NYS to the rescue, banning more food because of additives

[SomeSoldier]

Yes, the FDA needs to be disbanded.

If you can't tell what's in something, then don't eat it.

You can survive perfectly well buying things with only a single ingredient.

No question about what goes into "sirloin" or "potato".

You just have to give up the convenience of someone else doing most of the work cooking for you, and the unnaturally long shelf lives of the food.

So, don't bitch that you don't like all the ingredients of the boxed cake mix when there's flour, milk, and eggs sitting on the next shelf over.

If my tax dollars are paying for it. I can indeed bitch. When my money stops being stolen, I will stop complaining.

I eat better than most. I am constantly educating myself about nutrition.

 

[Grimscale]

No question about what goes into "sirloin"

Really?
Didn't you see the thread on here talking about adding mRNA to cattle?
Unless you grow it yourself and slaughter it yourself you have no idea what's in it.

 

[fresch]

What about the feed?

 

[SomeSoldier]

What about the feed?

This is very important. When cattle is feed grain their produce omega 6 fatty acids in their meat. When they are grass feed its omega 3. Omega 6 isn't good for you.

 

[libertysnake]

This is very important. When cattle is feed grain their produce omega 6 fatty acids in their meat. When they are grass feed its omega 3. Omega 6 isn't good for you.

It’s not so much omega-6 isn’t good, it’s that it competes for the same metabolic pathway as omega-3. So you should consume a much higher ratio of omega-3 to omega-6. It’s actually quite hard to do. Chia seed is the easiest way I’ve found to get a ton of omega-3 quickly for very few calories.

 

[SomeSoldier]

It’s not so much omega-6 isn’t good, it’s that it competes for the same metabolic pathway as omega-3. So you should consume a much higher ratio of omega-3 to omega-6. It’s actually quite hard to do. Chia seed is the easiest way I’ve found to get a ton of omega-3 quickly for very few calories.

If omega 6 doesn't help your body and omega 3 does but omega 6 blocks the spots for omega 3. Then omega 6 is not good for you. It's counter productive.

 

[libertysnake]

If omega 6 doesn't help your body and omega 3 does but omega 6 blocks the spots for omega 3. Then omega 6 is not good for you. It's counter productive.

Omega-6 is afaik mostly involved with the cellular level construction of your body. So it had a legit use. Many legit use minerals compete for pathways.

 

[spat]

If omega 6 doesn't help your body and omega 3 does but omega 6 blocks the spots for omega 3. Then omega 6 is not good for you. It's counter productive.

Nutrition is very seldom as simple as "this list is good and that list is bad".

 

[SomeSoldier]

I think it can get pretty close.

 

[1075tech]

View attachment 201483