MothMan
.338 Win Mag
Judge ruled that the 2A does not protect semi automatic “killing macho”.
Judge: 2nd Amendment Does Not Protect Semiautomatic 'Killing Machines'
Judge: 2nd Amendment Does Not Protect Semiautomatic 'Killing Machines'
Yup, come get em.Well then, I suggest you start going door to door and round them up.
Damn there's some things the human eye just shouldn't see!How about banning the 'WOMR'??!!
'Weapons Of Mass Reproduction', also known as "hood rats"!!
View attachment 49713
Damn there's some things the human eye just shouldn't see!
WeaponsHow about banning the 'WOMR'??!!
'Weapons Of Mass Reproduction', also known as "hood rats"!!
View attachment 49713
Stanton opined that a ban on M-16s can stand under scrutiny of District of Columbia v. Heller(2008), because such guns are “outside the scope of the Second Amendment.”
I told you Scalia’s Trojan Horse that said that dangerous and unusual weapons weren’t protected would be used against us.
These tyrannical politicians infuriate me as much as you, but sadly its going to take more to get the great majority of patriots to take up arms. The build up to the 1st revolution had much harsher tyranny. Settlers were told they couldnt move west to try to better their lives because the king didnt want to lose taxes. They were forced to house and feed soldiers of the crown, etc.. sure their taxes were lower by % but they also got nothing for their taxes. If was a different type of world back then that was harsh. Today, if someone doesnt work the govt will feed, house, provide medical, and give them a damn mind control device (aka cell phone).This is so disgusting and infuriating. It most certainly does protect semi automatics. It protects belt fed, open bolt full auto machineguns too. The 2A was intended to codify the right of the people to possess the same arms as the standing army had. Specifically for the purpose of enabling rebellion against a government turned tyrannical. Well what point do you all think we are at? There is no other option than to take up arms and revolt against our corrupt and authoritarian government and to fight against all those that would support it. Full stop.
We will know no peace, no liberty until this is done.
The next round of fighting will look nothing like the last one.These tyrannical politicians infuriate me as much as you, but sadly its going to take more to get the great majority of patriots to take up arms. The build up to the 1st revolution had much harsher tyranny. Settlers were told they couldnt move west to try to better their lives because the king didnt want to lose taxes. They were forced to house and feed soldiers of the crown, etc.. sure their taxes were lower by % but they also got nothing for their taxes. If was a different type of world back then that was harsh. Today, if someone doesnt work the govt will feed, house, provide medical, and give them a damn mind control device (aka cell phone).
MOST people will tolerate ALOT of tyranny before risking their lives, and facing a corrupt judicial system. I wish this wasnt the case.
I’m guessing some really big dude who drives a truck will fire the first shot of the 2nd American Civil War.
There are no limitations on the second amendment. There is only the degree to which we're comfortable violating the second amendment as a country that is really going on.
The goal of 2A was to allow the militia (the people) to be armed on the same level as the average infantry soldier. The fact that regular citizens can't have the same functionality in their personal firearms as the military is garbage.
We should stop bullshitting ourselves as a country, and just call a damn constitutional convention to get clarity.
What clarity, fuck lot of "pro gun" or "pro 2a" people (hell we know they exist on here) will say that the 2A doesnt protect .... or that machine guns should be illegal...
Fixed it for you
Why post the same picture, tho?
If your attitude to everyone less focused than you with regard to the 2A is "fuck them", and everyone more focused than you says "fuck him too", what kind of fight do you think you'll be able to muster ?What clarity, fuck lot of "pro gun" or "pro 2a" people (hell we know they exist on here) will say that the 2A doesnt protect .... or that machine guns should be illegal...
If your attitude to everyone less focused than you with regard to the 2A is "fuck them", and everyone more focused than you says "fuck him too", what kind of fight do you think you'll be able to muster ?
Quite frankly, anyone who says we need to roll back *any small bit* of existing gun control is an ally, even if you don't agree how much.
Even people who think what we have is OK, but oppose anything new should be considered friendlies.
We allied with the Russians in WW2, not because we agreed with them, but because they were willing to fight the common enemy. If we hadn't we all would have lost. We are in the same sort of existential conflict now.
Your picture left out the holy scriptures