SmallGameAddict
.308 Win
Actually after awhile she volunteered MAYBE...when we have $5.5k hanging around not spoken forYeah, no the price tag on that is beserko-nuts.
It's a toy for the rich bitch crowd.
Actually after awhile she volunteered MAYBE...when we have $5.5k hanging around not spoken forYeah, no the price tag on that is beserko-nuts.
It's a toy for the rich bitch crowd.
Well....one is made from Martha Stewart's vagina and the other isn't.I fell like $5,500 is just totally unneeded and out of the ballpark. I fell like once you get past a certain point you just don’t get much gain. What’s the difference between a $3,000 rifle and a $5,500 rifle? Can’t be that significant. Maybe I’m wrong.
Ah, but its all perspective now. Suddenly $2,500 plus optics etc seems VERY reasonable to the wife.... lol.Just remembered to show my wife the pic...and cost.
Pretty sure her look said not at this time. Or next time.
Truth!Ah, but its all perspective now. Suddenly $2,500 plus optics etc seems VERY reasonable to the wife.... lol.
Look honey, I'm so FRUGAL!!! HAHA!Truth!
$1,000 of the price is from the barrel which is this weird hybrid sleeved with resin filling thing. Its also a proprietary receiver set since it is the AR equivalent of a long action. Also the handguard is out of 7075 aluminum as opposed to 6061 alloy almost every other manufacturer uses. Its also a low production run item. It's like getting an Accuracy International or a Sako TRG, it's about the highest of the highest end of AR rifles. I think they should do a .338 Lapua model though, of you are gonna go stupid bucks on a rifle like that you may as well go for broke I says.I fell like $5,500 is just totally unneeded and out of the ballpark. I fell like once you get past a certain point you just don’t get much gain. What’s the difference between a $3,000 rifle and a $5,500 rifle? Can’t be that significant. Maybe I’m wrong.
Agreed. No regrets.$1,000 of the price is from the barrel which is this weird hybrid sleeved with resin filling thing. Its also a proprietary receiver set since it is the AR equivalent of a long action. Also the handguard is out of 7075 aluminum as opposed to 6061 alloy almost every other manufacturer uses. Its also a low production run item. It's like getting an Accuracy International or a Sako TRG, it's about the highest of the highest end of AR rifles. I think they should do a .338 Lapua model though, of you are gonna go stupid bucks on a rifle like that you may as well go for broke I says.
I'm leaning towards the Centurion Arms Lightweight M4. At any rate I've got plenty of time to think it over.So...... you're getting a Colt, right?
Only two reasons...My thoughts are this D, you're into it for $1k, why not spend $500 more?
OkOnly two reasons...
1: As with every AR I've built or bought, I always end up spending more to upgrade it from it's original configuration (even if it had everything I wanted at the time). I've bought AR's and ended up upgrading everything on them to the point that the only thing left of the original was the barrel. So that extra $500, would set you up nice for your own personal upgrades as you see fit over time. AR's are all the same at their core.
2: It's a Colt.
We all say that.Ok
The only upgrades I foresee are...
1) the trigger. A piss poor trigger drives me nuts.
2) A suppressor
As far as modifying an AR, of that I am uncertain. I confess to modifying my bolt-actions. I look at them, get a vision and see more potential with various doodads.We all say that.
Seriously though, unless you are the type who likes to leave it alone, you will get the bug to modify the gun.
I'm not advocating for Colt necessarily. I know that there are better options. I've just always been skeptical of spending 2k on an AR. I'll spend 2k on an AR, that I put together, but not one from a manufacturer. AR's are just too easy to build to be spending that kind of money on an off the shelf deal.
And you don't need to spend 2k off the bat for that level of quality in an AR.A reliable weapon, well made and adequately accurate with a good trigger will suit me. It will be hanging above the front door. In case of emergency break glass.
If you are modifying bolt actions, modifying AR's will be like taking candy from a baby.I confess to modifying my bolt-actions. I look at them, get a vision and see more potential with various doodads.
Duly noted. All input and opinions from trusted knowledgeable individuals highly valued.And you don't need to spend 2k off the bat for that level of quality in an AR.
If you are modifying bolt actions, modifying AR's will be like taking candy from a baby.
All based on Colt's TDP. Do either of those companies have or ever have had a military contract to build the m4?And again with a reputable manufacturer (like Centurion Arms and Daniel Defense) you can be assured that all the tolerances, all the fasteners and everything else is properly assembled, installed and torqued to the proper specs.
And I say that, with the understanding that Colt isn't the end all be all. That other companies have pulled past Colt's level. I just find it funny that at one point Colt was the standard and now it's considered on the level of Delton. Granted, as a company, they have made very dumb decisions and yes, have most likely rested on their laurels way too much. Fact remains they bought the design from Armalite and developed the TDP on the platform that all other companies have based their product off of. That has to count for something.All based on Colt's TDP. Do either of those companies have or ever have had a military contract to build the m4?
The owner of Centurion Arms Monty LeClair was the one that defined the original specs for the Mk12 SPR during his time as a SEAL. His company also manufactured tge first runs of the Mk 12 but had to contract them out to PRI as he didn't have tge production capacity at the time.All based on Colt's TDP. Do either of those companies have or ever have had a military contract to build the m4?
So tell me, who's rifle did I really buy when I bought my Colt?Which is all moot anyways since Colt stopped selling new manufacture AR15s anyway.
The problem with Colt is they just didn't keep up with the demands of the civilIan market which has always been that company's MO all along which is why they are now owned by CZ. The real shame is that Colt had a few AR models that would have down very well in the civilIan market had they just made them available. It's too late now.And I say that, with the understanding that Colt isn't the end all be all. That other companies have pulled past Colt's level. I just find it funny that at one point Colt was the standard and now it's considered on the level of Delton. Granted, as a company, they have made very dumb decisions and yes, have most likely rested on their laurels way too much. Fact remains they bought the design from Armalite and developed the TDP on the platform that all other companies have based their product off of. That has to count for something.
When did you buy it? The wholesale subcontracting didn't start until relatively recently.So tell me, who's rifle did I really buy when I bought my Colt?
I totally agree. Colt has made very bad business decisions. They likely got arrogant.The problem with Colt is they just didn't keep up with the demands of the civilIan market which has always been that company's MO all along which is why they are now owned by CZ. The real shame is that Colt had a few AR models that would have down very well in the civilIan market had they just made them available. It's too late now.
I can also remember a time when Bushmaster was considerd the Cadillac to Colt's Chevy. Which just goes to show that people's perceptions are often inconsistent and not particularly reliable.I totally agree. Colt has made very bad business decisions. They likely got arrogant.
That said, holding the Colt that I bought in my hands, I can tell it's a quality rifle. It's not a piece if shit in the slightest.
June of this year. I believe the rifle was made in October of last year. All the research I've done leads to more questions than answers. If there is one thing I have found to be consistent about Colt's manufacturing in recent years, it's that they are inconsisent in markings. Cage numbers here, a "c" there, dates on the barrel or no dates. People are hung up on this shit like it's life or death. Very few companies make everything in house. Colt is no different now that they no longer make rifles for the US military.When did you buy it? The wholesale subcontracting didn't start until relatively recently.
My point exactly!I can also remember a time when Bushmaster was considerd the Cadillac to Colt's Chevy. Which just goes to show that people's perceptionseems are often inconsistent and not particularly reliable.
I tell you what though, Centurion Arms and Daniel Defense do make an excellent product and both have outstanding customer service. I can personally attest to that on both counts.My point exactly!