Only change if this Mayor breaks out the kool aid,Jim Jones used the same lines.
It’s a man bun now. Man bun.Does his god have horns and a pointy tail ?
Does his god have horns and a pointy tail ?
Well some of his statements certainly are true and he’s making some waves for sure. He’s right that when God left men and women in society and schools we have more issues.
I’m working to make things right in my life and maybe he is as well. Who knows. I think he’s a bit nuts but there are a lot of things I can explain in my life that can only be explained supernaturally. I’m walking through a tough time right now and I downloaded a new app to help me out and everything has been pointed right at my struggle. There’s no way for that app to know. Crazy things happen and I won’t even attempt to explain them.
Which ones?I also think that society started going down the shitter when Judeo-Christian values started going out of the door.
Say what you want about religion, but zealoysly secular governments don't seem to be much better.Which ones?
As for Mayor Adams, he seems to be making a claim that he spoke with god without any evidence to back this up.
So, how exactly does this differ from other religious projections?
Not sure what a "zealously secular government" is, but we certainly dodged a bullet by living in a country that wasn't founded on religion, no matter how hard the right tries to shoehorn it.Say what you want about religion, but zealoysly secular governments don't seem to be much better.
Whether you call the victims of your pogrom anti-revolutionaries or heretics, they all burn at the stake the same.
The problem is letting people have power, not the rhetoric they use to justify seizing it.
A zealously secular government would be one where the government (or party) assumes the role of religion in society.Not sure what a "zealously secular government" is, but we certainly dodged a bullet by living in a country that wasn't founded on religion, no matter how hard the right tries to shoehorn it.
Women subservient to men? That's a 180 degree no from me Dawg.
Not sure what a "zealously secular government" is, but we certainly dodged a bullet by living in a country that wasn't founded on religion, no matter how hard the right tries to shoehorn it.
Women subservient to men? That's a 180 degree no from me Dawg.
Oh yeah, I forgot, you don't understand the definition of atheist and agnostic. My bad.A zealously secular government would be one where the government (or party) assumes the role of religion in society.
For instance, most communist regimes, where they expect people to be devoted to the state, and see any notion of "god" to be a threat to their control.
It's basically the same thing as a theocracy, but they claim their magic can violate the laws of economics instead of physics.
The Spanish inquisition was no fun, but I can assure you the Khymer Rouge was worse.
The only *good* government is one that takes an agnostic position, i.e. it is neutral towards religion.
Atheist zealots are every bit as dangerous as the theist ones.
Can you briefly describe what the lack of belief in a god or gods has to do with LGBTQ+, at all?I certainly don't want to live in a real world Handmaid's Tale or a theocracy. However, I feel that atheism can lead to nihilism and the secularism that we seem to have today has led to degeneracy.
Frankly I don't care what you believe in or don't believe in or who you sleep with as long as they're of age but the more I look at our world I see a deep slide into hedonistic nihilism and degeneracy. Drag queen story hours and the new transsexual narrative are examples of this.
A friend of mine's wife works in an elementary school. She says that about a third of the kids identify as LGBTQ+. That's not a natural increase because of more openness in society. That's indoctrination. I see a clear parallel between that and the replacement of Judeo-Christian values with wokism which while not the same as atheism is adjacent.
Depends on witch god Bo is face bow-wowing to?Using God and his name for Vanity is a SIN!!!
Just sayin...
You're like the transgenders. Just because you *want* the definitions to be something else doesn't make it so.Oh yeah, I forgot, you don't understand the definition of atheist and agnostic. My bad.
Unfortunately for this hypothesis, it isn't "my version. " That's the great thing about reality. There is no "my version" of it.You're like the transgenders. Just because you *want* the definitions to be something else doesn't make it so.
The words are very clear.
A-theist. A meaning without and theist being God.
A gnostic. A still means without, and gnostic means knowledge.
One holds a belief that God doesn't exist.
One doesn't believe they know.
Your version where there is some bizarre "agnostic atheist" who doesn't know what to believe but somehow also believes there isn't a God is just absurd.
That is not due to atheism. That is due to zealotry.I feel that atheism can lead to nihilism and the secularism that we seem to have today has led to degeneracy.
They can be, because you are trying to separate belief and knowledge in a way that's impossible.Unfortunately for this hypothesis, it isn't "my version. " That's the great thing about reality. There is no "my version" of it.
Atheist: Without a belief in God or God's.
Agnostic: Without knowledge of something.
Hence the 2 cannot be mutually exclusive as they describe different things.
View attachment 203661