spat
.700 Nitro Express
That's the point.Of course not. But lawsuits are only starting . But why are these laws necessary? So if you were infected with a real deadly disease like smallpox or Marrburg do you think you should be allowed to spread it?
And yes , I have had to make that choice. We have had prisoners who were HIV positive but their significant other had no idea. By law , I couldn’t tell them .
What would you do?
Not so black and white when they had to tell you so they could get their necessary medical treatment. Remember, They were prisoners. Compelled “testimony “.
As far as getting a civil suit, it’s habeas corpus . Not a normal lawsuit. It takes as fast as it is in getting any other hearing including arraignments. It means it’s done in days at most especially if there is no arraignment.
Guys learn the law and what redress you actually have. These things are not as black and white as one might believe.
3 years ago now, and lawsuits are only starting.
Also, we aren't talking about quarantining infected people. That's not what was done during covid, and it's not what NY wants now.
Or do you not remember that *everyone* was locked down, with no effective redress.
And even now that people are *finally* getting the courts to say the actions of government were illegal, there is still no real redress.
The people who illegally closed the churches have absolutely no repercussions, and the churches that were illegally closed have no remuneration.
So, let's see, your church was illegally closed for a year, during exactly the sort of conditions people *need* that service. Now, after tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees all you get is an admission that they shouldn't have done that ?
If you think that's an effective redress of those grievances, you're delusional.
If you think it won't be even worse next time, there's no helping you.