kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
There has been no evidence presented that this election was on the up-and-up.
No courts have ruled, or even agreed to hear cases attempting to prove this election was free of fraud.
Election Coverage And Results Thread
- Thread starter Dr. Evil
- Start date
No courts have ruled, or even agreed to hear cases attempting to prove this election was free of fraud.
We have election processes. It's up to a complainant to prove they weren't followed or that there was fraud. Not the other way around.
An example. If you sign a contract with someone, its up to you to prove they didn't follow it if that's what you are alleging. The default is that the contract was abided. The burden of proof would be on Trumps team to prove abnormalities in court, not the other way around.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Courts are where civilized people settle disputes. Wait til you see the alternative.
Robin
Robin
No need, rabid animals get put out.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
You really are a typical arrogant socialist asshole. I hope Joey gives you just what you deserve in an oh so socialist way.
Robin
Robin
JaguarJaguarGolf
6.5 Creedmoor
Acts of War are not settled in a courtroom.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
Well, when there is iron clad evidence that they weren't followed. Evidence that's a matter of public record like executive orders, but the courts rule that nobody has standing to even sue over it, what do you do then ?
You make the case and present your evidence in court. You find someone with standing, like... maybe ONE citizen in PA? They ahve all of these claimed witnesses like in the video 5-10 posts up in this thread, why not one of those people? The bottom line is that the Trump team has lost 50+ cases in court at this point. In none of those cases did they even prove *ONE* instance of fraud. Not one. That's why they lost or withdrew the cases. If they could prove fraud they'd win, but they either can't (because they don't actually have any evidence) of they haven't yet (which I doubt because why wait this long?).
Also, executive orders aren't evidence of voter fraud, they're executive orders. Nothing more, nothing less.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
I am specifically referring to the Texas lawsuit.
The facts are indisputable. The executive orders are black and white. The laws they violate are right there.
The courts flat out refused to look at the evidence.
What's your recourse when the courts refuse to even examine the evidence ?
You keep saying "present your evidence in court", as if that's even an option. The courts are refusing to allow it.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Thread
See new Tweets
Conversation
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv
JUST IN - Fulton county voting machines at a poll location are connected to WIFI both transmitting & receiving data **right now** according to a witness report at the #Georgia's Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing.
1:27 PM · Dec 30, 2020·Twitter Web App
5.9K
Retweets
366
Quote Tweets
12K
Likes
Replying to
@disclosetv
The witness continued that they have been able to "get into the system" and it is being documented at this very moment.
Witness at Georgia live senate hearing just hacked into the Fulton County voting machine via wifi!! Happening Now
I edited my post to expand on it more, not your fault you were probably replying while I was editing.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
Ok.
Executive orders aren’t evidence of fraud. They are evidence that the election was not conducted according to the legally required procedures that would allow you to detect fraud.
You can't burn all the evidence and then claim "well, there's no evidence so I guess no fraud".
That's like you claiming your records were all destroyed in a fire, but you're *sure* the bank owes you a million dollars.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
On Tuesday Jovan Pulitzer revealed the differences between ballots printed for Democrat precincts versus Republican precincts.
The Republican precincts had a barcode up in the right-hand corner.
The votes from two different areas are printed differently.
This caused GOP votes to get kicked out by the Dominion machines.
RAFFENSPERGER GETS CAUGHT: Georgia Ballots Were Printed DIFFERENTLY for GOP Areas vs. DEM Areas -- Election Was Rigged! (thegatewaypundit.com)
Celt
.450/400 Nitro Ex
The Republican precincts had a barcode up in the right-hand corner. All of them for both differences or just this one sample?
The votes from two different areas are printed differently. Different precincts will have different numbers. That's expected. How else do you think they have xx% precincts reporting on election day?
This caused GOP votes to get kicked out by the Dominion machines. Any proof of this? Seems just like a random theory. Did these precincts not get votes reported because if the barcode causes it not to read them then.....
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Just lovely. If this moves forward, we're fucked. Election virus vaccines, GMO's... One big freaking science experiment.
Biden Picks "Mr. Monsanto" Tom Vilsack to Head the USDA
Under Obama, Vilsack brought us cloned farm animals, lab-grown meat and more GMOs than any Agriculture Secretary before or after him “No More Malarkey” Joe Biden just nominated one of Monsanto’s best friends to head the US Department of Agriculture. During his eight years under Obama, Tom...
returntonow.net
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Im just the messenger man. Im not an expert on voting or ballots . the point was the republican districts had a bar code on thier ballots which ""they said "" was used to block the vote . I dont know, thats the allegation .
I cant for the life of me , think of a one good solid reason that republican districts had them but democratic districts did not., Is there a precedent of this?
Last edited:
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Members of Georgia’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing to study Georgia’s Election Laws, and the numerous voting irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.
The hearing comes after a Senate subcommittee held a hearing last week at the capitol to discuss perceived voting irregularities in November’s presidential election.
During the hearing witness Jovan Pulitzer was invited to testify on the irregularities in the November 3rd election.
On Tuesday Jovan Pulitzer revealed the differences between ballots printed for Democrat precincts versus Republican precincts.
The Republican precincts had a barcode up in the right-hand corner.
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, Award-Winning Inventor: (First Generation German Jewish American – Hebrew: יהוחנן[1]) also known as, Jovan or J Hutton Pulitzer (birth name Jeffry Jovan[2] Philyaw[3]), is a highly active technology start-up founder, best known for creating and patenting :CRQ (See Our Cue – Q Code Platform for Scan Commerce and Scan to Connect) has founded companies have included seed investment rounds ranging from $1.6m to over $250m with companies supported and funded by Dreamit Ventures, and Microventures to name a few lead investors. Currently actively involved in Augmented Reality, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Computer Vision, Health Care, Mobile Health Care, Engagement Technologies and Data Analytics industry. Pulitzer has also created numerous product companies that have generated over a billion dollars in consumer sales. His patents are known to grant fast and Pulitzer is regularly one of the top inventors month to month in the United States.
He can answer your questions better than I can
The hearing comes after a Senate subcommittee held a hearing last week at the capitol to discuss perceived voting irregularities in November’s presidential election.
During the hearing witness Jovan Pulitzer was invited to testify on the irregularities in the November 3rd election.
On Tuesday Jovan Pulitzer revealed the differences between ballots printed for Democrat precincts versus Republican precincts.
The Republican precincts had a barcode up in the right-hand corner.
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, Award-Winning Inventor: (First Generation German Jewish American – Hebrew: יהוחנן[1]) also known as, Jovan or J Hutton Pulitzer (birth name Jeffry Jovan[2] Philyaw[3]), is a highly active technology start-up founder, best known for creating and patenting :CRQ (See Our Cue – Q Code Platform for Scan Commerce and Scan to Connect) has founded companies have included seed investment rounds ranging from $1.6m to over $250m with companies supported and funded by Dreamit Ventures, and Microventures to name a few lead investors. Currently actively involved in Augmented Reality, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Computer Vision, Health Care, Mobile Health Care, Engagement Technologies and Data Analytics industry. Pulitzer has also created numerous product companies that have generated over a billion dollars in consumer sales. His patents are known to grant fast and Pulitzer is regularly one of the top inventors month to month in the United States.
He can answer your questions better than I can
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Now you tell me where he is wrong.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Sidney Powell: ‘Every Republican’ Should Stand Up for Trump if ‘RNC Hopes to Survive’
www.theepochtimes.com
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Number of GOP Congress Members to Object to Electoral College Votes Grows
www.theepochtimes.com
Then it is over for Biden!Number of GOP Congress Members to Object to Electoral College Votes Grows
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Senator Josh Hawley Announces Intent to Challenge January 6 Certification of Electors With Stunning Response From Walmart
Earlier today Missouri Senator Josh Hawley announced his intent to challenge the January 6th congressional certification of the electors. A group of approximately 30 House representatives, led by Mo Brooks, will be challenging from the lower chamber.
This sets up a dynamic where formal electoral challenges from both chambers of congress will be taking place based on evidence of election fraud in several key states. The objection will initiate a debate and roll-call vote to certify electors within both the House and Senate. Vice-President Mike Pence will preside over the debate in the Senate.
A combination of The Guarantee Clause (constitution) and the Electoral Count Act of 1887 (law), establishes the framework for some to argue a fraudulent 2020 election result can successfully be challenged during congressional certification on January 6, 2021. Thus five state legislatures -under Republican control- have sent dual-sets of electors to congress: Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Georgia and Pennsylvania.
[Article IV – Sec.4] The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence
The federal government, not the state government, ultimately holds the responsibility to protect the entire United States from foreign interference within the Guarantee Clause. This would seem to apply to foreign election interference. “ecause protection against invasion or domestic violence is normally available only from Congress and the President, the structure of this section suggests that the political branches have at least the primary duty to carry out its obligations.”
If DNI Ratcliffe produces a report (prior to January 6th) that outlines foreign interference in the election; and if the argument can be made the states with the contested (dual sets) of electors were subjects/targets of that interference; then a foundation to nullify the electors from the contested states is laid in congress
theconservativetreehouse.com
Earlier today Missouri Senator Josh Hawley announced his intent to challenge the January 6th congressional certification of the electors. A group of approximately 30 House representatives, led by Mo Brooks, will be challenging from the lower chamber.
This sets up a dynamic where formal electoral challenges from both chambers of congress will be taking place based on evidence of election fraud in several key states. The objection will initiate a debate and roll-call vote to certify electors within both the House and Senate. Vice-President Mike Pence will preside over the debate in the Senate.
A combination of The Guarantee Clause (constitution) and the Electoral Count Act of 1887 (law), establishes the framework for some to argue a fraudulent 2020 election result can successfully be challenged during congressional certification on January 6, 2021. Thus five state legislatures -under Republican control- have sent dual-sets of electors to congress: Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Georgia and Pennsylvania.
[Article IV – Sec.4] The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence
The federal government, not the state government, ultimately holds the responsibility to protect the entire United States from foreign interference within the Guarantee Clause. This would seem to apply to foreign election interference. “ecause protection against invasion or domestic violence is normally available only from Congress and the President, the structure of this section suggests that the political branches have at least the primary duty to carry out its obligations.”
If DNI Ratcliffe produces a report (prior to January 6th) that outlines foreign interference in the election; and if the argument can be made the states with the contested (dual sets) of electors were subjects/targets of that interference; then a foundation to nullify the electors from the contested states is laid in congress
Senator Josh Hawley Announces Intent to Challenge January 6 Certification of Electors, With Stunning Response From Walmart - The Last Refuge
Missouri Senator Josh Hawley announced his intent to challenge the January 6th congressional certification of the electors.
theconservativetreehouse.com
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Folks... we could be living in history .. one for the books
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
The Power of Pence - 12-30-2020
TEOTWAWKI inc.
.338 Win Mag
I have been saying for months now. Still not likely but, CONTINGENT ELECTION. I hope Pence follows the constitution and doesn't get Covid.
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
Yeah, hopefully Pence does say "nope" to all the swing states who violated their own election laws to get Biden in and he throws them out of the electoral vote count. I'm not holding my breath that he will, but it would seem like he has the justification to do so.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Op-ed December 30, 2020
Levin: On January 6, we learn whether our Constitution will hold
January 6 is the day we learn whether our Constitution will hold and whether congressional Republicans care.
The 2020 presidential election was, in several targeted battleground states, an unconstitutional electoral exercise. Even putting aside evidence of significant fraud, virtually none of which received a hearing by our courts, events leading up to and including the November national election constituted a radical and grave departure from the federal electoral system adopted by the framers of the Constitution and the state ratification conventions. Now, let's be clear: None of this matters to the Democrat Party, since it and its surrogates perpetrated these unconstitutional acts, as I shall soon explain
www.theblaze.com
Levin: On January 6, we learn whether our Constitution will hold
January 6 is the day we learn whether our Constitution will hold and whether congressional Republicans care.
The 2020 presidential election was, in several targeted battleground states, an unconstitutional electoral exercise. Even putting aside evidence of significant fraud, virtually none of which received a hearing by our courts, events leading up to and including the November national election constituted a radical and grave departure from the federal electoral system adopted by the framers of the Constitution and the state ratification conventions. Now, let's be clear: None of this matters to the Democrat Party, since it and its surrogates perpetrated these unconstitutional acts, as I shall soon explain
Levin: On January 6, we learn whether our Constitution will hold | Blaze Media
And whether congressional Republicans care
www.theblaze.com