All this does is say that you spent money at a certain type of retailer. Not what you buy or how much. With a store like cabelas all they know is you spent $500 on something. Could be guns or ammo, could be camping equipment or fishing rods. NYS already knows when you buy guns or ammo in this state thanks to the POC background checks and pistol permits. If you buy out of state they have no way of knowing. Or you know just use a gift card or pay cash.
If you live in NY and NY has required that credit card companies and banks have to track what NY'ers buy and report that to NY, then they will still know what you bought out of state. That's the whole point to this.If you buy out of state they have no way of knowing.
If you live in NY and NY has required that credit card companies and banks have to track what NY'ers buy and report that to NY, then they will still know what you bought out of state. That's the whole point to this.
NY is making an end-run around the requirement that a warrant be issued for a person's private information, by requiring the credit card companies and banks to provide that information automatically.
The first time someone is arrested for buying ammo out of state they should sue the life out of the bank while at the same time filing a motion to have the evidence suppressed for violation of civil rights.
Not that they should even track that, but what you're saying is accurate. It just stays you bought something from someone who is a firearms dealer or a seller of ammo.All this does is say that you spent money at a certain type of retailer. Not what you buy or how much. With a store like cabelas all they know is you spent $500 on something. Could be guns or ammo, could be camping equipment or fishing rods. NYS already knows when you buy guns or ammo in this state thanks to the POC background checks and pistol permits. If you buy out of state they have no way of knowing. Or you know just use a gift card or pay cash.
The over reach is steadily increasing because SCOTUS doesn't do anything.
FWIW.
The Supreme Court handed down the DC v. Heller ruling and the NYSRPA v. Bruen ruling.
Those rulings may not be everything a gun owner/2A supporter wants. But both of those are pro-2A decisions.
The Supreme Court's problem is that it has no teeth. Or chooses not to have any teeth.
The court doesn't enforce its decisions, at least when it comes to the 2A.
Hochul and other blue state governors are allowed to blatantly violate US citizens' constitutional rights at will with no consequences. So, in a way, the Supreme Court not enforcing its rulings makes itself irrelevant. I'm pretty sure that's not how it's supposed to work.
The Bruen decision that included "text, history, and tradition" should have been game over for the civil rights-violating Democrat governors. But the tyrannical governors, such as Hochul show utter disrespect to the Supreme Court and our system of government. They give the Supreme Court justices the middle finger and sign even more draconian, unconstitutional gun control laws into law.
I'm rambling at this point, so I'll just say it seems like Hochul and those like her should be charged with civil rights violations. I'm not a constitutional scholar or a legal guru, so I may be incorrect about that. But it seems like common sense to me.
The supreme Court should be holding hochul in clear contempt of court.
If you're ever not sure, just rephrase the parties ask yourself this question, what would a liberal court do to Trump if he ignored and defied their ruling? They would obviously try to impeach him, hold him in contempt etc. Just uno-reverse that shit right back now to the liberal politicians who ignore gun rights SCOTUS cases. Why are they able to do so without any reprocussions?