Search results

Yes. They weren't on anyones radar. They had no idea we could cary anywhere we wanted. They thought that only celebrities and the political elite could do that.

Tire spinning in the 1st degree. That's a felony in this state, now stick em up!

They should have just left everything alone. Sad to say but true.

Old news. Happened days ago.

no guarantee of that happening. They don't have a very good record of taking 2A cases. In fact they've taken very few (3 maybe?) in the prior many many many years. There is absolutely nothing saying they will take this just because they want to "get back" at the lower courts. I have more to say...

It's pretty irrelevant what Suddaby has to say at this point. The 2nd just overrides it anyway so..

"Law abiding"?

They never did anything. It was all an attempt to get standing. Last I heard that case kept getting bounced for problems with the paperwork they filed. Jokesters.

Make us do anything? They've already "made" quite a large number of people not carry anymore like they used to. I believe you had said this as well regarding church carry etc. So it's already been done. And as far as not enforcing it, that's what they told the court, but we know when the right...

Yep! I don't know very much about this legal stuff but from seeing how they handled the TRO, saying they were getting a panel together asap to review and rule, then never actually doing anything or even meeting on it, I have a good feeling that this will stand as is for 6 months to a year or...

BREAKING: STAY ISSUED, ILLEGAL TO CARRY ANYWHERE AGAIN We've seen their game plan already. Issue the stay then never actually meet to make a ruling. Pretty smart on them actually. They can effectively make the carry ban stay in force as law without ever actually ruling on it and needing to...

So reading this further suggests that they aren't going to enforce any of this because the minute they did their argument of no standing goes right out the window. Call their bluff. How many times are they going to say or suggest no enforcement before everyone just ignores them?

EMERGENCY STAY REQUESTED DUE TO THE "THREAT OF SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE IN INJURIES AND DEATH FROM GUN VIOLENCE" If its an emergency, why did they wait till now?

Good call. You're absolutely right.

Literally the very first line says it doesn't apply on private property not part of school grounds, so I think not.

Pistol permit exempts you from that. (B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to the possession of a firearm-- `(i) on private property not part of school grounds; `(ii) if the individual possessing the firearm is licensed to do so by the State in which the school zone is located or a...

The entire party has to be blown up or they will not win again. All of these old dinosaurs. Gone. Voting will shift more and more to mail in and probably via smartphone in the future, and there is only one party who that is going to help and even make it easier to cheat. Democrats will continue...

It's over. If you want to stay on the ride that's up to you. I'm getting off.

Well, can't say I'm surprised. I thought a few more races across the country would go red, but didn't think we had much of a chance in NY. As for me, I think I'm going to pull back, keep to myself more, not go out anymore. I'll adapt even more of an "I don't give a f*ck" attitude. I'm not gong...

An appeal has been filed. I expect a stay to be ordered shortly. Welcome to 4 more years. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.134829/gov.uscourts.nynd.134829.80.0.pdf

Court document: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nywd.142913/gov.uscourts.nywd.142913.52.0.pdf

Because it's just a district court ruling, not a circuit court or a Supreme Court. It only covers the district area. I'm not a lawyer but have been reading up a bunch on this stuff lately and that is my understanding.

Love this from the judge. "the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are the status quo, not 2022 legislation on the books for nine weeks." "The State requests a three-day stay pending appeal, which Plaintiffs oppose. The State's request is denied." "Legislative enactments may not eviscerate...

RESPONCE: MOTION TO DISMISS 11/3 https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.134829/gov.uscourts.nynd.134829.75.0_3.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.134829/gov.uscourts.nynd.134829.76.0.pdf

Hi everyone, I have a bit of a problem. I got a Safariland ALS holster with the paddle attachment after being told by a friend how great they were. The issue is I can't get it to fit my 1.75" belts. I've tried it with 3 of them and the hook just doesn't fit under the belt to secure it. The...

Sensitive locations that existed in 1791, sure. The new play is playing dumb about what was what back then as the link I just posted shows. Thats their new play. They aren't historians so how do they know?

More games being played by judges who won't do as they're told by SCOTUS. “we are not experts in what white, wealthy and male property owners thought about firearms regulation in 1791,” he said...

I don't know very much about these things but I would think the Supreme Court ruling would be the only settled law that matters.

I just looked up Prop 1. "4 billion, 200 million dollars" :tearsofjoy::tearsofjoy: How do people vote for this shit?! NO!

Am I still toast when the multimillion dollar settlement hits my bank account for plainly violating my civil rights that were clearly reaffirmed by the Supreme Court? It's not a second class right. Not anymore. It's no different than any other right. Qualified immunity won't apply either. Not...

They will. They will need to be very selective though. If they charge your average person who is just minding their business they are going to have problems. They will have to charge a career criminal or someone committing other crimes.

I guess I should have given some specific recommendations. I'm certainly not an expert, but in the few years I've been carrying I have learned a lot. I have 2 big boxes full of holsters that I've moved on from. I'm currently running a Henry Holster which I think is great. You can't go wrong with...

Because they get compliance without actually having to do anything. They can appease their base. They know 99% will just go along with it because they are "law-abiding". That's why I like the new shift to "peaceable persons". More and more people are not playing the game anymore. The Supreme...

The problem with that style is it prevents you from getting a full firing grip on the pistol. I would not recommend that design nor would I recommend an alien gear. Hybrid type holsters also do not allow the pistol to click in securely. Look into a holster with soft loops or DCC monoblock belt...

After hearing the state's Attorney say in court that they aren't enforcing any of this I guess I'm not going to really let it bother me much. It would be nice to have the decision though. I assume it won't be coming out over the weekend at all?

It says "notice of appeal" though.

It appears as if an appeal has been filed today, making me think the decision is out, although maybe not officially. This is either a screw up or good news for us.

Antonyuk v. Hochul amicus brief filed:

UPDATE FROM HEARNG: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.134829/gov.uscourts.nynd.134829.71.0.pdf