Even instances in the Iraq war Ive spoke to vets , and most of the guys I spoke to did not like the 223 round at close range because sometimes it took a few shots before the guy got the message.
Even a .308 would take a few shots at close range if vitals aren't hit.
These military stories are just that. Stories.
No. What I'm saying is that an identical first shot in a .308 would have produced the same result yet they tell the story of how inadequate the 5.56 is.SO your calling these vets liars?? and you never met them.
And a .45 will knock your head clean off."""Even a .308 would take a few shots at close range if vitals aren't hit."""
Really? you had to shoot guys more than once with a 308? You get hit in the legs with 308 and its going to take your feet out from under you.
nobodys talking about being nicked , a solid strike .
No. What I'm saying is that an identical first shot in a .308 would have produced the same result yet they tell the story of how inadequate the 5.56 is.
And a .45 will knock your head clean off.
You said non lethal hit , ANY gun is going to drop a man hit melon . Im relaying what Im told from the field from several guys and every single one them said they did not like the round because it lacked stopping power. shoot a deer in the chest with a 556 at 500 yards and see what happens then shoot him with a 308 and going to see a big difference.
I think you're not understanding what he's saying. A 45 will blow your head clean off no matter where it hits you.