holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Now all of sudden you don't require proof to believe a story?
Last edited:
what Im saying is you have no proof. Show me the proof.
Ill give you one.... Where's the proof Lanza committed the crime?
Six?
He cannot. He will continue to berate you. He will call you names and poke fun. He absolutely will not show any evidence of what you asking because he does not have the intelligence to look for himself.,
Six?
That is my point exactly.To be fair it's not up to him, as he didn't make the incredible claim requiring incredible evidence that what the official story is is all a big lie.
If your evidence, is "just LOOK at the video (as if it shows anything blatantly obvious that we are just supposed to get) or a safety glass window not embedding it'self into a rubber sole of a shoe, the burden of proof has not been met.
Is it six?OUTSTANDING SIR!!!
Stay with me. How many kids were found on gene rosens lawn ? (its less than 7) that's 5 fingers plus two
ANDDDDDDDDDDDD he has no proof
Is it six?
Lets call it five. And....Im asking you! ( I think it was 5 ) but feel free to correct me if Im wrong
Lanzas body.
Survivors witnessed person matching Lanzas appearance.
Motive revenge/heroics.
Body of Lanzas mother.
Not sure what more you want for proof.
Lets call it five. And....
You have no body, you have no picture of a body you have no autopsy report of the body , and you even have no gravesite for the body
Actually they said he wore a mask and some said he had on boots others said he wore camouflage . Nobody ID lanza.
Actually they said he wore a mask and some said he had on boots others said he wore camouflage .
I have a feeling you will tell us.Excellent ( 5 or 6 depending on which version gene Rosen happened to be telling. Ok
How many surviving kids did officer Chapman find in Sotos closet?
To be fair it's not up to him, as he didn't make the incredible claim requiring incredible evidence that what the official story is is all a big lie.
No, Im asking him to prove what did happen, documented. what happened ? That shouldn't be hard if its a fact .
If your evidence, is "just LOOK at the video (as if it shows anything blatantly obvious that we are just supposed to get)
Its a police video . taken by the police showing two rifles were removed from the car .that's a fact not an theory. one of the rifles was not entered into the police inventory . That's also a fact.
or a safety glass window not embedding it'self into a rubber sole of a shoe, the burden of proof has not been met.
Yes that's true, its circumstantial. but it supports the idea.
Lots and lots of dead people have no gravesite., and you even have no gravesite for the body
Eyewitness testimony. Well established fact.
What do you expect? No errors? Unrealistic.
true, just another piece of evidence. by itself it doesn't say much.Lots and lots of dead people have no gravesite.
So what?
I have a feeling you will tell us.
Doesn't say much? Or,true, just another piece of evidence. by itself it doesn't say much.
Dead bodies of 1st graders everywhere. Dead Lanza. Dead Lanzas mother.Its a well established fact nobody at the school Saw Lanza. They saw someone wearing a mask wearing boots sneakers camouflage bulletproof vests depending on who you asked but nobody ID him. just a shooter.
I second that.Can we move past the stuff that doesn't say much, and instead discuss the things that say a whole bunch?
Is gene rosen in the top three most damning pieces of evidence?How many survieing kids were found in sotos closet? (google is your friend.)