Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dies At 87

L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
50,609
Reaction score
138,003
Location
livingston county
Thumbnail
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
50,609
Reaction score
138,003
Location
livingston county
Grimscale said:
Here's the thing...
If Trump DOESN'T nominate, I will see it as a political ploy to try to garner votes. I'm tired of these political games.

I want to see a nomination before the end of this coming week.


Then McConnell needs to fast-track the vote.

This will actually HELP Trump, since it will clearly demonstrate the lengths the Democrats will go toward rigging the election. They will want Biden in there so they can "pack the Court".
And such attempts to cheat the election and, if they steal it, pack the Court will be further evidence of the breakdown of Society.

At that point... Civil War. It will push the otherwise law-abiding Conservatives over the edge.
Click to expand...
Trump has been fucked over by the left so much.... He sould announce his pick before she is planted .
 
Cooolone

Cooolone

.338 Win Mag
Messages
6,295
Reaction score
9,747
Location
NY, USA
livingston said:
Thumbnail
Click to expand...

Awwwwww, isn't that cute...

Where the fuck is this assholes head buried? The country has been shut down with the exception of Republicans trying to get things going! His statement is moronic!

But this is all expected, vote, don't vote... Doesn't matter. Results are contrary to what the progressive liberals want, they will protest, stomp their feet, hold their breath till blue because it's their nature! Just like their attempts to change the electoral college because it didn't work out for them last election... Boo hoo hoo... Can only imagine the amount of bedlem coming when Trump wins!
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
50,609
Reaction score
138,003
Location
livingston county
Markey threatens to pack Supreme Court, abolish filibuster if Trump fills seat
Nine justices have served on the nation's highest court since 1869
A leading Democrat in the U.S. Senate came out in support of "packing" the U.S. Supreme Court and eliminating the Senate filibuster if Majority Leader Mitch McConnell works to confirm a potential nominee to fill the seat left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Washington Post blogger Greg Sargent agreed, saying that Senate Democrats would have "no choice but to nuke the [legislative] filibuster and try to pack the court."


"Not doing this won't be an option," he tweeted.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has been cagey when pressed about Democratic plans for the filibuster should his party secure a net gain of four seats and flip Senate control.
www.foxnews.com

Markey threatens to pack Supreme Court, abolish filibuster if Trump fills seat

A leading Democrat in the U.S. Senate came out in support of "packing" the U.S. Supreme Court and eliminating the Senate filibuster if Majority Leader Mitch McConnell works to confirm a potential nominee to fill the seat left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
Blimey

Blimey

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
11,278
Reaction score
16,252
Location
Western NY
livingston said:
Markey threatens to pack Supreme Court, abolish filibuster if Trump fills seat
Nine justices have served on the nation's highest court since 1869
A leading Democrat in the U.S. Senate came out in support of "packing" the U.S. Supreme Court and eliminating the Senate filibuster if Majority Leader Mitch McConnell works to confirm a potential nominee to fill the seat left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Washington Post blogger Greg Sargent agreed, saying that Senate Democrats would have "no choice but to nuke the [legislative] filibuster and try to pack the court."


"Not doing this won't be an option," he tweeted.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has been cagey when pressed about Democratic plans for the filibuster should his party secure a net gain of four seats and flip Senate control.
www.foxnews.com

Markey threatens to pack Supreme Court, abolish filibuster if Trump fills seat

A leading Democrat in the U.S. Senate came out in support of "packing" the U.S. Supreme Court and eliminating the Senate filibuster if Majority Leader Mitch McConnell works to confirm a potential nominee to fill the seat left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
So if he doesn't fill it they pinky promise not to pack it anyway? Yeah, right. They will do whatever they can. It's time we started doing the same.

One thing is for sure: if you want a fair fight but the other side plays dirty you better catch up on the rules real quick or else you'll lose. In this case, there is nothing whatsoever unprecedented about a president nominating a justice and the senate confirming. The fact it's an election year is really irrelevant. THe biden rule was always a joke, and everybody knew it.
 
Celt

Celt

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
9,820
Reaction score
20,428
Location
Westchester
livingston said:
GOP Senator Lisa Murkowski announces she will NOT vote to replace RBG on SCOTUS until after Election Day, saying, "fair is fair."
— Stephanie Myers (@_StephanieMyers) September 19, 2020

Fair is not in a liberals vocabulary .... Why the hell are we worried about it on such an important issue. Fair.. they tried to overthrow the president... Half of them should be hung for sedition .
Click to expand...
Shes a moron, its not "fair is fair" fair would be is it was a demoncrat controlled senate with a repub pres.
 
Robin

Robin

.577 Tyrannosaur.
Messages
20,521
Reaction score
44,459
Location
Livingston County
Sick of ignorant assholes like her.
They're going to have to color code the rioters so we can tell who's who, how is anyone to know whether your burning down the city for the scum bag rapist, the drugged up guy, the oversized thug kid, the crazed knife wielder, the Ruthie thing, c'mon, even sports teams color code.
Robin
 
TEOTWAWKI inc.

TEOTWAWKI inc.

.338 Win Mag
Messages
7,446
Reaction score
15,342
Location
Tennessee, U.S.A.
livingston said:
Obama Statement on Ginsburg Demands GOP Senate Honors Her Dying ‘Instructions’ and Put Off Vote on Supreme Court Nominee Until New President Sworn In
Former President Barack Obama issued a statement late Friday night on the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The statement was posted to the online site Medium.

In the statement, Obama demanded the Republican controlled Senate not vote on any replacement for Ginsburg until a new president is sworn following the November presidential election. Obama cited his failed 2016 nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to back up his support for Ginsburg’s reported dying “instructions” that her replacement be nominated by a new president (“My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.”)

Four and a half years ago, when Republicans refused to hold a hearing or an up-or-down vote on Merrick Garland, they invented the principle that the Senate shouldn’t fill an open seat on the Supreme Court before a new president was sworn in.

A basic principle of the law — and of everyday fairness — is that we apply rules with consistency, and not based on what’s convenient or advantageous in the moment. The rule of law, the legitimacy of our courts, the fundamental workings of our democracy all depend on that basic principle. As votes are already being cast in this election, Republican Senators are now called to apply that standard. The questions before the Court now and in the coming years — with decisions that will determine whether or not our economy is fair, our society is just, women are treated equally, our planet survives, and our democracy endures — are too consequential to future generations for courts to be filled through anything less than an unimpeachable process.
Click to expand...

Fuck fairness. Fight to win. And, BHO is not in charge anymore. Nothing he says matters.

Blimey said:
But isn't that because the republicans humored them?

I can't find out how quickly the senate actually CAN get this done if they are truly motivated to do it within, say, 30 days.
Click to expand...

They should be able to get it done by Monday. Why does this need to take months?
 
MothMan

MothMan

.338 Win Mag
Messages
7,000
Reaction score
12,703
Location
Point Pleasant, WV
kev74 said:
The President has to nominate someone for appointment. The Senate has to confirm the nomination.

There is no reason this process has to take 3 months. If McConnell can do his job and get this on the floor for a vote in a timely fashion -without all the nonsense and foot-dragging he permitted during Gorsuch and Kavanaugh's hearings, our biggest concern will be the flood of liberal tears that will follow.
Click to expand...

If Mitch can whip the votes don’t need no stinking Dems.
 
Steal2B

Steal2B

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
26,428
Reaction score
83,222
Location
Dutchess County
livingston said:
Obama Statement on Ginsburg Demands GOP Senate Honors Her Dying ‘Instructions’ and Put Off Vote on Supreme Court Nominee Until New President Sworn In
Former President Barack Obama issued a statement late Friday night on the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The statement was posted to the online site Medium.

In the statement, Obama demanded the Republican controlled Senate not vote on any replacement for Ginsburg until a new president is sworn following the November presidential election. Obama cited his failed 2016 nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to back up his support for Ginsburg’s reported dying “instructions” that her replacement be nominated by a new president (“My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.”)

Four and a half years ago, when Republicans refused to hold a hearing or an up-or-down vote on Merrick Garland, they invented the principle that the Senate shouldn’t fill an open seat on the Supreme Court before a new president was sworn in.

A basic principle of the law — and of everyday fairness — is that we apply rules with consistency, and not based on what’s convenient or advantageous in the moment. The rule of law, the legitimacy of our courts, the fundamental workings of our democracy all depend on that basic principle. As votes are already being cast in this election, Republican Senators are now called to apply that standard. The questions before the Court now and in the coming years — with decisions that will determine whether or not our economy is fair, our society is just, women are treated equally, our planet survives, and our democracy endures — are too consequential to future generations for courts to be filled through anything less than an unimpeachable process.
Click to expand...
ELECTIONS-HAVE-CONSEQUENCES-OBAMA.jpeg 1dvb6z.jpg
 
Defilade

Defilade

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
26,487
Reaction score
38,130
Location
Elsewhere
Cooolone said:
70 days has been the typical vetting before the vote! There's 40 between now and election(?)... So it would be unprecedented to get it done! Add to it the Covid hysteria and limitations... I think it's doubtful!

But that said, it doesn't mean it can't be used... Good or bad, it was a very prominent tool smoldering just under the surface in the 16' election to those of us voters who understood the gravity of the election beyond the surface glimmer and glitz!
Click to expand...
Operation warp speed! Lol
 
Chevusa

Chevusa

.338 Win Mag
Messages
6,718
Reaction score
7,645
Location
Erie
Clearly a lib not taking this well...

BREAKING: Package addressed to the White House containing ricin intercepted by law enforcement. The package was addressed to President Trump. - CNN
 
Robin

Robin

.577 Tyrannosaur.
Messages
20,521
Reaction score
44,459
Location
Livingston County
Will we see black smoke from the Senate chambers for a non vote or will the three RINO's fulfill their constitutional duty and vote, releasing the white smoke of purity signifying a new saint (representing gender non specific) has taken a seat at the right hand of the demigod roberts.
Robin
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top