Of course!You think anything would be different if they launched such an attack from Ukraine instead of Poland or Germany ?
The notion that Russia needs or could make any use whatsoever of a buffer zone like that is just silly.
Russia demanding a buffer zone against NATO is like Danny Devito demanding a 5 yard head start in a 100 yard dash against Usain Bolt.Of course!
LOL, Come on, the concept is called time and distance, the principle doesn't change. See Napoleon, German invasion of Russia
It might not make a difference but it certainly is in their thinking. The Warsaw pact was a deliberate set of buffer nations designed to be the first line of defense against future invasion from the west. I can see how the Russians would want to replicate something similar in today's environment.Russia demanding a buffer zone against NATO is like Danny Devito demanding a 5 yard head start in a 100 yard dash against Usain Bolt.
It doesn’t make any difference.
Easier said then done. There is a reason why the Warsaw Pact fell apart and a reason why none of the eastern European countries want to replicate it.It might not make a difference but it certainly is in their thinking. The Warsaw pact was a deliberate set of buffer nations designed to be the first line of defense against future invasion from the west. I can see how the Russians would want to replicate something similar in today's environment.
Sorry it .makes a huge difference. Kinda shocked ed you would even say thatRussia demanding a buffer zone against NATO is like Danny Devito demanding a 5 yard head start in a 100 yard dash against Usain Bolt.
It doesn’t make any difference.
Ok, explain what difference it would make in the real world.Sorry it .makes a huge difference. Kinda shocked ed you would even say that
I'm not sure what you think you know, but it certainly doesn't seem accurate.No, and Im not going to try to explain military principles which are not subject to change, strategy, tactics, logistics to you .
Your not well read on the subject and it would take hours, days, of my time to explain , which You wouldn't agree with anyway.
I prefer to just disagree .
I'm not sure what you think you know, but it certainly doesn't seem accurate.
Such as?
I'm not sure what you think you know, but it certainly doesn't seem accurate.
I seriously doubt some in depth analysis of a conflict between Russia and NATO in 2023 is going to find some golden bullet that will allow Russia to meaningfully alter the outcome just because they get a few hundred miles more buffer.
Strategy and Tactics are pretty well understood at this point (except by Russia who keeps trying century old tactics against a modern enemy and wondering why they fail).
Assuming you don't make any absurd blunders like that, logistics is the main challenge. The logistical ability of NATO so outclasses Russia that it's ridiculous to even compare them.
Russian logistics failed miserably only a few hours drive from their border.
There is also the small matter of the scale of the militaries.
NATO defense spending is about 1.2 Trillion dollars in 2022. The entire GDP of Russia is only 1.7T
NATO GDP is 46T by the way. That's an order of magnitude greater. Canada alone has a larger GDP than Russia.
NATO has about 3.3 million active troops vs Russia's 1.15M
You can try and pretend the quality of the Russian troops is on par with NATO, it it would be a fantasy.
The fact that Russia has so utterly failed to take Ukraine, a country that has little defensive capability at all compared to NATO should make this clear.
I'm not sure what you think you know, but it certainly doesn't seem accurate.
I seriously doubt some in depth analysis of a conflict between Russia and NATO in 2023 is going to find some golden bullet that will allow Russia to meaningfully alter the outcome just because they get a few hundred miles more buffer.
Strategy and Tactics are pretty well understood at this point (except by Russia who keeps trying century old tactics against a modern enemy and wondering why they fail).
Assuming you don't make any absurd blunders like that, logistics is the main challenge. The logistical ability of NATO so outclasses Russia that it's ridiculous to even compare them.
Russian logistics failed miserably only a few hours drive from their border.
There is also the small matter of the scale of the militaries.
NATO defense spending is about 1.2 Trillion dollars in 2022. The entire GDP of Russia is only 1.7T
NATO GDP is 46T by the way. That's an order of magnitude greater. Canada alone has a larger GDP than Russia.
NATO has about 3.3 million active troops vs Russia's 1.15M
You can try and pretend the quality of the Russian troops is on par with NATO, it it would be a fantasy.
The fact that Russia has so utterly failed to take Ukraine, a country that has little defensive capability at all compared to NATO should make this clear.
It didn't make any sense for them to invade Ukraine either. I didn't think they were stupid enough to do it right up until they crossed the border.If everything you said is true, why do you believe Russia is going to invade Europe? You dont make any sense.
What that I said was inaccurate?You forgot a whole lot of stuff. a lot of what you said is wildly inaccurate.
Makes me wonder how they determined that. Other than outright lying like they usually do.The gin up for war brought to you by heels up harris.
![]()
US determines Russia has committed crimes against humanity in Ukraine, VP Harris says
Vice President Kamala Harris spoke at the Munich Security Conference in Germany on Saturday, where she said Russian atrocities in Ukraine must be addressed.www.foxnews.com
Be the first one on your block to have your kid come home in a box.
Sure it has. Where else is there a puppet US-backed .gov specifically set up to assist in their money laundering and germ production businesses?Ukraine has never been a vital U.S. interest.
Real good flick!! It depicts the arrogant, obstinance of the aristocratic leaders to seek peace while continuing to send 100k’s of their young men to slaughter.I saw an interview with Stephen Kotkin from Princeton. He said the US is trying to fight a war of attrition with Russia with both hands tied behind our back.
We are not ramping up weapons production here to offset the rate of use by the Ukrainians. And the sanctions don't seem to have affected the ability of the Russians to replenish their stocks.
Makes me wonder exactly what is the end game here for the US. This seems a little like world war one where the belligerents saw no other option than to just keep the war going.