E the massive
.308 Win
It's the same concept as the Thordsen. The top piece is just a cover for the buffer spring. There is no thumb hole.So if the stock is made as two separate pieces there is a legal difference between that and if it is molded as one and then cut? Rhetorical question; there is nothing in any law that says that makes a difference.
I also challenge anybody here to identify in any state law exactly what a thumbhole stock is (e.g hole size, what percent of the hole perimiter must be removed to keep it from being a thumbhole, etc.) and how 1) this doesn’t meet that definition and 2) Precisely what precludes it meeting that definition.
Lots of guessing and hoping. What if the gap was 1/32”? Still GTG? What if while shouldered the weight of the gun actually causes the buffer tube to gently touch the stock? Thumbhole now after all?