GlockModel29
.40 S&W
Yes, the deadline was 4pm today.Was t comments by the state due today? Or did they just not bother and that’s ok too?
Yes, the deadline was 4pm today.Was t comments by the state due today? Or did they just not bother and that’s ok too?
Did we really expect anything else?What a bunch-of criminals
"this Court’s premature intervention is neither appropriate nor necessary".
Loaded with bullshit.So the state responded…..and it’s bullshit.
I didn’t. Many others thought the outcome would be favorable, but I’m not sure why? We have had zero positive outcomes for more than a few minutes and even those decisions never went into effect. Yes the CCIA is unconstitutional and a judge in NYS a said it but this judge is a lower court so it doesn’t really help up much.Did we really expect anything else?
Let's face it, this is NY. It will always be against the law to legally CCW.
if you can't win with facts baffle them with bullshit .Loaded with bullshit.
Thats not a decision from SCOTUS, its just the states response. Let's wait to see what SCOTUS has to say.I didn’t. Many others thought the outcome would be favorable, but I’m not sure why? We have had zero positive outcomes for more than a few minutes and even those decisions never went into effect. Yes the CCIA is unconstitutional and a judge in NYS a said it but this judge is a lower court so it doesn’t really help up much.
I suspect of the second circuit ever gets around to it we will get guns at churches back for good, and guns at a few locations like parks and other low populated outdoor spaces and that’s it. Maybe at private businesses but I don’t expect that honestly.
So the state responded…..and it’s bullshit.
It could be written in feces and the judge will still side with the state.is that written in crayons ?? i don't have a pdf reader with Crayola capabilities LOL .
Yes I’m aware of that. I expect nothing good to come out of it. Standing has plagued this case and that dirty little word is in the states response and I’m sure for good reason on their part.Thats not a decision from SCOTUS, its just the states response. Let's wait to see what SCOTUS has to say.
I agree.There's a decent chance that actually could happen....on a future episode of "The Twilight Zone".....
I can't believe the state believes that shitSome good summary here for those that don't want to read it all:
They don’t but they will say whatever they have to to further the agenda.I can't believe the state believes that shit
They don’t but they have to say something that someone will believeI can't believe the state believes that shit
That guy is mistaken. He's reading the states response and incorrectly labeling it as the 2nd Circuit response.....
Other than that, it sounds like he was fairly spot onThat guy is mistaken. He's reading the states response and incorrectly labeling it as the 2nd Circuit response.....
Yeah i caught that too. Just wanted to post it anyway so people could see it.That guy is mistaken. He's reading the states response and incorrectly labeling it as the 2nd Circuit response.....
Yeah i caught that too. Just wanted to post it anyway so people could see it.
The vast majority of new vehicles don't even have a frame.serious question:
if you know anything about cars/trucks. Can you or the .gov please explain how anyone could bolt a gun safe to the FRAME of any vehicle?
I bolted mine to the floor of the truck, but there is no physical way to bolt a safe to the frame
I keep a pistol in our jeep 24/7.As far as the fire proof and fire resistant debate goes....u guys wanna split hairs...its all good...I stand corrected....im 100% positive over the summer I read that the lock box had to be bolted to the frame....it appears that is not the case.
It's like the prisoners in the concentration camps that are about to be liberated.Prob speaking for myself here, but I feel a lot less "Free" after 'winning" Bruen.
I keep a pistol in our jeep 24/7.
It's in a $40 lock box from tractor supply secured with a 3/16" steel cable to the seat frame.
It would easily meet the legal requirements outlined there.
They are a ridiculous violation of our rights, but they are not difficult to meet.
Similar to this one.
LOL, when you file taxes, claim income from your wife paying you to guard her.Guys, remember that most of this CCIA nonsense is temporary. It will get struck down. It might take another year. It’s like other civil rights movements. It can take time and some set backs .
In the meantime, use the loopholes given. I tend to be well reversed in these laws compared to most LE and this new law can be confusing as to when and what is legal for certain people .
What is on duty security officer ? And his area of employment? When are they on duty?
Get an armed security guard license because the above questions can be different for different security jobs. How is that cop to know?
Give that cop a reason to explain why he didn’t enforce that sensitive or restricted area stuff. Don’t believe that the security guard license could save you?
I remember a news story of photographer who got caught carrying a gun when he was there to do the student photos. He didn’t get arrested because he had a work contract with the school( the law has changed since then) . The police were confused if the law applied to him or not.
A armed security guard license is a pain to get but it might be worth it.
I've used both.I have accouple similar that I keep in my vehicles if I need to lock my handgun away. I also use them when I am flying. Mine are combination not key though.