What? You are on here denying a written released court decision. I am referencing 2 courts that upheld 10 rounds is the law and the state police and DA instructions stating the same. I am not going to argue with you. It is not debatable.
NYSRPA v. Bruen, NY 2A Case Supreme Court case and decision
- Thread starter ManualF150
- Start date
Phazer
.338 Win Mag
Ummm....if you think that it is your right to infringe on my rights then you are NOT right.
Question to any law enforcement. Did any of you receive an update to your penal law book, from which you charge people with a violation or crime, about the law being changed to 10 rds?
If it is still in the penal law book that the police carry around then, it's still a law. The police are just choosing to not enforce it.
She can go back to muskets if she feels like it.
I will not.
And the Supreme Court basically said "modern arms count".
so FUKH.
Greywolf224
6.5 Creedmoor
So if this is true what is all this hype about. There’s only approximately 1700 people who have the right to carry a gun in the five boroughs 1400 more have carry licenses issue by other counties that need New York City endorsement to carry in the five boroughs and approximately 16,462 city residents that have premises permits.
Are these the folks that are going to cause all future mass shootings and killings that are going to occur in New York City and the surrounding Burroughs?
I skimmed through the whole decision and to me it seems like while they are clear that "shall issue" licensing for concealed carry is allowed (as in 43 other states) the current NYS scheme of licensing to even purchase a handgun is unconstitutional and should be null and void. You should be allowed to purchase a handgun to keep in your home and to take locked to a range just as you can currently do with a rifle and shotgun. Anyone else reading this the same way?
I can quote the Constitution until I am blue in the face, that doesn't mean that anyone will follow it or enforce it.
"No amendment to the Constitution is absolute." -Joe Biden
Remarks by President Biden on Gun Violence Prevention | The White House
Rose Garden **Please see below for a correction, marked with an asterisk. THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Kamala — Madam Vice President. Thank you very much. You know, we’re joined today by the Attorney General, Merrick Garland, who I’ve asked to prioritize gun violence. It’s also good to see the...
spat
.700 Nitro Express
Or April 1775 when she sends goons to try to enforce it.
The hype is you dont have to show cause for a permit. Apply and be approved. It's basically must issue unless you're a dangerous person or criminal.
Phazer
.338 Win Mag
BINGO!
Court REJECTS 2-part approach for scrutiny.
Court REJECTS 2-part approach for scrutiny.
Not going down a rabbit hole with ya. Im sticking to the decision that was released today by SCOTUS.I can quote the Constitution until I am blue in the face, that doesn't mean that anyone will follow it or enforce it.
Remarks by President Biden on Gun Violence Prevention | The White House
Rose Garden **Please see below for a correction, marked with an asterisk. THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Kamala — Madam Vice President. Thank you very much. You know, we’re joined today by the Attorney General, Merrick Garland, who I’ve asked to prioritize gun violence. It’s also good to see the...www.whitehouse.gov
Greywolf224
6.5 Creedmoor
So for us that live outside of the five boroughs and cannot show legal residence in the five boroughs, does the amendment also become a must issue?
You can stick to whatever you want doesn't mean the government is going to follow it.
How did it work out for those people in Wako, Ruby Ridge, etc.?
Not clear yet.
Can you point to the specific page where you see them specifically addressing licenses to purchase or posses at home?
Agreed. I started to reply, then realized it was yahoo and it was pointless.
They just have not updated their laws yet. Per the decision you are free to ignore the mag limit. Laws are just outdated.
Confusion - that be the world today. Clarity and courts and laws a match is not. Who knows to where or what this ruling will lead - NO ONE DOES, not even the SP. Onward to another court and onward to vile bureaucrats to craft more convoluted nonsense.
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
I posted the actual PDF file from the NYSP showing the update shortly after the change was made. I dont have it on my pc anymore, that was about 5 OSs ago l.
4WHLDRFTN
.308 Win
That_FNG
.308 Win
How did it work out for the hundreds of Americans who went to the Bundy ranch and stood armed with the Bundys?
The penal code update to replace page x in their penal code books or just some pdf saying to ignore that law?
It didn't turn out well for LaRoy.
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
It was a PDF copy of the handbook given to NYSP saying to ignore the 7rd limit, the limit per court decision is 10rds.
Interesting but I still would like to hear what is current in the penal law.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
maverick52
.223 Rem
Objective licensing scheme refers to “shall issue”. Read Kavanaughs opinion
