I get carrying the gun with him. But leaving it out is terribly irresponsible.Too much stupid on this one.
Why is a housing bureau officer taking his firearm to his neighbors' apartment?!? Much less leaving it on the neighbors' coffee table?!?
Yes. Even better if we teach them as children.So now we have to educate adults to not play with firearms?!
So now we have to educate adults to not play with firearms?!
Police officer should not have left unattended obviously.
Why is he as much to blame if he was uneducated about firearms? Yes there is blame to go around but the truth of the matter is the officer had been trained in securing his weapon and my guess is the deceased had not been so trained; although, that is only a guess.I get carrying the gun with him. But leaving it out is terribly irresponsible.
The article says the friend picked it up and it accidentally went off. That is so ridiculous, the idiot picked it up and put his finger on the trigger causing his own death because of ignorance. He is just as much to blame for picking it up and putting his finger on the trigger as the rookie is for leaving it out and unattended.
Fair point regarding blame. But, even if the guy is ignorant to firearms, just about everyone on the planet knows they are dangerous and that triggers make them go boom.Why is he as much to blame if he was uneducated about firearms? Yes there is blame to go around but the truth of the matter is the officer had been trained in securing his weapon and my guess is the deceased had not been so trained; although, that is only a guess.
Of course, the reason the gun may have fired is MAYBE because the officer tried to grab his gun away from his friend and reflex reaction often is to grasp something tighter that someone else is trying to take from you and in the case of a gun that could mean a bang. It certainly seems odd, not impossible but odd, that some picking up a gun to check it out, or whatever, and then discharging it, would shoot himself in the neck unless he was suicidal.
Whatever the reason the man was shot - it never would have happened if the gun had not been left there loaded for him to pick up. Well, that is if the officer did not shoot his friend either accidentally or on purpose.
My point in saying all that is just to show other sides, not to argue. The truth of the matter is that there needs to be a thorough investigation of what happened and then the facts supported by the evidence should be relied upon to make a determination as to what happened. That is usually preferable to believing what a reporter wrote when determining what happened in such an instance.
Is it possible this Ghanaian chap wasn't a high scorer on the civil service exam?Something tells me he probably shouldn't have been a PO to begin with .
No it doesn't work that way. A score on a civil service exam is a score on a civil service exam. What they do is disqualify candidates on the psychological exam. That's how they pick and choose who they want to hire. They get letters saying that their psychological profile did not fit the needs of the Police Department. I know of three people that got that letter. All happened to already be New York City peace officers working for hospital police in NYC. Two of them were veterans. One Army and one Marine. The other wasn't a veteran but was a stand-up guy. He eventually became a Paramedic.Is it possible this Ghanaian chap wasn't a high scorer on the civil service exam?