Only because our Republican party makes back door deals to protect their little Long Island paradise.Well she is going to lose. NYC has too many liberal voters to overcome.
The Republican Party at the State level in NY is pretty much irrelevant.
I dare say many feel the same way, but it should be noted that we have had Republican Governors and Zelden only lost be a precious few points...People in general have had more than enough of Hochul, there's always a chance and you can't win if you don't play.Well she is going to lose. NYC has too many liberal voters to overcome.
The Republican Party at the State level in NY is pretty much irrelevant.
I also enjoyed her putting it to Hochul in that hearing.It’s a lost cause but I’ll vote for her. I enjoyed watching her rip Hochul apart.
Makes one wonder why we bother with anything; Gun Groups, Political Action Committees, Election Campaigns, the whole fucking gamut...all we do is bitch about loosing a battle we haven't fought.Even if she gets elected she’ll never accomplish anything with the house and the senate against her.
NY is a lost cause…there is no hope of fixing it.
That’s a good question, because the people you mentioned never really get anything accomplished. And even when they try to, NY courts and law makers just ignore it.Makes one wonder why we bother with anything; Gun Groups, Political Action Committees, Election Campaigns, the whole fucking gamut...all we do is bitch about loosing a battle we haven't fought.
If there's "no hope" then why even bother?
Patacki wasn’t a real republican. I was 14 when he was elected and knew that.Both Pataki and Giuliani won office in the midterms of '94. That was during Slick Willie's first term as POTUS and the Republican's "Contractonwith America" marketing strategy. Limbaugh was as popular as ever. Republicans had some momentum. Also, it didn't hurt that NYC crime rates were high (as now) during Koch and Dinkins admins and that Mario Cuomo was at the end his term limit for Governor. I also think the party-line affiliations were a bit jumbled after the 3-way POTUS race of '92 - Clinton won a plurality of the popular vote, not the majority.
That said, the possibility of a Stefanik win this next midterm may hinge on a mix of Republican turnout, Independent's votes and Democrat apathy. To a large extent that will all ride on the coattails of Trump's success.
At this point I'd say there is a good chance she could win, better than any point since '94. There are parallels in terms of crime rates and shifts in party preferences. She may be our best chance. Decent name recognition, I have no doubt she will out-debate AssHochul and any gender association issue is somewhat neutralized.
One difference between now and '94 is that we didn't have the same reach of internet for those who claim to be on the Right to spread their own defeatist, apathetic, self-fulfilling prophecies of doom.
Oh yeah, I'll swing at the ball but we're going to lose anyway, is what most are saying.
Carry on. Act like losers and then blame the winners for it. The problem with this State isn't the Liberals...they are a problem whole country over...it's those who claim to be on the Right in which retreat is a viable strategy and winning is just a dream.