I’m getting very sick of the governors Covid rules- state parks limited now

[Saltwater60]

I just recieved this email and it pisses me off to no end. Why now? This is getting old and fast.


State Parks Reminds Visitors That Social Distancing Measures Are In Effect

The New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (State Parks) reminds visitors that measures to reduce park density and maintain social distance are in effect. Visitors should be familiar with social distancing guidelineswhen visiting the outdoors and have an alternative plan ready if they arrive at a park that has reached capacity or appears crowded.

State Parks has reduced the number of available parking spaces, and many parks will close to incoming traffic by noon. Illegally parked vehicles will be ticketed and may be towed.

For the safety of all visitors, please wear a face covering when you cannot maintain social distance.

Please recreate locally, practice social distancing, and use common sense to protect yourself and others.

 

[technicalgadget]

All the state parks are going to be jam packed today and tomorrow.

 

[Dr. Evil]

Almost makes me think Cuomo has something to do with the nice weather hitting this weekend. Like he is mind f$%king with people.

 

[Toecutter]

Last week I saw an article people were being told they can hike in fahnestock.

 

[libertysnake]

All the state parks are going to be jam packed today and tomorrow.

Police should kick the fuckers out of public parks if they can't keep their distance. I'm getting tired of this shit. And it's not just young people. I see plenty of old idiots as well walking side by side across trails not giving a fuck to keep their distance.

It's not the end of the world, but people need to have some fucking respect.

 

[Dr. Evil]

Police should kick the fuckers out of public parks if they can't keep their distance. I'm getting tired of this shit. And it's not just young people. I see plenty of old idiots as well walking side by side across trails not giving a fuck to keep their distance.

It's not the end of the world, but people need to have some fucking respect.

Respectfully disagree. Has nothing to do with not respecting someone. If you have comorbidity or are vulnerable you should stay away from crowds. If not this is nonsense to make everyone follow this BS. Then do this all year around if it is about germs.

 

[Celt]

Police should kick the fuckers out of public parks if they can't keep their distance. I'm getting tired of this shit. And it's not just young people. I see plenty of old idiots as well walking side by side across trails not giving a fuck to keep their distance.

It's not the end of the world, but people need to have some fucking respect.

Yeah, and they should have to wear arm bands that identify who they are too.

Edit: ill add to this. I dont think people should be holding house parties with 50 people as thats not smart. But i see nothing wrong with smart, responsible people.

Should a family of 4 be forced to stay in their home, or can they walk close enough without someone getting their pantiesnin a bunch and calling the snitch line? If people are walking trails and pass by someone else i dont thinkbits a big deal. Be smart and cautious, and that doesnt mean you have to stay 6' away from every human being.

 

[libertysnake]

Respectfully disagree. Has nothing to do with not respecting someone. If you have comorbidity or are vulnerable you should stay away from crowds. If not this is nonsense to make everyone follow this BS. Then do this all year around if it is about germs.

Ok, then they can stop taking my taxes for public parks and I'll stop complaining. I'm sure that'll go over well.

 

[Dr. Evil]

Ok, then they can stop taking my taxes for public parks and I'll stop complaining. I'm sure that'll go over well.

No, the effort should be on you if you are vulnerable. I shouldn't be inconvenienced for what happens due to most people's lifestyle choices. It's called personal responsibility. Not speaking about you or anyone in particular just a general statement. Bottom line is this. If we were a healthier society and people took personal responsibility for their health and didn't leave it up to pathetic organizations like the WHO and CDC this all would be mute.

 

[Bananabandit]

either stay home or shut your cork soaker

mAiNtAiN 6 fEet, sOcIaL dIsTaNcInG

Eat my crack

 

[spat]

Yeah, and they should have to wear arm bands that identify who they are too.

Edit: ill add to this. I dont think people should be holding house parties with 50 people as thats not smart. But i see nothing wrong with smart, responsible people.

Should a family of 4 be forced to stay in their home, or can they walk close enough without someone getting their pantiesnin a bunch and calling the snitch line? If people are walking trails and pass by someone else i dont thinkbits a big deal. Be smart and cautious, and that doesnt mean you have to stay 6' away from every human being.

The guys having the house party are volunteering to take one for the team in the name of herd immunity.

We should thank them.

Think of it this way:

Your forced to play Russian roulette by a tyrannical Chinese regime, are you going to be upset that the guy across the table wants to take extra turns ?

As far as lockdowns and social distancing go, think of it this way, you're still playing the game, and one of the chambers is still loaded, but now it's an 8 shot revolver instead of 6. The game will take a little longer, but the end result is going to be the same.

 

[libertysnake]

Ok, then by that logic I shouldn’t have to pay to bail out idiots that are living paycheck to paycheck. The stimulus money should be given back to the federal and state governments because fuck em. I shouldn’t be inconvenienced because people are bad at money management.

If we were a more responsible society financially then this wouldn’t happen. If people took responsibility of their finances then this wouldn’t happen that we have to bail out everyone week 1.

Your same logic, just applied to something people can change that isn’t genetic — their finances.

No, the effort should be on you if you are vulnerable. I shouldn't be inconvenienced for what happens due to most people's lifestyle choices. It's called personable responsibility. Not speaking about you or anyone in particular just a general statement. Bottom line is this. If we were a healthier society and people took personable responsibility for their health and didn't leave it up to pathetic organizations like the WHO and CDC this all would be mute.

 

[Dr. Evil]

Ok, then by that logic I shouldn’t have to pay to bail out idiots that are living paycheck to paycheck. The stimulus money should be given back to the federal and state governments because fuck em. I shouldn’t be inconvenienced because people are bad at money management.

If we were a more responsible society financially then this wouldn’t happen. If people took responsibility of their finances then this wouldn’t happen that we have to bail out everyone week 1.

Your same logic, just applied to something people can change that isn’t genetic — their finances.

We all (the people here legally at least) pay taxes. It also isn't what we have saved and what we haven't. It is the fact that the government is stopping many from earning a living. That being said we all don't take care of our bodies.

 

[libertysnake]

We all (the people here legally at least) pay taxes. We all don't take care of our bodies.

We do pay taxes. But like you said, I shouldn't be able to visit a park because I'm a diabetic. Too bad for me.

Likewise, under that logic, we shouldn't give money to the people out of work. Too bad for them. They could have, but didn't, make the right choices -- similar to the people SOL due to their bad health choices.

Both situations involve taxes funding them (the parks, and the stimulus). You can't selectively apply logic in the case of the parks, but then not admit that same irresponsibility fuels the paycheck to paycheck bullshit that responsible tax payers have to pay for right now.

If responsibility stops with the individual, then the same logic applies to the stimulus.

 

[Dr. Evil]

At some point it isn't about masks or social distancing anymore. At some point it's about liberty, freedom and personal responsibility. I have been at it with a lot of sheep all over the internet lately and I am very tired of hearing some chant, "You don't care about others." "You don't care about those with health issues." I look at it like this.

I am no more responsible for you and yours than you are for me and mine. Some would say I am a selfish individual for my stance. Well, my answer is yes and no to that. I do look out for myself. If I don't who will? I don't necessarily consider that a bad thing. I have though spent and continue to spend a great deal of time, money and effort in a career where I try to help people recover health and avoid health problems. It comes down to what people really value. The ones who listen and implement I care a great deal about. The others who choose not to listen, pay attention or wouldn't consider questioning anything other than the approach and advice they follow that has resulted in them being vulnerable and afraid I really don't care about. Yes, there is a percentage of people where things are truly out of their hands but for the majority that simply isn't the case.

We all make choices and have to deal with the consequences of those decisions. I have made many poor choices in my life and wish some things were different in those regards but I don't blame others for my situation nor do I expect them to change their lives because of it. That's on me. You either take the time to question those advising you and change or you don't.

I find it interesting that when a mental person or evil individual shoots up a school or social situation many cry out that we are not responsible for their actions and don't want any more taken away from us. We are responsible gun owners and should be treated as such. We protest against unjust rules, laws and over reaching in the name of safety even if it just "saves one life." We cry out we are incrementally losing liberty for reasons that make absolutely no sense when you apply critical thinking and not emotion. Yet, some then turn around and cry we need to follow the recommendations now." If you had a family member you'd be singing a different tune" I hear. "You don't know what it's like."

The bottom line to me is this. Go ahead and keep doing the doing the same things lifestyle wise. Go ahead and keep listening to the "experts", the same ones that have been wrong on almost every aspect of this virus. Go ahead and give me crap for taking a different point of view and approach. Go ahead and social distance. Go ahead and wear your face mask. Go ahead and live your life. Just don't expect me to live your life too.

 

[Darth]

We do pay taxes. But like you said, I shouldn't be able to visit a park because I'm a diabetic. Too bad for me.

Likewise, under that logic, we shouldn't give money to the people out of work. Too bad for them. They could have, but didn't, make the right choices -- similar to the people SOL due to their bad health choices.

Both situations involve taxes funding them (the parks, and the stimulus). You can't selectively apply logic in the case of the parks, but then not admit that same irresponsibility fuels the paycheck to paycheck bullshit that responsible tax payers have to pay for right now.

If responsibility stops with the individual, then the same logic applies to the stimulus.

We shouldn't be paying for the stimulus, the parks, and most certainly not the ridiculous notion that the gestapo and those arresting for the crime of "existing in too close a proximity to another human."

 

[Dr. Evil]

We do pay taxes. But like you said, I shouldn't be able to visit a park because I'm a diabetic. Too bad for me.

Likewise, under that logic, we shouldn't give money to the people out of work. Too bad for them. They could have, but didn't, make the right choices -- similar to the people SOL due to their bad health choices.

Both situations involve taxes funding them (the parks, and the stimulus). You can't selectively apply logic in the case of the parks, but then not admit that same irresponsibility fuels the paycheck to paycheck bullshit that responsible tax payers have to pay for right now.

If responsibility stops with the individual, then the same logic applies to the stimulus.

I never said you shouldn't be able to visit a park. The onus is on you though to protect yourself, not on me to worry about you how far I stand from you. Which BTW really doesn't mean squat but that's besides the point. I promise I won't sneeze in your mouth.

 

[libertysnake]

We shouldn't be paying for the stimulus, the parks, and most certainly not the ridiculous notion that the gestapo and those arresting for the crime of "existing in too close a proximity to another human."

No one should be arrested. I just find it disrespectful to not do so since it’s such a trivial ask. That’s all.

Agreed I shouldn’t have to pay for it either.

 

[Darth]

No one should be arrested. I just find it disrespectful to not do so since it’s such a trivial ask. That’s all.

Agreed I shouldn’t have to pay for it either.

I find it disrespectful that you assume your fellow Americans are disease spreading vessels with no right to use the park they paid for.

 

[libertysnake]

I find it disrespectful that you assume your fellow Americans are disease spreading vessels with no right to use the park they paid for.

I mean, do you wear a condom? It’s the same idea. Better safe than sorry.

 

[GOYABEAN]

Pretty soon you'll be reading in the best interest of future generations we will be detonating several small thermalbaric bombs in area's A-E starting in western counties of land and will continue in alphabetical order so please remain in your home's it's for your safety violators may be fined or arrested for violating quarantine orders thank you for your cooperation

 

[Darth]

I mean, do you wear a condom? It’s the same idea. Better safe than sorry.

Not the same idea. Choice vs. Mandate.

And depending on the situation, no. This would be like advocating a condom for Whoopie with your wife, because "you never know."

 

[Dr. Evil]

I also seem to remember a very brave young man a few years ago after UnSafe was enacted speaking at a Dutchess county legislative meeting. It went viral and for good reason. He was a veteran and telling a story of what fighting was like and how he watched his friend get blown up during a firefight. He very poignantly said, "I'm sorry folks. My rights trump your dead." I'm sure many on here would have liked to shake that mans hand. There was a big cheer by gun rights folks like you and me. I guess that goes out the window when we are talking about a virus though.

 

[Dr. Evil]

I mean, do you wear a condom? It’s the same idea. Better safe than sorry.

If you wear a condom it doesn't take away from my rights. Again, my job isn't to make the world a safer place for anyone. Well, maybe my family.

 

[Dr. Evil]

The bigger picture.

Judge Napolitano: Politicians Are Taking Our Rights Away In The Name Of Public ‘Safety’

Fox News senior legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano said Friday Americans are falling for “the illusion of safety” and are forgetting “the idea of liberty.”

dailycaller.com

 

[Shadow2]

How does this sound if you don't want to catch Covid stay home ... I think the people are capable of deciding for themselves.

 

[libertysnake]

I find it disrespectful that you assume your fellow Americans are disease spreading vessels with no right to use the park they paid for.

Did I say people had no rights to use the park? No, I didn't.

The only ask I had was that people just keep some distance out of respect for other people. That's all I asked. It's a request, not a demand.

 

[Darth]

Did I say people had no rights to use the park? No, I didn't.

The only ask I had was that people just keep some distance out of respect for other people. That's all I asked. It's a request, not a demand.

...

Police should kick the fuckers out of public parks if they can't keep their distance.

 

[libertysnake]

...

Right, but after that point I changed my stance to a request later in the conversation. I'll amend my stance. What is so egregious that you can't keep six feet of distance from people?

 

[Darth]

Right, but after that point I changed my stance to a request later in the conversation. What is so egregious that you can't keep six feet of distance from people?

Beyond there not really being any valid reason to, it's irrelevant. You get as close as you want to our as far as you want to be away from others.

What's wrong with getting vaccines? Nothing. Still has no place being mandated.