New Accuser of Judge Kavanaugh Says He Pushed His Balls In Her Face.

[MothMan]

New allegation against Trump court pick

She hired Stormy Daniels lawyer. These attacks on Kavanaugh are fucking disgusting.

 

[MothMan]

These attacks are also being used to tell any prospective appointees “ your next “.

 

[GOYABEAN]

New allegation against Trump court pick

She hired Stormy Daniels lawyer. These attacks on Kavanaugh are fucking disgusting.

Next will be the Dr who might have spanked her after being delivered !

 

[Phazer]

More "conveniently-timed" recollections.

The Leftist Progressives are going scorched earth on this administration. The Libs need to be smacked down hard.

Slander suits should be filed.

 

[Deplorable Me]

What a banana republic we have become. Thank you liberal progressive communist democrats.

 

[Jmac00]

if these allegations are unfounded, these women MUST BE PROSECUTED and sent to jail. This bullshit is totally out of hand.

 

[Deplorable Me]

Shit gets deeper:
Brett Kavanaugh and pals accused of gang rapes in high school, says lawyer Michael Avenatti - NY Daily News

 

[masterswimmer]

Slander suits should be filed.

Actually slander is the oral or spoken form of defamation of character.

Ford did her defamation in the written form to the corpse Feinstein. That was libel.

Maybe that's why Feinstein refuses to release the written letter?

 

[BDinPutnam]

Actually slander is the oral or spoken form of defamation of character.

Ford did her defamation in the written form to the corpse Feinstein. That was libel.

Maybe that's why Feinstein refuses to release the written letter?

Libel is a civil claim and very hard to prove for damages. Particularly when the victim of libel (or slander) is a public figure.

Perjury, on the other hand, is a criminal charge, and the blatently obvious reason none of these people are speeding full steam ahead to raise their right hands and actually testify under oath anywhere.

 

[masterswimmer]

Libel is a civil claim and very hard to prove for damages. Particularly when the victim of libel (or slander) is a public figure.

Perjury, on the other hand, is a criminal charge, and the blatently obvious reason none of these people are speeding full steam ahead to raise their right hands and actually testify under oath anywhere.

Unless the slander is recorded it is often times more of a he said vs she said accusation.
Libel on the other hand is written so it is easier to prove (providing slander wasn't recorded).

 

[BDinPutnam]

Unless the slander is recorded it is often times more of a he said vs she said accusation.
Libel on the other hand is written so it is easier to prove (providing slander wasn't recorded).

The burden of proof in slander and/or libel isn't what was said or written itself alone but rather the knowledge of the speaker or writer of the truth itself, and their intent (mens rea) in making their statement. There is more to it, generally, but it's not simply "you said that mean, untrue thing about me." Particularly for public figures. If it werent, Trump would be as rich as he says he is.

 

[dubleuhb]

How convenient, lying Ford story falls apart and we have another shameless skank ready to step up.

If people don't see this for what it is and let this man be destroyed it's time to give these liberal fucks what they want.

What an embarrassing time in this country, we cannot let this group of traitors get away with it. Is this the straw that breaks the camel's back?

I hope so, we need to take back this government by any means necessary!

 

[usamerican]

New allegation against Trump court pick

She hired Stormy Daniels lawyer. These attacks on Kavanaugh are fucking disgusting.

You have to love the use of the alternative in Avenatti’s questions:

“for rape or sex”
“gang raped or used for sex”
“gang raped or taken advantage of”
“raped or taken advantage of”

And then of course have you even had any hanky panky with a female who had been drinking?

Follow up question, judge, when did you stop beating your wife?

 

[Phazer]

Actually slander is the oral or spoken form of defamation of character.

Ford did her defamation in the written form to the corpse Feinstein. That was libel.

Maybe that's why Feinstein refuses to release the written letter?

When she testifies, it'll be slander.

 

[Phazer]

The burden of proof in slander and/or libel isn't what was said or written itself alone but rather the knowledge of the speaker or writer of the truth itself, and their intent (mens rea) in making their statement. There is more to it, generally, but it's not simply "you said that mean, untrue thing about me." Particularly for public figures. If it werent, Trump would be as rich as he says he is.

Exactly.

I contend that some, if not all, of these accusers are politically motivated to knowingly lie.

 

[Deplorable Me]

Exactly.

I contend that some, if not all, of these accusers are politically motivated to knowingly lie.

The media is equally complicit, free speech is not totally unlimited. They can all burn in hell.

 

[dsdmmat]

When Trumps next pick is a Woman will the Dems bring the same attack? Little Johnny where did the bad Judge touch you?

 

[togmaster]

They saw the wheels falling off the Ford allegations so they had to come up with more lies in an attempt to delay his confirmation. It's pathetic what this whole nomination process (and our political system) has become.

 

[livingston]

Here is a good run down folks ..
New Yorker Publishes Accusation Containing ZERO Evidence to Support, and 100% of Evidence To Refute…
Posted on September 23, 2018 by sundance
This is beyond bizarre. Seriously. Forget the salacious details in the story…. the construct of the story is so stunningly flawed it is jaw-dropping as presented.

The New Yorker runs an article about an accusation made by a woman named Deborah Ramirez (53, pictured right) about a freshman party at Yale, where she claims she was in a drunken stupor and Judge Brett Kavanaugh, then 18, pulled out his penis during a drinking game.

Etc. Etc. Etc…. Really, no need to go further.

Why?

Because despite their search, and discussions with “dozens” of potential witnesses…

“The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident”…

….the New Yorker was unable to find a single witness to corroborate the story being made by the accuser. None. Not a single confirming witness to back up the claim. They write:

…”The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party.”…

But wait.

It gets better.


The accuser did give the New Yorker six names to support her claim. Six witnesses Deborah Ramirez stated could substantiate her accusation. And when the New Yorker interviewed them, ALL SIX said it never happened.
New Yorker Publishes Accusation Containing ZERO Evidence to Support, and 100% of Evidence To Refute…

 

[livingston]

Now, stop for a minute and think about this.

A claim is made.

The New Yorker tries to substantiate the claim.

The New Yorker finds ZERO people who can validate the claim.

The six witnesses the accuser says will back up her claim all deny any knowledge of the claim; yet the New Yorker still runs the article.

100% of the evidence discovered by the New Yorker refutes the claim.

Yet they publish it.

Enter the Star Chamber….
New Yorker Publishes Accusation Containing ZERO Evidence to Support, and 100% of Evidence To Refute…

 

[livingston]

'This is another serious, credible, and disturbing allegation against Brett Kavanagh,' said Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii.
'It should be fully investigated.'

President Donald Trump was notified of the allegations before the story went public, according to NBC News.

Trump has not changed his views on Kavanaugh and still supports him.

The White House also released a statement in response to The New Yorker story.

'This 35-year-old, uncorroborated claim is the latest in a coordinated smear campaign by the Democrats designed to tear down a good man,' said White House spokesperson Kerri Kupec.

'This claim is denied by all who were said to be present and is wholly inconsistent with what many women and men who knew Judge Kavanaugh at the time in college say.
Brett Kavanaugh hit by SECOND sex misconduct allegation: Yale classmate claims he 'exposed himself' | Daily Mail Online

 

[Carlos Hathcock]

Let's just assume that Brett sexually assaulted every woman in the US and only highlight the ones he didn't. This should make it easier kicking forward. Might as well be the way to proceed cause that's how it's going to go.

 

[libertysnake]

if these allegations are unfounded, these women MUST BE PROSECUTED and sent to jail. This bullshit is totally out of hand.

Agreed. There needs to be consequences to making unfounded accusations that ruin the lives of men like this. A deterrent.

 

[Bigfoot]

 

[MothMan]

How would Pelosi say it?

You have to make the accusation and ruin the persons life before we find a witness.

 

[MothMan]

CALL THE FUCKING VOTE!!

 

[MothMan]

3,2,1....

New Go Fund Me page for attorney Avenatti.

 

[MikeyCNY]

When Trumps next pick is a Woman will the Dems bring the same attack? Little Johnny where did the bad Judge touch you?

When RBG kicks the bucket and Judge Amy is nominated we'll find out. From what I hear/read she's even more conservative than Brett..

I really hope Judge Brett makes it through this; I can't imagine what his family is going through. What pieces of shit the Dems are, waiting months to bring this initial accusation out.. as others have said, it's all about DELAY, DELAY, DELAY. They think/hope that if they delay it until after the midterms, they might have a chance at taking the Senate, and then none of President Trump's picks will get voted in.

 

[livingston]

 

[livingston]