Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Courts are where civilized people settle disputes. Wait til you see the alternative.
Robin
Robin
No need, rabid animals get put out.Courts are where civilized people settle disputes. Wait til you see the alternative.
Robin
Well, when there is iron clad evidence that they weren't followed. Evidence that's a matter of public record like executive orders, but the courts rule that nobody has standing to even sue over it, what do you do then ?We have election processes. It's up to a complainant to prove they weren't followed or that there was fraud. Not the other way around.
An example. If you sign a contract with someone, its up to you to prove they didn't follow it if that's what you are alleging. The default is that the contract was abided. The burden of proof would be on Trumps team to prove abnormalities in court, not the other way around.
Well, when there is iron clad evidence that they weren't followed. Evidence that's a matter of public record like executive orders, but the courts rule that nobody has standing to even sue over it, what do you do then ?
I am specifically referring to the Texas lawsuit.You make the case and present your evidence in court. The Trump team has lost 50+ cases in court at this point. In none of those cases did they even prove *ONE* instance of fraud. Not one. That's why they lost or withdrew the cases. If they could prove fraud they'd win, but they either can't (because they don't actually have any evidence) of they haven't yet (which I doubt because why wait this long?).
I edited my post to expand on it more, not your fault you were probably replying while I was editing.I am specifically referring to the Texas lawsuit.
The facts are indisputable. The executive orders are black and white. The laws they violate are right there.
The courts flat out refused to look at the evidence.
What's your recourse when the courts refuse to even examine the evidence ?
You keep saying "present your evidence in court", as if that's even an option. The courts are refusing to allow it.
Ok.I edited my post to expand on it more, not your fault you were probably replying while I was editing.
What's your recourse when the courts refuse to even examine the evidence ?
View attachment 101699
On Tuesday Jovan Pulitzer revealed the differences between ballots printed for Democrat precincts versus Republican precincts.
The Republican precincts had a barcode up in the right-hand corner.
The votes from two different areas are printed differently.
This caused GOP votes to get kicked out by the Dominion machines.
RAFFENSPERGER GETS CAUGHT: Georgia Ballots Were Printed DIFFERENTLY for GOP Areas vs. DEM Areas -- Election Was Rigged! (thegatewaypundit.com)
The Republican precincts had a barcode up in the right-hand corner. All of them for both differences or just this one sample?
The votes from two different areas are printed differently. Different precincts will have different numbers. That's expected. How else do you think they have xx% precincts reporting on election day?
This caused GOP votes to get kicked out by the Dominion machines. Any proof of this? Seems just like a random theory. Did these precincts not get votes reported because if the barcode causes it not to read them then.....
Then it is over for Biden!![]()
Number of GOP Congress Members to Object to Electoral College Votes Grows
www.theepochtimes.com
I have been saying for months now. Still not likely but, CONTINGENT ELECTION. I hope Pence follows the constitution and doesn't get Covid.The Power of Pence - 12-30-2020
www.theblaze.com