Leaving the tube would allow easy unloading, not chambering and the unchambering each round.
In all likelihood it was probably a matter of economy that the tube loading system was retained, they can keep using the same tubes and not have parallel tube production.Leaving the tube would allow easy unloading, not chambering and the unchambering each round.
I work a lot with brass in the guns I make, which is a cartridge type formula. It has a tendency to become work hardened and brittle. If it is a butter soft brass with a lot of zinc its just a matter of time before it becomes loose as a goose. Now I'm talking center fire ammo here, not .22. If they are using a 'naval brass' formula, which is in the bronze family with tin in it you might be alright for years and years.Whats the issue with a hardened brass receiver? Henry has been making brass receiver rifles for well over 100 yrs.
Point taken. Most of their centerfire rifles are made of steel , with brass being an option, I believe. Their .22 golden Boy rifles are not actually brass. Rather, it’s an added gold tone to the metal.I work a lot with brass in the guns I make, which is a cartridge type formula. It has a tendency to become work hardened and brittle. If it is a butter soft brass with a lot of zinc its just a matter of time before it becomes loose as a goose. Now I'm talking center fire ammo here, not .22. If they are using a 'naval brass' formula, which is in the bronze family with tin in it you might be alright for years and years.
If I come to the point where I am want one of those guns and their brass receiver is the only offering I will communicate my apprehensions with them and here what they have to say. Thats just me, I have heard of no long term problems with their brass receivers, but I haven't looked into it either.
Robin