The dominoes continue to fall. But I think this is foreshadowing to the fact that this will be more of a local to state enforced thing rather than a respected federal law. I'd still think about moving to a "free" state.
Unless something changes in the makeup of the Supreme Court, I can see this eventually making it there and being similarly ruled unConstitutional.But I think this is foreshadowing to the fact that this will be more of a local to state enforced thing rather than a respected federal law.
I agree 100% What I'm getting at is that localities or even at the state level they won't respect SC decisions. In the face of the Bruen decision the usual suspects are subverting the decision and doing whatever they want. With that decision how could one even think about proposing magazine/"AW" bans, red flag laws etc?Unless something changes in the makeup of the Supreme Court, I can see this eventually making it there and being similarly ruled unConstitutional.
Sooner, rather than later, a liberal judge will attempt to declare these infringements as constitutional and it will end up causing conflict in the judiciary. The S.C. will have to step in to make the final decision.
The question is how long before that happens, not IF it happens.
G-d bless Mr. Higgins.BOOM! Fireworks In Congress Over The 2nd Amendment!
Putting the fear of god in liberals
Huh...I thought they didn't have the votes? What rule change?
Hold the pressesBOOM! Fireworks In Congress Over The 2nd Amendment!
Putting the fear of god in liberals
House voted for it.![]()
House voted for it.![]()
Is the Chris Johnson listed supposed to be Chris Jacobs?
Wait, Kinzinger doesn't want it?
I can't find any NY Rep named Chris Johnson. FFS...typos
The turncoat isn't running for re election so he won't care what anybody wants. He knows he'd lose so he already bailed.This is Chris Jacobs district - the 27th. If this is you, I suggest you call or email his office. I am about 5 miles outside and his fucking website shut me out from emailing.
View attachment 167612