A person would have to be willfully lying or disconnected from reality to think he did "great".Jill and the VP said he did great.
Doesn't Kamala think that dudes in dresses are women? Yeah, disconnected from reality.
A person would have to be willfully lying or disconnected from reality to think he did "great".Jill and the VP said he did great.
I’m a Christian but I do believe in the separation between church and state. The government should be for everyone not just Christians, Muslims, or Palestinians. One thing’s for sure the left would never allow Christian teaching in schools and yes I know Palestinians aren’t a religion but you can argue the left is making them one.Now have a teacher do the same thing with a guy dressed as Moses reading the 10 commandments and watch the Libs heads explode.
He can’t handle a walk around the block.Well after this debate it's very clear to All that Biden cannot handle the rigors of the job. He needs to be in a retirement home
He did do great according to them but remember they k ow how far gone he is. They know what he’s about. They know it’s over.Jill and the VP said he did great.
I agree with separation of church and state.I’m a Christian but I do believe in the separation between church and state. The government should be for everyone not just Christians, Muslims, or Palestinians. One thing’s for sure the left would never allow Christian teaching in schools and yes I know Palestinians aren’t a religion but you can argue the left is making them one.
Absolutely. Most if not all moral codes have a basis in religion. So it's difficult to separate the two. But not impossible. You don't have to believe in God to recognize the wisdom in the last 7 of the 10 commandments.I agree with separation of church and state.
In fact, I think the 1A forbids government from even deciding what is and isn't religion. That precludes forbidding something on the basis that it's religious.
You can forbid teaching fiction as fact, and define fiction as things that aren't supported by evidence. That would cover a lot of religious topics.
But, the 10 commandments are the foundation for many modern legal frameworks, so even absent any religious reasons, teaching them is certainly an appropriate topic.
You don't have to believe they came from God to believe that they have a massive historical significance.
Freedom of …not freedom from.The separation of church and state was to prevent an official religion backed by the state and prevent the state from telling people how/who they could worship. I feel this has been lost and twisted significantly from what it was originally intended to protect, predictably the left has ruined this and its taken on something that it wasn't meant to be. They have tried with their double speak to change the defacto state of what this implies.
Then the same could be said about most religions and being historically significant. Our entire timeframe of seven day weeks, and our years are based on the Bible. Also the Bible is as accurate as any historical context from that timeframe on a purely written recorded text since many of the places and event have been confirmed outside the Bible and from other recordings throughout history.I agree with separation of church and state.
In fact, I think the 1A forbids government from even deciding what is and isn't religion. That precludes forbidding something on the basis that it's religious.
You can forbid teaching fiction as fact, and define fiction as things that aren't supported by evidence. That would cover a lot of religious topics.
But, the 10 commandments are the foundation for many modern legal frameworks, so even absent any religious reasons, teaching them is certainly an appropriate topic.
You don't have to believe they came from God to believe that they have a massive historical significance.
This I agree with 100%.The separation of church and state was to prevent an official religion backed by the state and prevent the state from telling people how/who they could worship. I feel this has been lost and twisted significantly from what it was originally intended to protect, predictably the left has ruined this and its taken on something that it wasn't meant to be. They have tried with their double speak to change the defacto state of what this implies.
True. I always say if we could all just obey the Ten Commandments the world would be a much better place.Absolutely. Most if not all moral codes have a basis in religion. So it's difficult to separate the two. But not impossible. You don't have to believe in God to recognize the wisdom in the last 7 of the 10 commandments.
Then the same could be said about most religions and being historically significant. Our entire timeframe of seven day weeks, and our years are based on the Bible. Also the Bible is as accurate as any historical context from that timeframe on a purely written recorded text since many of the places and event have been confirmed outside the Bible and from other recordings throughout history.
It’s all an interesting topic but can become a rabbit hole. As said I’m religious but I do not shove it down anyone’s throat or force it on anyone. I will at times bring it up casually in conversation like I did here and if someone is interested and asks me more questions a then that’s great. If not that’s fine too. I met two very nice lesbians yesterday with my wife and thought it might make them uncomfortable so I did t bring it up. They don’t push their lifestyle on me so I thought it wise to not push mine on them. Maybe I’m a bad Christian for that but I want to respect people too.
5-10...Absolutely. Most if not all moral codes have a basis in religion. So it's difficult to separate the two. But not impossible. You don't have to believe in God to recognize the wisdom in the last 7 of the 10 commandments.
Fair enough.5-10...
At this late stage they need names people recognize.
Obanga and hitlery fit the bill, plus you get the homosexual vote, the female vote, and it would be the first ever ticket vote; demonrats and fools would slurp that right up.
Yup.Not really.... Our use of the seven-day week can be traced back to the astronomically gifted Babylonians and the decree of King Sargon I of Akkad around 2300 BCE.
I keep seeing people saying this. So, she is as big a liar as any of them, but this statement we believe? I dont believe it for a second. She will run and probably has the best shot at beating Trump of any of them. Any votes Brandon actually got were because of his close association to Obuma. A lot of us assume that Obuma was behind the curtain pulling the strings, every libtard in America was happy as could be that he was. I can see it now, "I dont want to run, I dont want to be POTUS, but I have to do it to save us from Trump". Barrak dont have to be behind the curtain if she gets elected.Except the Obama trainwreck "doesn't want to run".
So back up to the Newsome vs DeSantis debate and ask yourself as I did, why would the RNC allow this? I know DeSantis needed a boost in the polls but debating a Democrat? Not the wisest of choices. The answer for me then and confirmed after the Trump debate was the DNC was floating a replacement for Biden. Introducing him the national voting block. Now Newsome didn't do well but that doesn't disqualify him as their guy. The media will help anyone the DNC picks and we see how the media will control the political narrative going forward in not allowing anyone to rebroadcast, use clips or possibly reference any debates or interview of video footage in the next 4 months. Elon at X basically said to them FU. lolWho could replace Fuck Joe Biden? Nine potential Assholes.
1. Governor Gavin Newsome - CA
2. VP Kamala Harris
3. Michael Obama
4. Governor Gretchen Whitmer - MI
5. Killery Clinton
6. Governor JB Pritzker - IL
7. Governor Josh Shapiro - PA
8. Sen Raphael Warnock - GA
9. Rep Dean Phillips - MN
Who could replace Joe Biden? Nine potential candidates
Newsweek has summarized nine potential Democratic presidential candidates who could replace Joe Biden if he stands aside after Thursday's debate.www.newsweek.com
Or maybe Fuck Joe Biden doesn't get replaced at all.
Ever notice how the left screws everything up that they are involved in?
The Democrat Party should be rebranded as the Disaster Party.
Top three on this list won’t happen. They know kamal is too stupid. New some has wrecked California faster than anyone could imagine and Michelle Obama has been vacant. Hilary has come back from the dead but I don’t think she’s a winner.Who could replace Fuck Joe Biden? Nine potential Assholes.
1. Governor Gavin Newsome - CA
2. VP Kamala Harris
3. Michael Obama
4. Governor Gretchen Whitmer - MI
5. Killery Clinton
6. Governor JB Pritzker - IL
7. Governor Josh Shapiro - PA
8. Sen Raphael Warnock - GA
9. Rep Dean Phillips - MN
Who could replace Joe Biden? Nine potential candidates
Newsweek has summarized nine potential Democratic presidential candidates who could replace Joe Biden if he stands aside after Thursday's debate.www.newsweek.com
Or maybe Fuck Joe Biden doesn't get replaced at all.
Ever notice how the left screws everything up that they are involved in?
The Democrat Party should be rebranded as the Disaster Party.
Whitner is my guess.If, and it is a BIG IF, the ticket changes, you can bet your last can of Alpo the chosen one will be from a state crucial to the race!
Whitmer has COVID baggage. Won't matter to "progressives", but everyone else?