

[Catskillkid]

My rights dont come from judges .

I seem to remember reading this somewhere:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness..."

 

[Podmonkey]

"Progressivism" is at invalid, its core tenets are corrupt. But it will not leave us unless by the point of a sword. Time to get cracking.