Search results

Damn, you are absolutely right. I wasn't even thinking about all of that stuff. What a pain. He'll probably have to buy new mags for everything. LOL $$$$$$

No, every firearm must be registered to you on your NY permit. Send all paperwork to your county to get them aded first before you bring them into this state. Welcome to NY, you are under arrest.

Some good summary here for those that don't want to read it all:

I dont even watch these kinds of videos because I think they're pretty silly. All of the headlines are false and just designed for views. When it comes down to it we are essentially asking the 2nd circuit to overturn their own decision. Its never happening. They're not going to say oh ok Bruen...

Sorry sir. Unfortunately this is the equivalent to the guy ahead of you getting his speeding ticket dismissed while you are convicted of yours 10 minutes later.

This is good to see, however we already know how the 2nd circuit will rule on it. I don't think it stands a chance. And I don't think SCOTUS will pick it up, not anytime remotely soon anyway. Maybe in 10 years as is the current pace for them to hear these cases.

Yea I'm sorry to bear the bad news but it wasn't struck down. A low level judge said it was unconstitutional. It holds no weight in regards to anything. The next guy can be found guilty of the same tomorrow and it will be valid. Supreme Court is the lowest of state courts and their decisions do...

The whole court hears it I think. She just has first chance to deny or approve it. She does not have to ability to change Bruen.

Then by rule we can appeal to Thomas and every other justice. When the majority rule no only then is it a no.

My understanding is she can either have the case heard by the court or say no (which we then appeal to Thomas). I do not believe she can make a ruling on it by herself. She is only granting or denying to hear the case. If the case is heard, it is heard in front of all justices.

She has to make a decision soon in this type of situation from everything I've heard and the referring to the SCOTUS media guide. The date NY must respond is less than a week away which is also the date when she will make her decision I do believe. I say they/them because if she doesn't give us...

That's exactly what I'm getting at. Criminals get away with all kinds of things. I wouldn't be too worried abut a traffic citation. Throw it out and move on with your day. They have set the precedent, not us. Also why people aren't going to obey these travel bans is because of all of the covid...

Throw the ticket out your window when you drive off. Now what?

I guess what I mean is I wouldn't expect there to just be a vacate on the stay and nothing else. I would expect them to issue a well worded and stern opinion or guidance to accompany their decision. That guidance would steer the lower courts on how to proceed further with these cases. The...

If SCOTUS vacates the stay, how will that affect the 2nd Circuit's ultimate ruling? I think that is important. They need to send this message quickly and clearly.

So it's somewhat of a good sign that SCOTUS wants a response from NY on this. I don't know what their response can be that wouldn't directly challenge the Bruen decision. If they do that it's not going to go well for them. Calling out the court directly. The only problem we have from what I've...

How is it being enforced? By what mechanism? People can do as they please and commit crimes and there are little to no consequences so what teeth do they police have to enforce a driving ban? It's laughable. We all know and see that nothing happens to violent criminals so I wouldn't be too...

Wow, that's pretty crazy. The sad part is they are only hurting themselves and their community. How many of these stores aren't going to be able to open for a while now and how many will never re-open? As far as the shooting, from a quick search it appears that it is legal, if they can justify...

Good. Now if the dems decide they want to lower the voting age to 16 like they said they do, guess what else gets lowered to 16? Bingo! You're either an adult with rights or you're not.

If she denies, we can appeal to Thomas. Its not granting cert like in a regular case. They are asking them to look at their already settled case being stayed by lower courts. Its an emergency action. Dont believe so. She can agree to have SCOTUS take it or not. If not then see above. That is...

Same! He ruled in our favor on this one and even challenged the states lawyers asking along the lines of "are people more likely to be attacked and need a firearm in the woods in the middle of nowhere or on the subway?" He wasn't buying the states nonsense.

This isn't the same thing as hearing a case. I dont think so anyway. The case was decided and instructions were given / framework was set, and it is now being ignored. It' not like they're starting from scratch on a new case. They are saying here's what your court has decided and this is how the...

She may surprise us. Even though she is a liberal, these SCOTUS people tend to take this stuff very seriously. A lower court ignoring a decision from SCOTUS?! They treat the court as a very prestigious and respected institution. Just because she wasn't in the majority opinion doesn't mean she...

From what I've read, if she denies our request we can have another justice of our choosing review it also. It can then be reviewed over and over to other justices until the majority have ruled. Usually in order to avoid this long process in controversial cases the initial justice will just have...

All it takes is 1 election cycle.

I don't think you can impeach a justice because you dont like how they ruled on something. I think it would have to be for personal conduct and I dont see justice Thomas robbing a liquor store anytime soon.

Ok so I just read that if she denies us we can then have another Justice of our choice review it.

Anyone with knowledge on how long SCOTUS takes to make a decision on one of these emergency appeals?

They should take the pistol permits away from these people in the cities that are causing all of the trouble.

"The Second Circuit’s stay should be vacated in order to uphold the right of New Yorkers to keep and bear arms, as well as to vindicate the authority of this Court over the circuit courts." I like how SCOTUS is being called out here. The 2nd circuit is ignoring your decisions, even of this...

She can rule on her own however these kind of things are usually taken to the whole court so they appear proper and not controversial. Le't see if she does the right thing or not. I'm thinking not lol.

It goes to her by default. We must be in her covered zone. Each justice gets automatically assigned cases from certain areas or circuits. We just have that kind of luck in NY. This is what the people who say it will all work out for us in the end don't understand.

Until those states change too. Its all a matter of time. See Arizona. PA getting closer too.

Wow. When are the gun manufacturers and distributors going to start standing up for themselves? Every company named in this lawsuit should immediately cease all business with the government and police. Fuck em.

Agree. Now it's political. You have a gun so you are presumed to be conservative. You are the enemy. You must be punished.

I believe we're still waiting for a "special panel" to meet on the very first TRO that was stayed. They were supposed to "expedite" that panel, yet here we are like 2-3 months later and nothing. It's all a joke and a game. They will delay as long as they can. It's a win/win for them. They get...

Agree with others above, penetration is much more important. I have recently switched my carry load over to Critical Duty for the winter. People are wearing many layers and heavy carhart jackets. If the round doesn't reach vital organs the expansion isn't going to stop them. They'll be off to...

Well he did it anyway and there will be zero consequence for it and the citizens can't have real mags so..... Bruen was a waste of time and is proving to be quite useless.

More judges ignoring Bruen, it's a lost cause I'm sorry to say.

Didn't see this here. Another loss. TRO DENIED in Gazzola v. Hochul. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.135514/gov.uscourts.nynd.135514.42.0.pdf

Thank you. Not to sound paranoid but to me it kind of seems like a trap. Open the door for lots of gun owners to work as a security team, without the license. Then show up and arrest them for doing so. Now they can't carry at all. Anywhere. In fact after your arrest you'll get one of those...

Wouldn't you or your employer also have to be bonded and insured? It would at least be smart if not required. My line of thinking was more of ok something happens where you've been asked to be security for the church or whatever. In court when they put you on the stand and want to know what...

I actually had a friend that was thinking about something like this. He said what if his wife hires him as full time security for her and the kids then would he be able to carry in all of the sensitive locations if he's with them? I say it's a trap because I can see the state agents going into a...

I'm not sure how being appointed as armed security would work if you aren't licensed as armed security. Seems like a bad idea to me. Almost like they're setting a trap.

Another blow. On the bright side they granted our motion to expedite, so the next round of defeat will come quicker rather than later.

2nd Circuit issued a stay to the injunction today:

A new stay has been issued today. No more carrying in churches.

Nothing will come of it. If there's a ruling it will be stayed by the 2nd and they will never meet to make a ruling on it just like they have done with all the other cases. I'm done with the nonsense. And I'm done watching videos with click bait misleading titles.

That's what the people voted for. 75% increase if you don't have the ez pass. Might be time to cover your plates with mud or leaves or something.

Motion to expedite filed: