Ammo background checks to begin mid-September?
- Thread starter Beerman
- Start date
Old Jalopy
.40 S&W
I'm still looking for any sort of proof there was actually any case heard about this last Friday.
@goldie
Our laws are actually worse than CA. At least CA has some clarification on what parts make an AR compliant.
@goldie
Our laws are actually worse than CA. At least CA has some clarification on what parts make an AR compliant.
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
Worse for who? Us of course, they want them vague and this is by design. I’ve heard some people say this is all you need to do and it will make this rifle compliant but I don’t believe it.
Old Jalopy
.40 S&W
I know it's meant to be vague and ambiguous. If you think about it, the whole law and the unwillingness to come out and state what's OK and what isn't is actually entrapment. Which is illegal in its own right. But so are gun registries, yet here we are in a thread about a veiled gun registry using ammo background checks as the facade.
Beerman
6.5 Creedmoor
Not really correct. Laws and regulations (administrative laws) proscribe things which are unlawful, or violations. They do not describe, define, or outline what falls *within* the boundaries of that law or regulation.
Old Jalopy
.40 S&W
I'm not incorrect. I'm just in that area where the laws are there, but a person would be hard pressed to win a case. Like the cop who sits and waits outside a bar to catch someone drinking and driving. The problem is going before a judge who would uphold the statute. Without definition, technically there can be no law broken if no law is defined. But this is NY, and cops and judges get to make up the laws as they go, or at least so it seems.
A case brought by the New York State Firearms Association?
Old Jalopy
.40 S&W
From last Friday, yes.
I believe NYSFA to be a questionable organization, one that begs for money insisting they will change the Laws, take Cases to Court, and generally resolve all the anti-gun woes we're enduring, but to date they haven't accomplished jack schitt.
I have ZERO faith or trust, and if you do some investigating I expect you too will come to the same conclusion.
They may claim to be in it for the gun owners of NY, but I expect they're only in it for the money.
2WheelGnnr
6.5 Creedmoor
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California residents don’t have to pay for and pass a background check every time they buy bullets, a federal judge has ruled. The Tuesday ruling by U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez took effect immediately
if Cali cant do it we certainly dont have to do it!!!!
if Cali cant do it we certainly dont have to do it!!!!
Old Jalopy
.40 S&W
I don't have much trust in any of those organizations, really. I'll donate to GOA when I have a few bucks to spare. It bothers me that people are giving up hard-earned money while most of them say call, email, or write your senators to stop this. Um, that's why people give you money, jack asses. I've always felt if I'm paying for a service, I best get that service, or I won't continue to pay. I wouldn't give a mechanic $1,000 to fix my car for him to tell me to fix it myself. Maybe it's just me to expect to get what I pay for.