SAMs.How would they enforce it with no air force? That doesn't make a lot of sense
It'll be a decade or more before we can get an honest approximation.I don't expect honest reporting from either side. Has anyone come across loss statistics that seem reasonable at all?
Yep, nobody can afford to risk aircraft over the front lines. So nobody gets close air support.Do the Ukrainian airforce fly over Ukraine? theres a massive assault on Robatyne , wheres the aircover?
meanwhile zelensky been crying about F 16's
Ukraine still has solid control of the entire west of the country. They can safely fly out of anything west of Kiev. They don't need to base out of country.No one knows.
Every side is pumping out propaganda to further their narrative.
Ukraine claims they've killed xxx,xxx Russians and only lost xx,xxx Ukrainians.
Russia claims they've killed xxx,xxxx Ukrainians and only lost xx,xxx Russians.
I really don't think either side is honestly reporting loses. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
I do know that one side has forbidden their citizens from leaving the country and are forcibly kidnapping/conscripting them. One sides average age of soldiers is now something absurd like avg. Age of 45 years old so what does that say?
Russia has lost a lot of planes. But they still have planes to fly. Many of their losses were su22 frog foots. The splashy headlines of su-34s maybe around 8-10 have been lost total. Their command and control AWACS and IL76 loses hurt more than a few SU22s
When Ukraine is desperate enough to fly their planes they are essentially on a suicide mission. That's why I'm pretty convinced they are going to pull some shenanigans to base their F16s out of Poland or something.
thats not an air force. We were talking aircraft .SAMs.
Any air base in western Ukraine can be hit with Missiles and have been. Yes they would definitely have to base outside of Ukraine , the landing strips would be pummeled .Ukraine still has solid control of the entire west of the country. They can safely fly out of anything west of Kiev. They don't need to base out of country.
Yep, nobody can afford to risk aircraft over the front lines. So nobody gets close air support.
I.e. it's a no fly zone.
Curious, how many?
No, we were talking a no fly zone.thats not an air force. We were talking aircraft .
No. Thats not what I was talking about. Its pretty obvious that sams were in play.No, we were talking a no fly zone.
If your opponent can't fly aircraft, it's a no fly zone.
Whether your using your own aircraft, SAMs, or Jewish space lasers to deny them access to the air, it's still a no fly zone.
Some stray attacks, sure.Any air base in western Ukraine can be hit with Missiles and have been. Yes they would definitely have to base outside of Ukraine , the landing strips would be pummeled .
We were talking about Ukraine setting up their own no fly zone.No. Thats not what I was talking about. Its pretty obvious that sams were in play.
One of us is.Your wrong on so many levels ,
That leaves you.One of us is.
""2- NATO will establish a no fly zone over western Ukraine to protect the f16 infrastructure in western Ukraine.""My prediction,
Ukraine won't have the infrastructure to support the f16s so 1 of 2 outcomes will happen.
1- Ukraine will fly and operate the f16s from actual NATO airfields in Poland.
2- NATO will establish a no fly zone over western Ukraine to protect the f16 infrastructure in western Ukraine.
Either plan is very likely going to (deliberately) get NATO pulled into the conflict. Russia won't just sit there and say sure Ukraine use your donated F16s to launch donated cruise missiles at Russian airbases, navy ships and Moscow no problem. No. Russia will have no choice but to attack the F16s on the ground regardless where they are located.
Ukraine still has solid control of the entire west of the country. They can safely fly out of anything west of Kiev. They don't need to base out of country.
Doubt Poland would allow that.Yes, and no. It's a giant complicated mess
They can still be hit by missiles at will.y thinking was not many of Ukraines airfields are in good enough shape to support F16s and they can be tracked by s-400s pretty much upon take off
I was theorizing that Ukraine would launch F16s from Poland fly briefly into Ukraine and launch long range cruise missiles or beyond visual range air to air missiles then turn around and run back into polish/NATO air space
Man, you're all over the place. Your response has nothing do with the question asked.How many what? sorties or defense missiles? Ukrainians reported 50 to 100 strikes a day over Advika. Those fabs are heavy, 1000-3000 pound bombs Bunker busters . Not sure about how many Missiles, Ukraine is complaining they need more , low stock right now .
Man, you're all over the place. Your response has nothing do with the question asked.
Of course it's vague, because it wasn't directed at youOk fair enough make your question clear . It was pretty vague.
The only thing of value on the base is the aircraft. Everything else is disposable.
But that's all the ukranian airbase needs to be, a runway, a tent, a fuel bladder and a truck full of ammo.
Well then ,that would make a lot more sense.Of course it's vague, because it wasn't directed at you
Sure, Russia can maybe lob some missiles that way, but their track record says they're going to run out of missiles before they cause enough damage to matter.
LoL, we're talking about an expedient airbase in a forward area. Not some major permanent base.This demostrates what you know about the air force. Everything is a necessity. Its lean. You hit the ammo dump there is no weapons, you hit the fuel storage there is no fuel, you hit the hangers theres no aircraft. You hit the barracks theres no pilots, mechanics .
what about cooks? what about trucks? what about officers? radar ? coms ? mechanics? pilots ? what about the maintenance needed ? what about the heavy equipment ? Lol , its not a video game .
158 missiles and they only managed to kill 39 people.Its almost as if your watching a different war, some place else.
Russia has enough missiles to again hammer Ukraine with massive barrages, but it looks to be going after different targets
Jan2 2024
Over the past few days, Russia has launched massive long-range strikes against Ukraine, targeting both civilian and military infrastructure. Last Friday's attack has been described by Ukrainian officials as the worst aerial strike of the war, involving 158 missiles and drones and a death toll of at least 39 people.
On Tuesday, Russia followed that attack with more than 130 missiles, 10 of which were Kinzhal missiles, and drones. Ukraine said it was able to shoot down the majority of the incoming threats, including all of the Kinzhals, using Western-provided air defenses such as the US-made Patriot.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Tuesday that since last Friday, the Russians have lobbed about 500 missiles and drones at his country.
"For Russia, the supply of strike munitions is increasing. In October 2022 Russia was producing approximately 40 long-range missiles a month. Now it is producing over 100 a month, and this is supplemented by large numbers of Geran-2 UAVs," Jack Watling, a land warfare expert at the Royal United Services Institute, wrote in an October report.
Russia has enough missiles to again hammer Ukraine with massive barrages, but it looks to be going after different targets
Russia is ramping up production and rebuilding once dwindling stockpiles for big attacks, but it's unclear how long it can keep it up.www.businessinsider.com