San Francisco Sen. Scott Wiener Introduces Bill to Decriminalize Men Having Sex With Boys

L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
43,286
Reaction score
118,908
Location
livingston county
San Francisco Sen. Scott Wiener Introduces Bill to Decriminalize Men Having Sex With Boys
San Francisco state Senator Scott Wiener has introduced a new bill to decriminalize adult men having sex with boys and he and his allies in the media are smearing all opposition as "homophobic" and "anti-Semitic."

From The Federalist, "No California Shouldn't Decriminalize Adult Sex With 14-Year-Olds":
LGBT activists have pushed reasonable notions of equality to its limits with obscene perversions. State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco -- the same lawmaker who co-sponsored a bill in 2017 to remove the felony penalty for knowingly exposing another person to HIV -- has introduced a bill, Senate Bill 145 to give judges more flexibility in sentencing gay men who abuse minors.

Under current law -- which Wiener, who is gay, describes as "horrific homophobia" -- a straight 24-year-old male who has sex with a 15-year-old girl can avoid being put on the sex-offender list if the judge feels the situation does not deserve it, but a gay man in the same scenario with a similar-aged boy would not be given the same option.
Click to expand...
www.informationliberation.com

California State Sen. Scott Wiener Introduces Bill to Decriminalize Men Having Sex With Boys

California State Senator Scott Wiener of San Francisco has introduced a new bill to decriminalize adult men having sex with boys and he and his allies in the media are smea
www.informationliberation.com
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
43,286
Reaction score
118,908
Location
livingston county
L6.jpg
 
BDinPutnam

BDinPutnam

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,492
Reaction score
20,850
Location
Someplace else
"Under current law -- which Wiener, who is gay, describes as "horrific homophobia" -- a straight 24-year-old male who has sex with a 15-year-old girl can avoid being put on the sex-offender list if the judge feels the situation does not deserve it, but a gay man in the same scenario with a similar-aged boy would not be given the same option."

On the face of it, both should be treated the same way, no?
 
Mosinitis

Mosinitis

.338 Win Mag
Messages
7,649
Reaction score
6,853
Location
NY state
Pedophilia will be the law of the land in a decade or two. Democrats will push for it. Republicans will do nothing to stop it, so they can point fingers. SCOTUS will side with societal changes. Eventually Jeffrey Epstein will be turned into a martyr. It sounds ridiculous, but so did same sex marriages few decades ago. Now happy same sex couples are a part of every other TV ad. Once cultural standards are rejected, who is there to set the limits.
 
Last edited:
T

Truebeliever

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,402
Reaction score
1,562
Location
Nys
kev74 said:
I agree. I can't think of any good reason 24 year olds should be having sex with 15 year olds, regardless of sex.
Click to expand...
Often it’s a case of the 24 year old not knowing the true age of the “victim”. It’s a strict scrutiny standard of it “doesn’t matter” that they said they were 18, had fake ID, and that they met at an 18 and above event. The guy would still be considered guilty.

Just like some of the “teacher can’t sleep with students “ laws. Some of the “ victims” could be in their 20s and the teacher would still go to jail.
 
GOPerfect

GOPerfect

.700 Nitro Express
LEO / LEA
Messages
28,607
Reaction score
64,094
Location
No longer Secret, thanks DR. Evil
Years ago, on the old forum, a few of us discussed this exact topic. Some predicted this would come sooner than later. Too bad it came sooner than later.

Bad Mojo is coming to America boys and girls.

Too many Americans are lost in their own little worlds to realize how bad things are getting all across the fruited plains...
 
BDinPutnam

BDinPutnam

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,492
Reaction score
20,850
Location
Someplace else
kev74 said:
I agree. I can't think of any good reason 24 year olds should be having sex with 15 year olds, regardless of sex.
Click to expand...

Same, didn't mean to imply otherwise.

I will say though that there are thousands of people who have ended up on the same lists as pedophiles and the like, based on *consensual* sex between say an 18 year old and a 17 year old. I don't know that I like that.
 
Saltwater60

Saltwater60

.950 JDJ
Messages
31,350
Reaction score
35,067
Location
Western NY
GOPerfect said:
Years ago, on the old forum, a few of us discussed this exact topic. Some predicted this would come sooner than later. Too bad it came sooner than later.

Bad Mojo is coming to America boys and girls.

Too many Americans are lost in their own little worlds to realize how bad things are getting all across the fruited plains...
Click to expand...
I was one of them that brought it up there and here. Many said I was nuts. Sad to say told you so on this. I wish I was wrong. I knew demonrats were going for this the way they justified gay Marriage
 
Saltwater60

Saltwater60

.950 JDJ
Messages
31,350
Reaction score
35,067
Location
Western NY
So I read this and it seems it won’t decriminalize it but it will allow the judge to decide on the merit of the case if the perpetrator should go in a sex offender registry or not rather than it being mandatory. Vaginal sex is afforded this scrutiny but oral and anal sex it’s mandatory to be placed on the sex offender registry. This is still a crime it’s just about the registry from what I read.
I don’t have an issue with the way it’s written if I understand it correctly. What needs to change is there needs to be an age gap. If my 18 year old son is dating a 17 year old female and they have sex it should not be a crime.

sd11.senate.ca.gov

Senator Wiener Introduces Legislation to End Discrimination Against LGBT People Regarding Sex Offender Registration

San Francisco – Today, Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) introduced Senate Bill 145 to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry. Currently
sd11.senate.ca.gov sd11.senate.ca.gov
 
spat

spat

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
26,137
Reaction score
54,325
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
BDinPutnam said:
Same, didn't mean to imply otherwise.

I will say though that there are thousands of people who have ended up on the same lists as pedophiles and the like, based on *consensual* sex between say an 18 year old and a 17 year old. I don't know that I like that.
Click to expand...
You get the same thing with DWI standards.

Nobody wants drunks driving around, but then they set the limit so low that one beer with dinner will put someone over, suddenly the "convicted of DWI" thing just doesn't mean "reckless asshole" anymore.

"Convicted felon" used to mean a bad guy you don't want anywhere near guns, but now you don't know if it means "murderer" or "a guy with a full sized magazine"
 
tirwin1

tirwin1

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
12,823
Reaction score
33,393
Location
rochester
BDinPutnam said:
I will say though that there are thousands of people who have ended up on the same lists as pedophiles and the like, based on *consensual* sex between say an 18 year old and a 17 year old. I don't know that I like that.
Click to expand...
I do know. I definitely don't like that. I understand the line has to drawn somewhere but penalizing an 18 year old for the rest of his life seems way too harsh for me.
 
TEOTWAWKI inc.

TEOTWAWKI inc.

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,931
Reaction score
11,683
Location
Tennessee, U.S.A.
BDinPutnam said:
"Under current law -- which Wiener, who is gay, describes as "horrific homophobia" -- a straight 24-year-old male who has sex with a 15-year-old girl can avoid being put on the sex-offender list if the judge feels the situation does not deserve it, but a gay man in the same scenario with a similar-aged boy would not be given the same option."

On the face of it, both should be treated the same way, no?
Click to expand...
You are correct, both are wrong, and should be punishable in the street by the victims father.
 
TEOTWAWKI inc.

TEOTWAWKI inc.

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,931
Reaction score
11,683
Location
Tennessee, U.S.A.
BDinPutnam said:
Same, didn't mean to imply otherwise.

I will say though that there are thousands of people who have ended up on the same lists as pedophiles and the like, based on *consensual* sex between say an 18 year old and a 17 year old. I don't know that I like that.
Click to expand...
I agree with you here as well. My wife and I have been together since we were kids (14 and 15 years old). There was a period of time I could have gotten in trouble just by pissing her parents off.
 
Blimey

Blimey

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
11,252
Reaction score
16,228
Location
Western NY
Imagine actually choosing this to be your hill to die on. Lots of bills he could sponsor, but he's really, really interested in this one.

BTW this is exactly the kind of insane stuff some people on the right thought would happen. At least it seemed insane just a couple years ago. Hard then to believe, but here we are.
 
Blimey

Blimey

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
11,252
Reaction score
16,228
Location
Western NY
BDinPutnam said:
Same, didn't mean to imply otherwise.

I will say though that there are thousands of people who have ended up on the same lists as pedophiles and the like, based on *consensual* sex between say an 18 year old and a 17 year old. I don't know that I like that.
Click to expand...
Well that's absurd and we all know it. Two 17 year olds it's fine but if one hits 18 first then it's statuatory rape. That's silly.

I think the author's view is that the original finding was bullshit, so he does not want more bullshit piled on. Objectively, forgetting the 24 year old guy and 15 year old girl, the author does not support added protections for an adult screwing a boy.
 
BDinPutnam

BDinPutnam

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,492
Reaction score
20,850
Location
Someplace else
Blimey said:
Well that's absurd and we all know it. Two 17 year olds it's fine but if one hits 18 first then it's statuatory rape. That's silly.

I think the author's view is that the original finding was bullshit, so he does not want more bullshit piled on. Objectively, forgetting the 24 year old guy and 15 year old girl, the author does not support added protections for an adult screwing a boy.
Click to expand...

But he's good with an adult screwing an underage girl?
 
Darth

Darth

Bunny In Chief
Messages
19,031
Reaction score
23,679
Location
MoCo
Mosinitis said:
It sounds ridiculous, but so did same sex marriages few decades ago. Now happy same sex couples are a part of every other TV ad.
Click to expand...
Oh the humanity.

And of course the problem with same sex couples is...?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top