Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
how long will this war last ..
it will last as long as the war machine is raking in $$$$$$
it will last as long as the war machine is raking in $$$$$$
My theroy is that a Russia must build an army that can fight NATO if they are attacked. They fully expect NATO to jump in and save the day at some point . They need to have an army trained and ready in the event that happens what they dont want to do is provoke NATO into an attack by being weak . they have to hold back , buy time and prepare , whether it happens or not. They want to deter NATO from entering the conflict at all costs, that means not loseing all your men in a victory . Russia must have over 1 million , probably 2 million men under arms for a deterrent . They are working on achieving that now . 350,000 Russians in Ukraine fighting now. they have 350,000 in reserve and conscripting more ,
Close, but they actually DGAF who controls Ukraine, or how many people die.I'm pretty convinced the West and nato doesn't actually really want Ukraine to win. NATO thinks winning is turning this into a 3 to 5 year war with a million plus casualties.
They want to give Ukraine enough to keep going but not enough to get themselves directly in a war with Russia
They want to use the Ukrainians as cannon fodder to wear down and weaken the Russians and drag this out as long as possible and deplete Russia of men and equipment.
War PigsRussian Defense Minister: NATO assembled 360,000 troops in Eastern Europe. Poland is preparing to occupy Western Ukraine. Important: If NATO moves from a proxy war setting into a direct war with Russia it will be WW3 with all the devastating consequences.
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu declared that NATO is now a major direct threat to Russia with its deployment to Ukraine and to the borders of the Russian Federation: “With the armed forces of NATO in Eastern European countries, about 360,000 troops, 8,000 armored vehicles, 6,000 artillery systems and mortars, 600 warplanes and helicopters, which are deployed on the borders of the Federal State (Russia and Belarus),” he stated that this is a direct threat to Russia!
Latvia moves troops to the Belarusian border Columns of military equipment were seen in the city of Ludza. Eyewitnesses report that weapons are moving east. Earlier, the Polish authorities announced similar measures. Lithuania also strengthened its borders.
Latvia to ask thousands of Russian citizens to leave the country
Up to 6,000 of Russian citizens in Latvia are expected to receive official notices next month asking them to leave the country, according to Ingmārs Līdaka, head of the parliament’s Commission on Citizenship, Migration and Public Mobilisation.
Latvia to ask thousands of Russian citizens to leave the country
Up to 6,000 of Russian citizens in Latvia are expected to receive official notices next month asking them to leave the c...www.lrt.lt
Russian Defense Minister: NATO assembled 360,000 troops in Eastern Europe. Poland is preparing to occupy Western Ukraine. Important: If NATO moves from a proxy war setting into a direct war with Russia it will be WW3 with all the devastating consequences.
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu declared that NATO is now a major direct threat to Russia with its deployment to Ukraine and to the borders of the Russian Federation: “With the armed forces of NATO in Eastern European countries, about 360,000 troops, 8,000 armored vehicles, 6,000 artillery systems and mortars, 600 warplanes and helicopters, which are deployed on the borders of the Federal State (Russia and Belarus),” he stated that this is a direct threat to Russia!
Latvia moves troops to the Belarusian border Columns of military equipment were seen in the city of Ludza. Eyewitnesses report that weapons are moving east. Earlier, the Polish authorities announced similar measures. Lithuania also strengthened its borders.
Latvia to ask thousands of Russian citizens to leave the country
Up to 6,000 of Russian citizens in Latvia are expected to receive official notices next month asking them to leave the country, according to Ingmārs Līdaka, head of the parliament’s Commission on Citizenship, Migration and Public Mobilisation.
Latvia to ask thousands of Russian citizens to leave the country
Up to 6,000 of Russian citizens in Latvia are expected to receive official notices next month asking them to leave the c...www.lrt.lt
Yeah, the Russian dictator isn't acting like a nazi, like at all.
Robin
Well, there is only one leader here violently pursuing a policy that looks suspiciously like Lebensraum...The pool of simpletons who believe that is getting smaller and smaller.
Well, there is only one leader here violently pursuing a policy that looks suspiciously like Lebensraum...
How do you make that comparison?Well, there is only one leader here violently pursuing a policy that looks suspiciously like Lebensraum...
Violently invading your neighbor to acquire their territory.How do you make that comparison?
thats it? thats your standard?Violently invading your neighbor to acquire their territory.
Lebensraum was literally the policy that Germany had a right to invade some lands because they were really German all along. It's the exact same rhetoric I've seen you using to defend Putin.Hitler wanted to control Europe. U.S. wants to control the entire world and it's drilled into American psyche that this is how it supposed to be.
Lebensraum was literally the policy that Germany had a right to invade some lands because they were really German all along. It's the exact same rhetoric I've seen you using to defend Putin.
Violently invading your neighbor to acquire their territory.
Lebensraum was literally the policy that Germany had a right to invade some lands because they were really German all along. It's the exact same rhetoric I've seen you using to defend Putin.
That depends entirely on why you invade. But in the very least it's a much lesser degree of bad.So its OK to Violently invade if you dont keep the territory?
So in the case of national security, it might be Ok?That depends entirely on why you invade. But in the very least it's a much lesser degree of bad.
Sort of like breaking into someone's house is bad, but not all reasons are the same.
Except as usual the rhetoric and the actual reasons are not remotely related.If Hitler only invaded areas which were German pre-WWI and didn't practice Arian supremacy, he would actually get away with it and he wouldn't go down in history as a villain.
"National Security" is a very broad brush that is used to justify a lot of really bad behavior.So in the case of national security, it might be Ok?
That is true, However, Russia recognized this possible threat 30 years ago and during the break up of the soviet union and It was made clear to Ukraine and to the world numerous times That Ukraine joining NATO would be an unacceptable threat to Russia and would mean war. It was contingent upon release from the soviet union that Ukraine remain neutral. It was written into their constitution. Ukraine had adhered to its agreement with Russia until the 2014 overthrow of the government. All of which are historical facts ."National Security" is a very broad brush that is used to justify a lot of really bad behavior.
Ukraine alone never posed a threat to Russia. NATO did. NATO offered Ukraine a membership knowing full well it was a red line to war for the Russians , they did it anyways . they wanted the war , they armed the Ukraine. Russia wasnt even prepared for a war as was evidenced by the piss poor planning and training , lack of manpower to do the job, they had less forces than Ukraine at the start of the war. ' They tried to end the fighting in the donbass with the Minsk accords . the ones angela merkle said :Are you suggesting that Ukraine posed any sort of real threat to Russian national security ?
Or just that Putin’s paranoia despite all logic somehow justified this ?