Missouri Gun Shop Refuses To Sell Weapons, Ammo To Biden Supporters, And They’re Very Upset

[Cooolone]

What's good for the goose, is good for the gander!!!

Too bad...

You reap what you sow!

Fuckers want to keep going with the cancel culture, they need to realize it might be them that are cancelled!!!

Pffffft!

 

[Toecutter]

Gas stations should stop selling them gas.

 

[Saltwater60]

I'd like all Americans that are working and honestly participating to have healthcare. How violent of me.



The first two words cover it for me. All of the rest is unneeded. Having a particular affiliation isn't a protected status. If they want to ban liberals or whatever, that's their right to do so in my book. Liberals can go to another store that will take their money. This is how the free market works. If liberals don't like it, any of them are free to start up their own gun shop.




Yeah, no thanks to any of that stuff.

Yes that’s what he’s talking about, health care. You violent assholes for wanting health care.
Im pretty sure he’s speaking about the BLM/antifa protests that went on for months burning, looting, stealing, and occupying. Did they all just want health care?

 

[Briwesk85]

How did that interaction go down?

i wasnt there personally but i saw the facebook post that the customer posted to local town facebook group, also heard from the shop owner directly. Customer threatened to sue, and cursed him out, haha.

 

[spat]

Free enterprise. Facebook can ban some conservative speech, and gun shops can effectively ban gun ownership of the left. The sword can cut both ways.

In the end I think both are wrong, but the way you demonstrate both are wrong is that you take the argument to the logical conclusion -- which hopefully sparks the conversation of "maybe we should actually protect free speech and other amendments."

In this case, the logical conclusion is free enterprise will be weaponized via any legal means, as we've seen Facebook / Twitter / Amazon / Google demonstrate. It's not something that should be desired in this country, by any means, but it is something conservatives have to be willing to use in retaliation. Mutually assured censorship as a deterrent.

However, "mutually assured censorship" is absolutely not what we want. As temping as it will be for conservatives to do the same, my gut feeling here says that it will just leave the world a worse place. My gut is telling me the answer is to build free speech havens, and inflict economic pain on those that would choose to limit free speech. That seems like the way forward, rather than censoring both sides.

The left will never give it up if they know the right has unilaterally abandoned the practice.

Do you know why the Nazi's never used chemical weapons on the battlefield ? Because they were afraid of the Allies using them back.

If they weren't afraid that the US and Britain would out gas them, they would have rolled that shit out everywhere.

We are at war.

And there is is only ever one way to win a war, and that's to make the enemy unwilling to continue.

That's how goat herders and rice farmers with guns made from shovels in a hut can beat superpowers. They just DGAF, and the superpowers don't have the will to do things bad enough to make them GAF.

So, no, appeasement, and fighting with one hand tied behind your back are absolutely *not* the way to end this.

The way to end the censorship battle is to hurt the left with it so badly that they beg for it to end.

 

[spat]

How are they checking them out? Asking for their social media passcodes?

Probably just ask them to repeat the phrase "Make America Great Again".

If their tongue doesn't burst into flame they pass.

 

[Reno]

A few weeks ago there was a guy in a local busy diner making positive comments about Trump to another customer. The owner who apparently doesn’t like Trump started yelling at the guy and told him to leave. This made it onto Facebook and every time I drive by now the parking lot is empty. They just can’t help themselves.

 

[drowhawk]

A few weeks ago there was a guy in a local busy diner making positive comments about Trump to another customer. The owner who apparently doesn’t like Trump started yelling at the guy and told him to leave. This made it onto Facebook and every time I drive by now the parking lot is empty. They just can’t help themselves.

I would have taken the stinkiest dump in their bathroom before leaving.

 

[SonOfSun]

.
The way to end the censorship battle is to hurt the left with it so badly that they beg for it to end.

Block them from newsmax and fox. See if they give a shit.

 

[spat]

Block them from newsmax and fox. See if they give a shit.

Most farmers are pretty conservative.

Maybe they should stop selling food to anyone who supports the left..

Or to any stores or distributors who don't have a similar policy.

 

[SonOfSun]

Most farmers are pretty conservative.

Maybe they should stop selling food to anyone who supports the left..

Or to any stores or distributors who don't have a similar policy.

Left owns the bulk of the coasts. Boats go splash.

All of this is silly talk anyways. I'm not interested in isolating Americans or limiting their speech or whatnot because they might think differently about certain things.

 

[spat]

Left owns the bulk of the coasts. Boats go splash.

All of this is silly talk anyways. I'm not interested in isolating Americans or limiting their speech or whatnot because they might think differently about certain things.

I do not want that either.

But the left will *never* unilaterally give up these effective tactics.

They need to be forced to abandon them, and the *least* objectionable way to do that that I can think of is to beat them at their own game.

 

[libertysnake]

I do not want that either.

But the left will *never* unilaterally give up these effective tactics.

They need to be forced to abandon them, and the *least* objectionable way to do that that I can think of is to beat them at their own game.

Prime facie, I'd agree -- but I think what you're condoning will wind up destroying us all.

Not sure that's the answer we want.

 

[spat]

Prime facie, I'd agree -- but I think what you're condoning will wind up destroying us all.

Not sure that's the answer we want.

When they detonated the Trinity device at Los Alamos there was some concern it could initiate a runaway fusion reaction of the atmosphere. That would have destroyed all life on the planet.

They had done a lot of work and decided it was very unlikely, but since nobody had *ever* set off a nuclear explosion before they couldn't be sure.

When the situation gets very dire, you may have to take some very big risks.

I really do believe the situation in this country today is *more* dire than the one we were in at the time of the Trinity test.