Remington Asset Bids Revealed: Ruger Gets Marlin, Vista Gets Remington Ammo, Franklin Armory Gets Bushmaster, Sierra Gets Barnes

Podmonkey

Podmonkey

.577 Tyrannosaur.
U.S. Military
Messages
20,813
Reaction score
28,722
Location
Cambria co. PA
Vapor said:
Its not so much the lines as it is very ugly bluing and very bland wood.
Click to expand...
That's why I spec'd a parked fish and either polymer or laminate furniture on that dream lever gun I laid out. Simple and hard to screw up. I happen to think park on wood is very sharp, very old school military.
In this age I think bluing is best left to fancy, presentation grade/collectable stuff.
Though I do love the looks of a finely blued revolver in wood grips.
 
BDinPutnam

BDinPutnam

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,492
Reaction score
20,850
Location
Someplace else
Podmonkey said:
Actually, I have a product suggestion.

Its possible to do ugly in such a way that it ends up looking good. If form follows good function it usally ends up looking good.
The 336 for example is an honest working man's gun with those traditional lines but they also give you that side eject and the pistol grip style stock which are more functional than the top eject and straight grip stock of some of their competitors.
Click to expand...

I actually prefer not only the function but also the look of the pistol grip.
 
JackNeat

JackNeat

.45 acp
Messages
358
Reaction score
575
Location
Rockland NY
Whoever was in charge of running Remington lived under a rock. I guess they didn't know guns are pretty popular now and they could have found a way to stay out of bankruptcy... :banghead:
 
Podmonkey

Podmonkey

.577 Tyrannosaur.
U.S. Military
Messages
20,813
Reaction score
28,722
Location
Cambria co. PA
What boggles my mind is why companies such as Remington and Winchester thought it was okay to ignore the market and allow their product lines to stagnate and slip into obscurity while companies such as Smith & Wesson, Savage and Ruger stayed with and listened to the market and are doing very well.
I won't include Colt since corporate incompetence has clearly been written into the company charter since the beginning.

Winchester will be the next to fall, the only thing keeping them in the green right now is the government ammunition contract to run the LC plant. I wonder whose dick Winchester had to suck to pull that off?
 
cgrutt

cgrutt

.338 Win Mag
NYGF Vendor
Monthly Donor
Messages
8,877
Reaction score
16,721
Location
Interwebz
JackNeat said:
Whoever was in charge of running Remington lived under a rock. I guess they didn't know guns are pretty popular now and they could have found a way to stay out of bankruptcy... :banghead:
Click to expand...
Podmonkey said:
What boggles my mind is why companies such as Remington and Winchester thought it was okay to ignore the market and allow their product lines to stagnate and slip into obscurity while companies such as Smith & Wesson, Savage and Ruger stayed with and listened to the market and are doing very well.
I won't include Colt since corporate incompetence has clearly been written into the company charter since the beginning.

Winchester will be the next to fall, the only thing keeping them in the green right now is the government ammunition contract to run the LC plant. I wonder whose dick Winchester had to suck to pull that off?
Click to expand...


Little dated (2017) but they were carrying over $1.3B in debt, including about $100M in retirement and product liability obligations against an asset base of only $850M (excludes about $100M in goodwill and intangibles). Hard to sell your way out of that with a product that generally retails well under $1000...

 
meketrefe

meketrefe

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
12,807
Reaction score
16,327
Location
Dexter, ME
Remington management were a disaster. They pretty much sabotaged every single project and initiative for the last 20 years.
30 Rar wrong bolt choice and marketing failure.
They invented the 6.8 SPC and abandoned that, thanks god ARP, wilson combat, LWRC, SSI, Federal and others came to the rescue with a 6.8 SPCII chamber, rifles and ammo.
They took msrlin and messed up quite a few rifles.
The 7-08 another amazing round that was a total marketing failure from Remington Whoever has this round knows how good it is including long range. Thanks god other ammo and rifle makers took notice and created a great assortment of rifles and ammo but long range rifles and ammo are very few for this round.
Should we continue?
 
Podmonkey

Podmonkey

.577 Tyrannosaur.
U.S. Military
Messages
20,813
Reaction score
28,722
Location
Cambria co. PA
cgrutt said:
Little dated (2017) but they were carrying over $1.3B in debt, including about $100M in retirement and product liability obligations against an asset base of only $850M (excludes about $100M in goodwill and intangibles). Hard to sell your way out of that with a product that generally retails well under $1000...

Click to expand...
If they exploited the "Gun Culture 2.0" market, Remington might've had the capital weather that storm and restructure.
 
T

tony

.223 Rem
Messages
1,453
Reaction score
1,896
Location
the dark side of the room
I may be mistaken but Winchester rifles are presently being produced by Browning. If you can find a New Haven Winchester that is a good thing. Winchester was sold to the employees which marketed them under the US Repeating Arms Co. brand (USRAC). USRAC made some money saving changes at the cost of the product quality. I believe they only lasted 6 years before Winchester was sold again.
 
Podmonkey

Podmonkey

.577 Tyrannosaur.
U.S. Military
Messages
20,813
Reaction score
28,722
Location
Cambria co. PA
tony said:
I may be mistaken but Winchester rifles are presently being produced by Browning. If you can find a New Haven Winchester that is a good thing. Winchester was sold to the employees which marketed them under the US Repeating Arms Co. brand (USRAC). USRAC made some money saving changes at the cost of the product quality. I believe they only lasted 6 years before Winchester was sold again.
Click to expand...
I always thought it was the reverse. You're probably right however. Still, how is Browning doing? I assume its just a name owned by a corporate holding outfit at this point. Maybe that is the problem, these historic brands getting bought out by entities that have no understanding of firearms, thinking iron and wood guns from the cowboy era are all anybody will want or that that's all the they think guns are. A firearms company must have modern offerings to stay relevant.
 
Edwardteach72

Edwardteach72

.475 A&M Magnum
U.S. Military
Messages
14,883
Reaction score
15,065
Location
New York
Podmonkey said:
I always thought it was the reverse. You're probably right however. Still, how is Browning doing? I assume its just a name owned by a corporate holding outfit at this point. Maybe that is the problem, these historic brands getting bought out by entities that have no understanding of firearms, thinking iron and wood guns from the cowboy era are all anybody will want or that that's all the they think guns are. A firearms company must have modern offerings to stay relevant.
Click to expand...


To be fair Remington jumped head first pretty fast into the whole "MSR" concept and started a line of hunting AR10s... they didn't seem to do so well
 
Vapor

Vapor

.308 Win
Messages
4,074
Reaction score
7,503
Location
Susky county PA
Podmonkey said:
I always thought it was the reverse. You're probably right however. Still, how is Browning doing? I assume its just a name owned by a corporate holding outfit at this point. Maybe that is the problem, these historic brands getting bought out by entities that have no understanding of firearms, thinking iron and wood guns from the cowboy era are all anybody will want or that that's all the they think guns are. A firearms company must have modern offerings to stay relevant.
Click to expand...


Browning and Winchester rifles are owned my FN last I knew.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top