NYSRPA v. Bruen, NY 2A Case Supreme Court case and decision

[ManualF150]

I bet that we will all of a sudden have another pandemic and SCOTUS will shut down before giving a decision.

I don't have high hopes from all that has transpired since the heated debate. Almost like all this crap leading up to it was sabotage on the court's decision making.

 

[Edwardteach72]

I bet that we will all of a sudden have another pandemic and SCOTUS will shut down before giving a decision.

I don't have high hopes from all that has transpired since the heated debate. Almost like all this crap leading up to it was sabotage on the court's decision making.

Lmfao.. wait you are joking right

 

[ManualF150]

Lmfao.. wait you are joking right

In this day and age? As the lottery says it... "Hey, you never know!"

 

[kev74]

I'll give you the 28th and I'll take the 30th. We do this as a team and that way we both win

Shake and bake!

 

[ArmedCorgi]

I'm actually hearing from troopers at the complexes I work at that it's gonna drop this week. What intel they have, I have no clue. It doesn't make any sense to me, considering the state of things, for the court to drop the opinion with one more week left. It makes much more sense for them to drop it next week.

 

[Edwardteach72]

I'm actually hearing from troopers at the complexes I work at that it's gonna drop this week. What intel they have, I have no clue. It doesn't make any sense to me, considering the state of things, for the court to drop the opinion with one more week left. It makes much more sense for them to drop it next week.

The only 2 things I can think of is the following

1) there is more than 2 landmark cases, so no just Bruen and Dobs, and so bruen may be the least "controversial"

2) (this is the one I like to think is why) tomorrow is Thomas's bday and it's a bday present to himself

Bonus (the most likely) the troopers have know idea what they are talking about and are just seeing what they see on reddit and other interwebs spots and think yea ok sure

 

[ArmedCorgi]

The only 2 things I can think of is the following

1) there is more than 2 landmark cases, so no just Bruen and Dobs, and so bruen may be the least "controversial"

2) (this is the one I like to think is why) tomorrow is Thomas's bday and it's a bday present to himself

Bonus (the most likely) the troopers have know idea what they are talking about and are just seeing what they see on reddit and other interwebs spots and think yea ok sure

It didn't come from patrolmen, it came a Captain. Again though, I don't know of how they would know other than looking at the court calender and speculating the same as us.
Which opinion do you think Thomas might drop tomorrow? Bruen?
What other landmark case is there?

 

[Darth]

Prepare for disappointment. Got it.

 

[Edwardteach72]

It didn't come from patrolmen, it came a Captain. Again though, I don't know of how they would know other than looking at the court calender and speculating the same as us.
Which opinion do you think Thomas might drop tomorrow? Bruen?
What other landmark case is there?

I don't think any landmarks will come tomorrow.

I just am making the joke that Thomas's birthday is tomorrow and he's been the most vocal about the 2A and what not,


But the other rumor is tomorrow being a conference day, they could want to read the rulings out loud live for Dobs and or Bruen


I'm still dead set that June 30th is the day

 

[Beerman]

The 28th is my birthday, and I’m used to disappointment. That makes decision day the 30th, or July something. Prepare for stall tactics and subterfuge. Stockpile beer, chips & salsa… it’s gonna be a little while.

 

[spat]

The only 2 things I can think of is the following

1) there is more than 2 landmark cases, so no just Bruen and Dobs, and so bruen may be the least "controversial"

2) (this is the one I like to think is why) tomorrow is Thomas's bday and it's a bday present to himself

Bonus (the most likely) the troopers have know idea what they are talking about and are just seeing what they see on reddit and other interwebs spots and think yea ok sure

There's at most a couple dozen people on the planet that probably know.

And after the shit show with the leak, I imagine they're not sharing anything else...

 

[ArmedCorgi]

The 28th is my birthday, and I’m used to disappointment. That makes decision day the 30th, or July something. Prepare for stall tactics and subterfuge. Stockpile beer, chips & salsa… it’s gonna be a little while.

July? Aren't they done end of June?

 

[Edwardteach72]

July? Aren't they done end of June?

They can extend into July if they want/need

 

[nobody]

Over the previous seven years, SCOTUS has...

Began June with an average of 28.3 opinions remaining on the docket.

Released an average of 4.6 opinions the first working week of June.
Released an average of 3.4 opinions the second working week of June.
Released an average of 9.9 opinions the third working week of June.
Released an average of 5.9 opinions the fourth working week of June.

A maximum of 6 opinions on any working day in June.

Never failed to make use of the fourth and final working week of June to release opinions.



So far this year, SCOTUS has...

Began June with 33 opinions remaining on the docket.

Released 4 opinions the first working week of June.
Released 11 opinions the second working week of June.
Released 5 opinions the third working week of June, with two opinion days remaining for the week.

A maximum of 6 opinions on any working day in June.

 

[BerettaGuy]

How Gun Control Law is rooted in and flourishes in racism.
It is also important to remember the Supreme Court also got slavery wrong with Dred Scott but that too was rooted in racism.
Racism and White Supremacy are on trial here as are Progressive Democrats.

Will the SCOTUS get it right? Or. Will they get it wrong, AGAIN!

Before continuing please remember that "democrats were paralyzed with fear at the thought of freed slaves with guns going back to the 1700's to the 1800s.
In the 60s Walter Cronkite and the other media conveyed the gaslighting that big black man with guns were about to invade the burbs and snatch white women to take them away. (Black Panthers exercising their 2A rights.)

The History of Racist Roots of Supreme Court Decisions!

United States v. Cruikshank: Ruled the Bill of Rights did not apply to private actors or to state governments despite the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. A racist decision made by racists.
The 1876 decision undercut the post-Civil War powers of the US government to protect civil rights by leaving it up to the states to empower white supremacy. The ruling vacated convictions of white defendants for depriving Blacks of their right to keep and bear arms, the court found the Second Amendment only applied to the US government.

Presser v. Illinois: The 1886 decision grew out of a march in Chicago of an unlicensed armed citizen militia, a group of armed ethnic German workers, associated with the Socialist Labor Party. The group had been formed to counter the armed private armies of companies in Chicago. aka Gangs

The court held that a state prohibition against such groups didn’t infringe on the right to keep and bear arms in again declining to apply the Second Amendment to the states.

United States v. Miller: A challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934. The 1939 decision overturning a district court said the National Firearms Act didn’t violate the Second Amendment. The case involved New Deal-era bank robbers charged with unlawfully transporting an unregistered sawed-off shotgun from Oklahoma to Arkansas. The court found that the type of weapon involved bore no relationship to the preservation of a well-regulated militia, and was not protected under the Second Amendment.

Finally a chance to correct the previous errors.

District of Columbia v. Heller: The landmark 2008 decision struck down a Washington, DC, handgun ban. The court said the Second Amendment protects individual gun rights unconnected with militia service, and endorsed their lawful possession for self-defense in the home. Current court conservatives Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito signed onto the decision by fellow conservative, the late Antonin Scalia. Justice Stephen Breyer, today a liberal member of the court in his last term, dissented.

McDonald v. Chicago: The 2010 decision struck down Chicago’s handgun ban, finding that Heller applied to individual states, not just federally. What wasn’t decided in the opinion written by Alito was whether the Second Amendment applied to gun ownership outside the home. Roberts and Clarence Thomas were the other members of the current court who comprised the majority.

The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott case struck down the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional, maintaining that Congress had no power to forbid or abolish slavery in the territories. Very similar to and prior to the 14th Amendment. The decision declared African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States.
The question is: Democrats do not want black Americans to own guns. To accomplish this in the 1800s was easy. Today, to accomplish this dream, they must restrict all guns from all Americans in the interest of equality fairness and unity don't you know.

Will the upcoming ruling be a landmark decision or a Dred Scott decision?
Will states and the lower courts give a flying shit?

Either way, why are Democrats and gun control zealots not labeled as the bigotted racist anti-American assholes that they are? Oh that's right, they are in control of the gas lighting.

 

[BerettaGuy]

WATCH PARTY ANYONE!
Live!

Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 23 (complete) - SCOTUSblog

On Thursday, June 23, we live blogged as the court released opinions in Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, Nance v. Ward, Vega v. Tekoh, and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. Click here for a list of FAQs about opinion announcements. <span data

www.scotusblog.com

 

[BuffNiag]

Here we go!

 

[Edwardteach72]

Set an hour aside today for the just in case

 

[ArmedCorgi]

So far just one posted

 

[Edwardteach72]

From what I gather. Is they post 1 opinion every 10 min.

 

[nortatoga]

From what I gather. Is they post 1 opinion every 10 min.

From what you gather, really LOL!!

• The Court may announce opinions on the homepage beginning at 10 a.m. If more than one opinion will be issued, they will post in approximately ten minute intervals. The Court will not take the Bench.

 

[Edwardteach72]

From what you gather, really LOL!!

• The Court may announce opinions on the homepage beginning at 10 a.m. If more than one opinion will be issued, they will post in approximately ten minute intervals. The Court will not take the Bench.

Is that on their page? Cause I haven't actually read the page just what I've seen on reddit and shit

 

[Edwardteach72]

Guess it is under the "building is closed to the public" part

 

[nortatoga]

Guess it is under the "building is closed to the public" part

Yes...

Today at the Court - Thursday, Jun 23, 2022​

---

Building closed to the public

• Out of concern for the health and safety of the public and Supreme Court employees, the Supreme Court Building will be closed to the public until further notice. The Building will remain open for official business. Please see all COVID-19 announcements here.
• The Court may announce opinions on the homepage beginning at 10 a.m. If more than one opinion will be issued, they will post in approximately ten minute intervals. The Court will not take the Bench.
• The Court will release an order list at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, June 27.
• All public lectures and visitor programs are temporarily suspended.

 

[ArmedCorgi]

From what I gather. Is they post 1 opinion every 10 min.

That's lame, lol. Why not all at once?

 

[Edwardteach72]

That's lame, lol. Why not all at once?

Honestly I get it. Logistics and uploading, and what not

 

[BerettaGuy]

The "live" site is having problems due to capacity.
The Roe gaslighting effect is what I call it.
People are up in arms because the court is about to rule that the killing of a baby which is the sum of two individuals gestating in the womb of a "female" can either be a crime or a progressive form of birth and population control. It is up to the individual states to decide.
The Gas-Lit version is the Supreme Court it taking rights away from women! But what is a woman? I am confused. I thought women and men were to be the same.
And then there is Bruin.

 

[BuffNiag]

I can’t believe how inconsequential all these other cases are. Let’s get to the good stuff!

 

[maverick52]

The "live" site is having problems due to capacity.
The Roe gaslighting effect is what I call it.
People are up in arms because the court is about to rule that the killing of a baby which is the sum of two individuals gestating in the womb of a "female" can either be a crime or a progressive form of birth and population control. It is up to the individual states to decide.
The Gas-Lit version is the Supreme Court it taking rights away from women! But what is a woman? I am confused. I thought women and men were to be the same.
And then there is Bruin.

The newspeak is “birthing person”

 

[BuffNiag]

It’s here!!!