Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Correct. Month to month renter, yes. Lease, no.Not if they enter a contract and they are in breech of the agreement.
Correct. Month to month renter, yes. Lease, no.Not if they enter a contract and they are in breech of the agreement.
Id have to argue you can't sign away a constitutional right in a lease agreement, we arn't talking about a pet or smoking. Its the equivalent of saying you won't practice a religion or vote while staying in dwelling ... if pressed it wont hold up in court. Their is plenty of precedent with hotel rooms ect and the right to bear arms ... it would fail once it made it past local courts under strict scrutiny SCOUTS would laugh it out of the court.
Guys. The Constitution is protections from the government. Not private businesses. Darth is correct on that point.
Came here to post about this. I've said for a while now that this sort of active discrimination against gun owners was coming. We need to start pushing for legislation to make it illegal to discriminate against gun owners, or against anyone who is simply exercising their rights.
Guys. The Constitution is protections from the government. Not private businesses. Darth is correct on that point.
Agreed. With that out of the way, Why can't a landlord add stipulations regarding political party or religion?
From the link I posted in post #70
Unlike members of a race, religion, ethnicity and so on, gun owners enjoy no protection from negative treatment aimed at them simply because they happen to own guns. You certainly can’t target protected groups with your policy, such as applying it to members of a particular race only, but you can refuse to rent to every applicant who wants to keep guns on the property.
Which is crap. The BOR wasn't written to apply to businesses and landlords.
He could. He can ask those questions before he gives the lease and refuse to lease it to them.Agreed. With that out of the way, Why can't a landlord add stipulations regarding political party or religion?
Most states remain silent on the issue, which effectively allows landlords to stipulate in the lease whether firearms are allowed on the property or not.
“If there’s no state law that says they are prohibited from limiting guns, then the default would be that as a private landlord, you can prohibit any activities on your property that you want, other than those that might discriminate under discrimination laws,” Skojec says.
Some states go further and establish that a landlord has the express right to ban guns from their property. Tennessee law explicitly allows landlords to prohibit firearms in their rentals by including the ban through a clause in the lease or by following a uniform landlord-tenant act that exists in some counties in the state. If a Tennessee landlord posts signs prohibiting firearms that follow state requirements, a violating tenant could even be subject to criminal prosecution.
Minnesota, on the other hand, forbids landlord prohibitions of firearms outright. As the 2017 firearm possession statutes note: “A landlord may not restrict the lawful carry or possession of firearms by tenants or their guests.”
Other states limit a landlord’s right to establish rules but leave room for some restrictions. Ohio law, for example, restricts landlords from prohibiting tenants or their guests from possessing a firearm when they are concealed carry licensees.
Wrong.Probably, but it doesn't really matter. A landlord can boot you off their property at any time.
Despite changing your claim, you're still wrong.A landlord can terminate a lease at any time, and they should be able to. Why in the world should you be forced to house people on your property that you don't want there?