gunpoliticsny
6.5 Creedmoor
No, that's only about 1.5 weeks worth of rent.
NYSRPA v. Bruen, NY 2A Case Supreme Court case and decision
- Thread starter ManualF150
- Start date
No, that's only about 1.5 weeks worth of rent.
I stand corrected he was paying for his early 20s mistresses apartment in DC so yea your amount makes more sense
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Please post your facts not opinions! I suggest you reread
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
BerettaGuy
.308 Win
So you're a facter now? That case was 11 years ago. What did it do for NY and the 110-year-old Sullivan Law? I will post opinions anytime I so desire.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
NRA would be better off filing a suit that criminals have the RIGHT to carry outside there home ..
ohhh sorry .. they do ..
ohhh sorry .. they do ..
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
Heaven forbid some judge rules against a 150 yr old precedent because all the dumb ass judges on the bench got it wrong for 150 yrs ..
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
what was that last one .. some RIGHTS can be limited ... FKIN REALLY .. Heller case ..
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
I've been told that NRA has been substantially bankrolling this case.
Considering NYSRPA isn't doing full-press fundraising for legal expenses, and considering what NYSRPA's annual budget looks like after Tom King gets paid, I tend to believe it.
Its more likely that NRA initially didn't intend to submit a brief because they flushed their reputation down the crapper.
Considering NYSRPA isn't doing full-press fundraising for legal expenses, and considering what NYSRPA's annual budget looks like after Tom King gets paid, I tend to believe it.
Its more likely that NRA initially didn't intend to submit a brief because they flushed their reputation down the crapper.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
That is true, I know some here have a issue with NYSRPA as lead in these cases ( The NRA let's NYSRPA do the heavy lifting! ) But it is the NRA State affiliate representing state residents in a case against the State that would have Standing..
Standing to Sue Doctrine Law and Legal Definition
Standing to sue doctrine refers to a legal principle where a party is entitled to have a court decide his/her merits of the case. Under this doctrine, a party is entitled to obtain judicial resolution. In the U.S., there are many requirements that a party must establish to have standing before a federal court. The following are some of the requirements recognized under the doctrine:
1.Injury;
2.Causation;
3.Redressability.
The standing to sue doctrine is a jurisdictional issue which concerns power of federal courts to hear and decide cases. The doctrine is not concerned with ultimate merits of a case.[Washington Utilities & Transp. Com. v. FCC, 513 F.2d 1142 (9th Cir. 1975)].
gunpoliticsny
6.5 Creedmoor
Are you suggesting that Wayne spending nearly $5K a month on an apartment for a hot intern he's probably porking doesn't make for positive public relations for the Association?
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Yes it was 11 years ago, which is why this current case is going to the SCOTUS that is challenging a part of NYS pistol license (Sullivan Act) restricted and non-restricted licenses.
BerettaGuy
.308 Win
So are you saying that you believe that the restricted/non-restricted is the problem with Sullivan? You must have a "license" whether restricted or nonrestricted just to touch, handle shoot or own a handgun?
BerettaGuy
.308 Win
Actually, for the few that have actually been arrested for violation of the Sullivan Law, Zero went to court. You cannot appeal a guilty plea that was bargained down to community service. No conviction not appeal. No appeal no overturning the unconstitutional laws. Prosecutors know this that is why it has been on the books for 110 years.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
I agree but this case is about two Rensselaer County residents that were turned down for unrestricted CCW. I also believe that registering our pistols on said license is a violation of the 4th and 5th amendment but that is not part of this case.
Karpteach
6.5 Creedmoor
I am sure they are missing the money that NewYohkers used to give them. Every time they call I tell them when the NRA gives a fuck about NY and gets rid of LaPierre, I will start to dona again.
They mail me stuff pretty frequently. It goes right in the garbage.
gunpoliticsny
6.5 Creedmoor
NRA has over 200,000 members in the state. They take much more $$$ from us than they give back.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
That is exactly what I told them on their last recruitment phone call, along with, "the NRA has done NOTHING for us in New York." The response to that was, and you won't believe this but it is true,"you should get organized" to which I responded, "WTF is the NRA?!?!?!?!!?" ! It went on for a bit after that and I do not remember their last exact quote but it actually came across, well most of 'you people' are against the second amendment and want these laws, we just want your money. Seriously, that was the gist of it.
We need an NRA, we do not need what we have.
Robin
gunpoliticsny
6.5 Creedmoor
Who told you that? Was it just one of their telemarketers? There's lots that can be done right now for little to no money. They don't want to do anything because it requires having a relationship with Democrats. No matter what they say that is the reason we get the short end of the stick from them.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
It was a phone representative for the NRA trying to get me to renew my membership. I don't know her background.
Robin
Robin
Looks like a handful of House of Reps (175?) And the NY State Sheriff's Association have filed briefs in support of NYSRPA
There are a lot of organizations filing. Include a lot of affiliated organizations to include Law Enforcement. We make their jobs easier, IMHO. . This is affecting everyone who cares about the 2nd Amendment. A complete listing of filers can be found here.
The fact that it is 176 members of congress is a bit more than just some association
Really hoping for win like I'm sure everyone on here is.. and with the scope of the case now being pretty narrow I'm really hoping that Justic Thomas gets to write the majority opinion.
While it may not be a sweeping victory like other cases could have been for the whole 2A, with a win at SCOTUS and then if Thomas writes the opinion and gives it some teeth, it could have a wonderful trickle down effect, especially with all the cases waiting in the 9th Circuit
While it may not be a sweeping victory like other cases could have been for the whole 2A, with a win at SCOTUS and then if Thomas writes the opinion and gives it some teeth, it could have a wonderful trickle down effect, especially with all the cases waiting in the 9th Circuit
It's not just a couple of associations. A review of those organizations which filed amicus briefs is a bit of an eye-opener. Elected officials "sometimes" listen to their constituents. We are not talking about the mess up in Albany. We're talking about the general public who is finally waking up to the fact that it is up to individuals to protect themselves, rather than wait for a manufactured and wholly inadequate solution.
With the proliferation of 2A groups, emails, contests, safety and training seminars, and firearms purchases, I think that the people have had enough. I do not think that any politician wants to be on the wrong side of history but many of them have already traveled down that long abyss already.
With the proliferation of 2A groups, emails, contests, safety and training seminars, and firearms purchases, I think that the people have had enough. I do not think that any politician wants to be on the wrong side of history but many of them have already traveled down that long abyss already.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
can we find a list of there names .. i think we need to keep them ..
So its funny you shared this video
I was actually the one who messaged him about this
