Well I guess just hunt on your own property and don’t worry about it.Uh, NO, IT'S NOT. The OLD rule is geared toward youth hunters. It applied to youth hunters and their mentors. This applies to everyone.
Well I guess just hunt on your own property and don’t worry about it.Uh, NO, IT'S NOT. The OLD rule is geared toward youth hunters. It applied to youth hunters and their mentors. This applies to everyone.
Turn off Shawshank Redemption and go get some fresh air.More obtuse justifications.
I think anyone who can demonstrate the necessary skill and maturity should be able to fly commercial airliners and drive semi trucks.I like the idea of safety regs for youth. Just like how kids can’t fly commercial airliners or drive semi trucks.
Oh bother.I think anyone who can demonstrate the necessary skill and maturity should be able to fly commercial airliners and drive semi trucks.
I don't think "years since you were born" is a very useful metric for anything other than life insurance premiums.
Huh ?Turn off Shawshank Redemption and go get some fresh air.
Yep, while there is a correlation, it is not strong enough to justify using it as a metric.Oh bother.
Read up on how the human brain works and it’s relevance to age and sound decision making. Then circle back.
I like the idea of safety regs for youth. Just like how kids can’t fly commercial airliners or drive semi trucks.
Dude you just defended fashion police.More extremism and hysteria.
Unfortunately that’s the exception not the rule.I like being responsible for my children. I will teach them what they need in life about being a good man and a good citizen. I do not need the .gov to watch over my young.
Unfortunately that’s the exception not the rule.
Basic safety equipment for youth is fashion police now? You’ve already stated your “every law is unconstitutional” liberation extremist view. There is no common ground to be reached with an extremist such as yourself. I’m sorry your views lead to non stop disappointment for you. It must be tough. Not sure how you keep it up. You’d think a simple one like wear orange so you don’t accidentally get shot would be an easy one to start with. You can lead a horse to water…Dude you just defended fashion police.
Your telescreen messing with your brainwaves?
This is the crux of the problem. You would think that. We know.You’d think a simple one like wear orange so you don’t accidentally get shot would be an easy one to start with.
Having extreme ideas that nobody else backs doesn’t make you a revolutionist.This is the crux of the problem. You would think that. We know.
And yes, I'm extreme AF. You might even say revolutionary.
He is not alone in many of them.Having extreme ideas that nobody else backs doesn’t make you a revolutionist.
Every traffic sign and every traffic light can be interpreted as government intrusion on freedom. Take them all down and see what happens.
Do you know what a revolution is? Ideas that go nowhere do not qualify.He is not alone in many of them.
In this thread the people who agree with you appear to be the minority.
Do you know what a revolution is? Ideas that go nowhere do not qualify.
Wjat do they disagree with meon? I said it shouldn’t be a law but rather included in basic safety classes and publications. I said if you don’t want to then don’t. Not much of anything can or will happen to you from the perspective of the state. It doesn’t warrant this many pages. Absent extremist the sky is falling bluster, there is little to discuss in the matter.
Basic safety equipment for youth is fashion police now? You’ve already stated your “every law is unconstitutional” liberation extremist view. There is no common ground to be reached with an extremist such as yourself. I’m sorry your views lead to non stop disappointment for you. It must be tough. Not sure how you keep it up. You’d think a simple one like wear orange so you don’t accidentally get shot would be an easy one to start with. You can lead a horse to water…
You have one of those traffic lights in your driveway?
It's reasonable for the government to mandate behavior as a condition of using public property that would not be reasonable for them to mandate universally.Traffic signs and traffic lights are on government property, but I am forced to abide by them through punishment. It's not optional, it's mandatory. That's the intrusion.
Traffic signs and traffic lights are on public property, but I am forced to abide by them through punishment. It's not optional, it's mandatory. That's the intrusion.most rational people will accept if they don't always abide by them.
So if I have private hunting land, why should I have to abide by these laws on my property?
Because bullets don't stop at the property line.
Nor do cars.
Imagine having nothing going on where you have the time and energy to get all worked up over hunters having to wear the orange clothes they already own and have been wearing anyway.
If it truly is just a recommendation, or only required on state land, then it's reasonable (as a recommendation, even prudent).here you go .. note the yellow highlight i added .. not a LAW .. but Recommended ...
View attachment 122778