Pleasant Valley, NY CT Woman Arrested Weapon Possession !
- Thread starter GOYABEAN
- Start date
Celt
.338 Win Mag
this is another prime example of why we need national reciprocity.
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Yeah any so called violation will do 
New York State Police Newsroom: Bridgeport Connecticut woman arrested for gun possession
New York State Police Newsroom: Bridgeport Connecticut woman arrested for gun possession
Sorry @GOYABEAN but neither link says if she was legal to have a pistol (Licensed!) in her home state!!
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
I know but it's
kingdom so even if she does have CCP in which ever state I'm sure she would still be facing changes 
I know but it's
You should really read Heller v DC!! Which at this time is the law of the land!!
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
the one that should have read it is 
C3D
.308 Win
Poughkeepsie Journal reports the firearm was a Ruger 9E.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
Not in FUAC's or ChristyCupCake's Kingdom
Mr. terzmo
.308 Win
I know but it's
Depending on how she transported it. Anyone with a CC knows the law on carry/transport responsibility. Like it or not, she didn't follow the rules. If a legal CC more info is needed for any speculation. People with with legal CC that screw up, just make it worse for the rest of US. My 2 cents
Yeah, let's all blame the poor sap that is caught in our unConstitutional Law. After all, she should have known that New York was a Draconian regime hell bent on oppressing and enslaving its citizens.
while we're at it, let's justify the infringement on her Rights because we don't like that she broke traffic law. That must make her a "bad person", so the tyrannical regime can punish her to their heart's content, while setting precedent against those of us who live here.
That makes sense.
while we're at it, let's justify the infringement on her Rights because we don't like that she broke traffic law. That must make her a "bad person", so the tyrannical regime can punish her to their heart's content, while setting precedent against those of us who live here.
That makes sense.
Day444
.223 Rem
Here we go again!
LMAO...
Although the repressive regime currently in place in Cuomostan is as ugly as it gets, there's much to this story that isn't being published, ie, cause for the stop and subsequent "investigation" which revealed the weapon.
And honestly, I don't think anyone or everyone carrying a firearm gets a free pass just because this State sux... If ya feel that way why don't you just go to your nearest hoodlum hangout and pass out free 9mm ammo? Fuck it, pass out Teflon coated rounds too...
But I won't judge, there's more to this than obviously being told, and we weren't there so we can speculate all we want! I'll wait for it all to come out, but like I posted earlier, if she hadn't committed "MULTIPLE" violations of justification for the stop, we wouldn't be discussing it at all. It really is that simple!
Now, if the story was something like the NYSP set up a border checkpoint @ CT crossings for the purpose of inspecting vehicles for any illegal contraband, criminal migrants, drugs, DWI, weapons, etc, well then, maybe we could have a discussion on how fucked up that is...
Go ahead, flame on! Lol
Although the repressive regime currently in place in Cuomostan is as ugly as it gets, there's much to this story that isn't being published, ie, cause for the stop and subsequent "investigation" which revealed the weapon.
And honestly, I don't think anyone or everyone carrying a firearm gets a free pass just because this State sux... If ya feel that way why don't you just go to your nearest hoodlum hangout and pass out free 9mm ammo? Fuck it, pass out Teflon coated rounds too...
But I won't judge, there's more to this than obviously being told, and we weren't there so we can speculate all we want! I'll wait for it all to come out, but like I posted earlier, if she hadn't committed "MULTIPLE" violations of justification for the stop, we wouldn't be discussing it at all. It really is that simple!
Now, if the story was something like the NYSP set up a border checkpoint @ CT crossings for the purpose of inspecting vehicles for any illegal contraband, criminal migrants, drugs, DWI, weapons, etc, well then, maybe we could have a discussion on how fucked up that is...
Go ahead, flame on! Lol
Connecticut plates are common for illegals. Look at the name... Definitely a strong possibility.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
It's funny how some here are okay with the violation of her rights because she should have known or was driving recklessly.
Had the founding fathers been here now, they'd want her gun rights not to be violated yet the brainwashed here are totally okay with it.
According to how the Constitution is written, she was supposed to be issued summonses for the moving violations and or arrested if there was another crime committed and her gun was supposed to be treated the same as her pocket knife and lipstick. It's supposed to be ignored. If she was arrested for something else, it was supposed to be vouchered along with her lipstick and other items in her purse to be returned to her after her detainment is over. If there was no crime committed, the moving violation summonses were supposed to be issued without a search of the vehicle or her person.
Had the founding fathers been here now, they'd want her gun rights not to be violated yet the brainwashed here are totally okay with it.
According to how the Constitution is written, she was supposed to be issued summonses for the moving violations and or arrested if there was another crime committed and her gun was supposed to be treated the same as her pocket knife and lipstick. It's supposed to be ignored. If she was arrested for something else, it was supposed to be vouchered along with her lipstick and other items in her purse to be returned to her after her detainment is over. If there was no crime committed, the moving violation summonses were supposed to be issued without a search of the vehicle or her person.
FYI, Bridgeport is one of the highest crime communities in the country. Dollars to donuts she’s a perp.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Other than the gun charge, was she arrested for a crime?
So is the Bronx. I'm from there.
We dont know. But you seem to be of the understanding that her gun was legal in CT.
10k bail is a lot, even for a gun. There’s more to her story that a law-abiding CT resident “accidentally” crossing into NY with her legally owned firearm.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
This misunderstood Kingston "yout" got a 100k bond for a gun possession charge just across the river about the same time. But she only had a 9mm Ruger 9e and he may have had a Glock . Again gotta be more to the story.
Kingston, NY 18 Year Old Arrested Gun Possession !
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
My parents grew up on Gun Hill Road, but that was way before it was in the state it currently is...
All I got out of it was a little bit of Bronx accent that I picked up from them, mostly when I'm pissed awff.
Celt
.338 Win Mag
If she was a prohibited person and an ACTUAL criminal then no problem. If she was simply violating some vtl's and somehow got pinched for carrying a legal to possess firearm, then fuck that!
I agree, but it’s doubtful. If it walks like a duck...
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
I think we should just wait till the facts are in here. We don't know if there is a legal reason they're prohibited, beyond the (unconstitutional) reason of a license.
What violation of Rights? Driving a motor vehicle is a privilege and with that privilege a person driving in, or through New York and many States submits to "Implied Consent"... Forget about plain view, lmao! Do we know if, when, how, where the firearm was found?
What is amazing is the lengths to which people want to expand a person's so called "Rights" without knowing any details of the so called violations or offense. There are many liberties being taken absent knowledge and too much latitude given, evident here in some posts. Everyone wants to make LE the bad guys, when usually, that is 99.8% of the time, the furthest thing from reality! Stupid people deserve stupid prizes, and whether ignorant of NY laws, or just blatantly disregarding them, she was stopped for a reason, and that reason wasn't just because! With the almost million miles I've driven in my lifetime, I've never once been stopped for "nothing"... ever! The founding fathers provided notation on particular Rights, of which the ability to keep and bear arms is well discussed here. That said, that is not the cause in-fact of the stop, the firearm discovery was whipped cream on the pudding, not the pudding itself!
Talking about "Rights" did she invoked them or not? How does anyone know she did or didn't consent to a search? Are you aware the SCOTUS has noted that "Rights" aren't automatic or expected, that "YOU" need to exercise/invoke them, in order to have them? Did she? And does that make a difference? No, of course not at the time, well... not at least until she further exercises her Rights by demanding a Trial for her offenses, lol. We can debate, all day(s), on a million different scenarios based upon speculation, might as well write a fantasy book while we're at it.
I'm all for Rights, I'm not for using that as a "get out of jail" free card, or just because, then I can do whatever I want!
No, sorry!
What is amazing is the lengths to which people want to expand a person's so called "Rights" without knowing any details of the so called violations or offense. There are many liberties being taken absent knowledge and too much latitude given, evident here in some posts. Everyone wants to make LE the bad guys, when usually, that is 99.8% of the time, the furthest thing from reality! Stupid people deserve stupid prizes, and whether ignorant of NY laws, or just blatantly disregarding them, she was stopped for a reason, and that reason wasn't just because! With the almost million miles I've driven in my lifetime, I've never once been stopped for "nothing"... ever! The founding fathers provided notation on particular Rights, of which the ability to keep and bear arms is well discussed here. That said, that is not the cause in-fact of the stop, the firearm discovery was whipped cream on the pudding, not the pudding itself!
Talking about "Rights" did she invoked them or not? How does anyone know she did or didn't consent to a search? Are you aware the SCOTUS has noted that "Rights" aren't automatic or expected, that "YOU" need to exercise/invoke them, in order to have them? Did she? And does that make a difference? No, of course not at the time, well... not at least until she further exercises her Rights by demanding a Trial for her offenses, lol. We can debate, all day(s), on a million different scenarios based upon speculation, might as well write a fantasy book while we're at it.
I'm all for Rights, I'm not for using that as a "get out of jail" free card, or just because, then I can do whatever I want!
No, sorry!
Celt
.338 Win Mag
Well one could argue that driving is not a privilege since we are forced to pay taxes to maintain roads and other aspects of the highway system in general. However we (society) have been indoctrinated to believe that it is a privilege when in fact many would argue that we have a right to drive. And I would tend to agree.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
It's supposed to be so per the Constitution unless that doesn't mean anything.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I have every right to drive the same as a man had the right to ride his horse without a license unless there is no such thing as a natural freedom of movement.