Yet another P320 unintentional discharge

Podmonkey

Podmonkey

.577 Tyrannosaur.
U.S. Military
Messages
21,588
Reaction score
30,166
Location
Cambria co. PA
I'm sure Glock is very grateful that they didn't have to deal with instantaneous internet dissemination in the 70s and 80s when their pistol had similar issues.
 
Edwardteach72

Edwardteach72

.475 A&M Magnum
U.S. Military
Messages
14,883
Reaction score
15,052
Location
New York
Podmonkey said:
I'm sure Glock is very grateful that they didn't have to deal with instantaneous internet dissemination in the 70s and 80s when their pistol had similar issues.
Click to expand...

Their issues ND these are actually AD..

Glock leg was a lot to do with NYPD officers being so used to long heavy DA triggers of their wheel guns they kept negligently discharging.

Sig is the opposite its the less common accidental discharge due to mechanical failure of the gun itself..

And glock had a small taste thanks to the gen 2 .40sw guns and the glocknade...


But that was even actually fixed rather quickly, that's why Gen 3 and 4s are a 3 pin design vs the 2 pin design of the gen 1/2
 
Edwardteach72

Edwardteach72

.475 A&M Magnum
U.S. Military
Messages
14,883
Reaction score
15,052
Location
New York
Also I love seeing articles of this and people saying "maybe it was a pre recall gun"

Um yea except that the recall upgrade actually made the civilian P320s get the firecontrol group that was developed and sold to the military aka already upgraded for the safety issue (leades me to believe sig new the 320s always had the issue and hoped they just wouldn't have to deal with it) and now here we are with a Canadian P320 (m18) NDing
 
togmaster

togmaster

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
13,321
Reaction score
20,119
Location
Buoy 42
Did you look at the video? They were using a modified 226 holster that allowed something to enter the trigger guard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top