"Large Capacity" mags protected, 9th circuit
- Thread starter Edwardteach72
- Start date
You believed it and posted it as proof of your belief. They got ya.
"California Attorney General Xavier Becerra's office was disappointed with the ruling, though it remains unclear whether Becerra plans to ask the full court to consider the case or advance the issue to the U.S. Supreme Court.
"We are carefully reviewing the decision, with the goal of protecting public safety," an adviser in Becerra's office told NPR, adding that the stay on the injunction issued by the District Court remains in place."
"We are carefully reviewing the decision, with the goal of protecting public safety," an adviser in Becerra's office told NPR, adding that the stay on the injunction issued by the District Court remains in place."
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
Well. Setting aside California, they're probably not shipping to NY because NY is not subject to the 9th Circuit ruling, stayed or not.
Well. Setting aside California, they're probably not shipping to NY because NY is not subject to the 9th Circuit ruling, stayed or not.
I mean but I do know of a company that was shipping mags to NY, they had to stop because they couldn't keep up with demand
Exactly. But he claimed that they are shipping to CA illegally because they "stand up for 2A". The stay is in full force making it just as illegal to ship there as it is here. That's where his claim quickly and easily fell apart.Well. Setting aside California, they're probably not shipping to NY because NY is not subject to the 9th Circuit ruling, stayed or not.
Exactly. But he claimed that they are shipping to CA illegally because they "stand up for 2A". The stay is in full force making it just as illegal to ship there as it is here. That's where his claim quickly and easily fell apart.
Oh i said they are illegally shipping?
Show me the quote and the post number I said they are illegally shipping?
Seems like if a company was doing so well they wouldn't shut off the fountain. They would just have longer fulfillment times. If McDonalds sold too many Big Macs would they take them off the menu? Isn't the purpose to sell and make money?
I call BS.
Guess you can't read about them being small and not able to keep up with demand..
Of course you call BS because you don't know the company and didn't get a chance to order from them
You posted several where you said they are shipping to CA. The shipping to CA is illegal, by court order of stay.
Yea yea so successful we had to shut it down. I bet.
Are you posting here that you purchased these magazines and committed a felony? Might want to rethink this.
Stop dancing. You said they were shipping to CA, an act which is illegal.
Yea yea so successful we had to shut it down. I bet.
Are you posting here that you purchased these magazines and committed a felony? Might want to rethink this.
Did I say I bought them?
Yea yea so successful we had to shut it down. I bet.
Are you posting here that you purchased these magazines and committed a felony? Might want to rethink this.
Show me where I said I purchased any magazines??
You certainly imply it. "you're just mad that you didn't get a chance to get them"
According to your news sight, but you are right I'm sure a small business like Brownells doesn't have the resources for a legal team to let them know if they can or cannot ship magazines
I didn't imply anything, all I said is YOU didn't, which is obvious because you don't even know the business I was talking about
Read the court order. You don't need a legal team. It is in clear and plain English.
Admit it. You fell for an ad. Gotta go!
Well the good thing is brownells probably doesn't have a legal team??
how did i fall for anything, I haven't bought anything from brownells since 2014
I've addressed it. You read the ad. You believed what the ad told you. You posted it here as proof of such. You fell for the ad. You don't have to buy it to believe it.
Oh? So can you prove that they haven't shipped any orders to California?
Still waiting for you to show where I said they are illegally shipping to California.
Also show where I committed a felony by buying "illegal" mags that you said I admitted to doing??
All have been addressed. I dont need to prove anything. You made the claim that they are shipping. I have shown court proof that it is illegal.
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
Well, having gone back and read the actual text...
The permanent injunction is stayed pending final adjudication of the case.
The preliminary injuction remains in place.
If I'm Brownells I wouldn't be entirely uncomfortable shipping standard mags to CA at this moment in time.
The permanent injunction is stayed pending final adjudication of the case.
The preliminary injuction remains in place.
If I'm Brownells I wouldn't be entirely uncomfortable shipping standard mags to CA at this moment in time.
“Until further proceedings in the courts, the stay on the injunction issued by the district court remains in place"
sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com
"His office argued that the ruling would not immediately overturn the ban because a stay issued in 2017 by a lower court judge remains in effect."
www.nytimes.com
"Gun owners cannot immediately rush to buy high-capacity magazines because a stay issued by the lower court judge remains in place."
"We are carefully reviewing the decision, with the goal of protecting public safety," an adviser in Becerra's office told NPR, adding that the stay on the injunction issued by the District Court remains in place."
www.npr.org
"Gun owners cannot immediately rush to buy high-capacity magazines because a stay issued by the lower court judge remains in place."
kmph.com
"Gun owners cannot immediately rush to buy high-capacity magazines because a stay issued by the lower court judge remains in place."
"Becerra asked for a stay of Benitez’s order Monday to “preserve the status quo,” and “prevent the surge of large-capacity magazine acquisitions in the state of California” pending the attorney general’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit."
www.courthousenews.com
Yup the ad you fell for overrides this for sure! 
9th Circuit Court Panel Ends California Ban On High-Capacity Magazines
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday threw out California's ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines.
sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com
"His office argued that the ruling would not immediately overturn the ban because a stay issued in 2017 by a lower court judge remains in effect."
California’s Ban on High-Capacity Magazines Violates the Second Amendment, Court Rules (Published 2020)
Supporters of tougher gun laws called the ruling a dangerous infringement on the ability of states to protect their residents from mass shootings.
"Gun owners cannot immediately rush to buy high-capacity magazines because a stay issued by the lower court judge remains in place."
"We are carefully reviewing the decision, with the goal of protecting public safety," an adviser in Becerra's office told NPR, adding that the stay on the injunction issued by the District Court remains in place."
Federal Appeals Court Throws Out California Ban On Large-Capacity Gun Magazines
The court on Friday rules that the state's "near-categorical ban of [the magazines] infringes on the fundamental right to self-defense." The decision is a blow to gun control activists.
www.npr.org
"Gun owners cannot immediately rush to buy high-capacity magazines because a stay issued by the lower court judge remains in place."
9th Circuit ends California ban on high-capacity magazines
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A three-judge panel of the 9th U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday threw out California's ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines, saying the law violates the U. S. Constitution's protection of the right to bear firearms. “Even well-intentioned laws must pass...
kmph.com
"Gun owners cannot immediately rush to buy high-capacity magazines because a stay issued by the lower court judge remains in place."
"Becerra asked for a stay of Benitez’s order Monday to “preserve the status quo,” and “prevent the surge of large-capacity magazine acquisitions in the state of California” pending the attorney general’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit."
Judge Stays His Own Order to Allow High-Capacity Gun Magazines
California residents who have acquired high-capacity gun magazines in the week since a federal judge found the state’s voter-approved ban on the firearms unconstitutional will be allowed to keep th…
www.courthousenews.com
Yup the ad you fell for overrides this for sure!
It's just as illegal to ship or possess now as it ever was. Nothing is changed yet. No commerce may take place. These are not my words, but the courts.
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
"state law barring the importation, manufacturing, sale, gifting, lending or buying of gun magazines with more than 10 rounds of ammunition"
This is the original decision of stay which was affirmed to remain in effect this week.
Judge Stays His Own Order to Allow High-Capacity Gun Magazines
California residents who have acquired high-capacity gun magazines in the week since a federal judge found the state’s voter-approved ban on the firearms unconstitutional will be allowed to keep th…
www.courthousenews.com
ORDER STAYING IN PART JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL