BR3ND0
9mm
Why defend a gun that fails in ways that other guns don't? Because you bought it? That's pretty stupid.
Trust me. Im not defending something I bought. Im more praising it, lol
I was hoping my post would start I fire. It was very fan boyish and Defensive. But I was really looking forward to all the Rebuttals and the Replies.
I do like the criticism,
But to reply to you and others, if this sounds like a angry rebuttal it is not. Just answering with info from what I have seen.
The Steyr Patent thing. I did look into i have three gun news pages and two forums that I follow religiously and read, but from what I gather off it. It was like its stated. They basically tried to patent the idea of Modular type trigger unit. Then never really had a design. Or did they have said prototype. Because the Beretta APX is Modular. Why weren't they sue’d
Because they aren’t as popular or have a 580 million contract??? Also the case is still dead really. Again not defending but patent cases can be in play due to the littlest detail or idea that may have been infringed upon. Idk but yeah.
They are accused of stealing or infringing on a patent, are they guilty of it? I cant say because i never seen a true design or prototype of their Modular Idea.
When i stated innovation. Yes i still think Sig has fueled new ideas and methods into striker fired weapons and compact ones. I like the triggers. I like what they came up with the grip frames. Are they plain jane and feel light. But if you mess up your own stipple, Paint it wrong, Dog eats it. 40 bucks gets you a new one!!!!
I do feel their motto “complete weapons systems provider” is too much. Yes its great they wanna make rifles, ammo, scopes, pistols, etc. but building and inspecting all these thing has taken a huge toll on QUALITY CONTROL of the pistol line
In short site, Is the gun i like. Which i bought a lot got and of........perfect ...NO
But in 4-5 years the have had rolling updates to the frames, slide stop, take down lever, Night sites. Trigger was more forced to recall
So they do re-act to customers input and criticism fast. They changed or upgraded it quick. Is what i was trying to point out.
That they made rolling changes in 5 years,
Where as Glock as tried to play it safe with same design and internals for 30 yrs
But people will say, yeah. Why mess with perfection. Or it works why modify it. I do agree
I just don't know why certain companies get criticized for trying to make a better firearm.
Look at Springfield armory. They didnt make a striker fire gun. The flat out bought and purchased the XD line of that Croatian company. Not innovative really. But those guns ate nice. Shoot well. Still use Springfield tooling for the barrels and triggers. I hear people say all the time. “ im not biying that foreign crap” or they knock the gun. Did they all forget Glocks are Austrian. Croatia is right next door. Practically same people made a diff style gun, plus theyvare also good weapons with one minor recall. Who cares that they are re branded.
Back to the point, I did wanna infuse a topic in this thread. Sorry if i annoyed anyone. I do love myself the conversations tho.