Want to END frivolous SCOTUS complaints ?

Grimscale

Grimscale

.338 Win Mag
Messages
7,425
Reaction score
14,376
Location
Rochester
I've been saying this all along.
False accusations MUST be met with legal action. Not only for the person, but for all the others "assisting" them.
I WANT to see D.F. in cuffs!
 
libertysnake

libertysnake

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,732
Reaction score
16,185
Location
New York
CaseHardened said:
PROSECUTE

After the Mid-Terms "Doctor" Ford and the rest MUST be brought up on CHARGES.

As well as ANTIFA assholes that assault people in Restaurants.

I'm not holding my breath, but Judge Kavanaugh has given me hope.
Click to expand...

This should be the case in general. When someone makes a claim they cannot support, it's slander or libel. If she wants to privately claim, or a limited capacity, that her claims are true -- fine. But by doing it on a national stage, without merit, is clearly meant to slander. She should be charged as such.

We have innocent men out there whose lives are getting ruined by this crap. Whether it be Anita Hill, Tawana Brawley, or this likely bullshit story from Ford. It's all in the same vein of claims which immediately destroy lives, which are dis-proven far too late after the damage has been done.

Lock. Her. Up.
 
Last edited:
Jmac00

Jmac00

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
18,486
Reaction score
50,500
Location
somewhere in America
Mark Levin levels the truth bomb on DemocRATS. DemocRATS know where the Montgomery County Sheriff's office is. they can march over there and file a complaint but they won't do it because they don't want an investigation.

 
Catskillkid

Catskillkid

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
10,013
Reaction score
18,300
Location
Livin' in a Gangsta's Paradise (AKA New York)
Jmac00 said:
Mark Levin levels the truth bomb on DemocRATS. DemocRATS know where the Montgomery County Sheriff's office is. they can march over there and file a complaint but they won't do it because they don't want an investigation.

Click to expand...

Yup. No Statute of Limitations on sexual assault in Maryland. At any time they could file charges but don't because they know the whole damn thing is horseshit and being deployed strictly for political purposes.
 
libertysnake

libertysnake

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,732
Reaction score
16,185
Location
New York
Catskillkid said:
Yup. No Statute of Limitations on sexual assault in Maryland. At any time they could file charges but don't because they know the whole damn thing is horseshit and being deployed strictly for political purposes.
Click to expand...

Even though the statute of limitations is unlimited in time for sexual assault, it still requires evidence to prove it happened beyond a reasonable doubt. Otherwise DAs would take any case on word of mouth.

So unlimited time to file is still bullshit. It just means the shitshow can start any time.
 
U

usamerican

.38 Special
Messages
35
Reaction score
28
Location
Fulton NY
The thing is it's next to impossible to prove a negative 37 years after the fact. Ford may well believe he really did it to her at this point. Either way, unless she comes out and admits she made it up to smear him it would be next to impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she is knowingly lying.

This is why we have (or used to have) statutes of limitations. Because nothing good can possibly come of bringing up allegations eons after the fact when all evidence either way is long gone and memory is unreliable. (100% sure my ass)

And that's why the D's broken record of why he didn't ask for an FBI investigation to "clear his name" because supposedly that's what they would want to do if they were innocent, is a red herring. The FBI can never clear his name. If his protestations of innocence, contemporaneous evidence, total lack of corroboration and in fact refutation hasn't cleared his name, nothing the FBI can possibly do will clear his name. And when it doesn't, they'll come back and damn him with an FBI investigation that only told us what we already know.

I can claim anyone who I had contact with 30 years ago did almost anything to me, if I just make it up and say I "can't remember" when or where it happened. How the FUCK do you prove you didn't do something to someone you met 30+ years ago but it could have been anywhere anytime?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top