As I've said before, CZ SP-01 is my favorite 9mm I own (only gun I own 2 of the same model). That said, I personally don't like the idea of the "tactical" decocker model. It's just that there's so many improvements that can be made to the standard trigger and other things, but you can't do any of that stuff with the decocker model.
To each thier own though, and congrats on a damn nice pistola !
The decocker isn't "tactical" its just the more logical control for a DA/SA pistol. Manual safeties are superfluous for this action.As I've said before, CZ SP-01 is my favorite 9mm I own (only gun I own 2 of the same model). That said, I personally don't like the idea of the "tactical" decocker model. It's just that there's so many improvements that can be made to the standard trigger and other things, but you can't do any of that stuff with the decocker model.
To each thier own though, and congrats on a damn nice pistola !
The decocker isn't "tactical"
My question is if you liked to carry cocked and locked wouldn't a single action be better?It is on the SP-01. I'm not calling it tactical in purpose, it's the CZ model designation where the only difference is the decocker.
I don't necessarily agree with you though anyway that it's a more logical control method. It's a personal choice. I carry mine cocked and locked because I grew up doing it that way and because I don't want a different trigger pull to mess up muscle memory.
My question is if you liked to carry cocked and locked wouldn't a single action be better?
If one prefered to carry the DA/SA decocked then the safety would be unnecessary in the first place.
To my mind-
Cocked & locked= single action (better, lighter, cleaner trigger pull)
Carry in double action mode= decocker(since carrying a DA/SA in single action mode is dangerous then a method of safely dropping the hammer is required)
Carrying in DA with a manual safety= redundant. And slow on target.
.........one of my two SP-01s is actually permanently converted to SAO, with comp hammer and flat trigger........
You can't actually even engage the safety on a SP-01 with the hammer down.
My point exactly, SA triggers are superior, in general, to DA/SA triggers in the SA mode.
If one is only ever going to use a DA/SA in the SA mode the DA mode is completely unnecessary.
The value of the DA/SA is one of safety and speed. No manual safety to fuddle with under stress but the long heavy initial trigger pull gives a good margin of protection against NDs.
Therfore I say a manual safety on a DA/SA os is completey unnecessary and redundant. Both features, the saftey itself or the DA pull, will never be used at the same time see?
I have made this argument before with others and had no success. I am not arguing your personal choice so much as bemoaning the relative lack of SAO options outside of 1911s and target guns. I'd like to see newer versions of the Hi Power and SIG P210 with all the modern refinements.Well.. yeah , but I still honestly don't understand the point you're trying to make. I'm not trying to be obstinate here..heh. If an SP-01 came from the factory with an SAO option then yeah , I'd pick that one. It doesn't.. but who cares if it has a DA function that never gets used ? No disadvantage in having and extra sear notch it and just not using it.
I have made this argument before with others and had no success. I am not arguing your personal choice so much as bemoaning the relative lack of SAO options outside of 1911s and target guns. I'd like to see newer versions of the Hi Power and SIG P210 with all the modern refinements.
I guess I'm just anal, I can't stand for presence of unnecessarily redundant features in things.
Well for a duty or CCW role I think the DA/SA is the most "panic proof" option, no safety to worry about like on a SA, and its far more forgiving than the typical striker fired gun.Oh.. well then we're actually in complete agreement. I'm not saying I like it (which is why I have a converted one, which is amazing in that config), and that's why I don;t like the decocker one but.. they come how they come. I'd prefer all my semis to be SAO really.
Anyway , sorry @Prudii , it was not my intent to derail your victory thread at all here. Congrats again on a sweet piece of steel
Well for a duty or CCW role I think the DA/SA is the most "panic proof" option, no safety to worry about like on a SA, and its far more forgiving than the typical striker fired gun.
Each action has its good points.
Anyway, @Prudii, I salute your choice of the "proper" DA/SA configuration
That is a kick ass gun and I'm all jelly of you.
What a shame
DA/SA is a dumbass resistant action. Everybody is subject to the occasional case of dumbassitis.Congrats on the CZ purchase. I bet it won't be your last !
I personally like having a decocker, especially for a CC.
One reason I have a P-07 & 09 in my rotation now. Their Omega trigger system is awesome and made even better with some Cajun love.
I've seen too many accidental discharges with SAO & striker pistols in my time and not a one with a DA pistol.
To each his own.
Nice pistol!!!!!
I have been doing a little USPSA and started with a CZ PCR which is a decocker pistol. I believe a DA/SA pistol needs to be in full hammer down at the start of the stage. The decocker lowers the hammer to half cock. At a local shoot it will likely go unnoticed. On the CZs the hammer spring can be lighted and helps make the DA to SA transition easier. I did not practice the transition and it screwed me up on the first few stages.
A few thoughts on the different firing systems
The DA/SA with a safety. They are not all the same CZ models (the ones Im familiar with) will only activate the safety with the hammer cocked, if the hammer is in the down position the safety can not be engaged. Great for the safety hating carriers, they can manually drop the hammer and not worries about the safety accidentally engaging. The pistol also can be carried cocked and locked, hammer cocked with the safety on. I dont see the point(opinion) in NYS with a 10 round limit I would consider a 9mm 1911 a better option because its thinner and would have a better trigger. In a free state you could have 15 rounds or so in a CZ, which cant be done with a 1911.
S&W 3rd gen, some Beretta 92s etc Have a decocker/safety switch. When the pistol is decocked the switch stays in the safe position so to fire the safety needs to be turned off. Most would decock and turn the safety off before holstering so it would be ready for action in DA mode. This is not popular with the safety hating folks. Having a pistol in DA mode with a safety on could be a good thing if a pistol is being used in an off body situation. For example the nightstand/glovebox pistol would take more than being picked up wrong to get an ND while half asleep or someone else who come across it. Im not saying to leave unsecured pistols laying around or you need this feature for a night stand gun, use your discretion.
Tanfoglio and maybe EAA have models with a safety that can be engaged with the hammer down but do not have a decocker.
CZ and others models with a decocker only. Pretty straight forward.
I know this is a touchy topic for some who think one system is best, but at the end of the day it only needs to be best for you!
Yes and a 16 flush fit I believe.SP01 has an 18 round mag dont it?
DA/SA is a dumbass resistant action. Everybody is subject to the occasional case of dumbassitis.
My understanding is most of the guys shooting these in comp have put the production legal spring and hammer kits in that lower the DA pull considerably and just make do with a heavy first shot instead of trying to cock the hammer whilst drawing.
Yes and a 16 flush fit I believe.
You totally misread all of that.There are tons of videos of expert dumbass's shooting themselves, others and having AD's with SA pistols.
Gun makers finally decided to try and keep their customers alive with the DA/SA option, as did LE in the US and overseas decades ago too.
Believe it or not, some people think it's pretty stupid to carry cocked & locked, especially the people who've witnessed or treated cases of the dumbass's who've shot themselves.
At least CZ gives you the option.
While a DA pull isn't the same as a SA pull, CZ DA/SA pistols can be worked on to make their DA pull smooth, reliable and dumbass safe with a decocker.
Calling people who don't want to accidentally shoot themselves or others( like the new CZ pistol owner here) dumbass's, is pretty dumbass.
No, I believe the 18 rounder fits flush in the SP01. The competition models with the magwell funnels have flush fitting 20 rounders!My understanding is most of the guys shooting these in comp have put the production legal spring and hammer kits in that lower the DA pull considerably and just make do with a heavy first shot instead of trying to cock the hammer whilst drawing.
Yes and a 16 flush fit I believe.
Anybody that thought CZs were cheap junk guns is betraying their casual interest status. CZ pistols have been the choice of pistolero connoisseurs for some time now.My one big issue with CZs at this point is that now people know how good they are.. so now they're expensive. I got my first SP-01 on super sale at a Gander Mountain many years ago, specifically because they couldn't get it sold. NY'ers just didn't know what they were, and nobody was buying steel framed guns. I distinctly remember mentioning I was a fan of CZs at ranges and such in NY in the early to mid 2000s and often getting responses like, "Aren't those cheap junk guns ?".
My one big issue with CZs at this point is that now people know how good they are.. so now they're expensive. I got my first SP-01 on super sale at a Gander Mountain many years ago, specifically because they couldn't get it sold. NY'ers just didn't know what they were, and nobody was buying steel framed guns. I distinctly remember mentioning I was a fan of CZs at ranges and such in NY in the early to mid 2000s and often getting responses like, "Aren't those cheap junk guns ?".
Anybody that thought CZs were cheap junk guns is betraying their casual interest status. CZ pistols have been the choice of pistolero connoisseurs for some time now.
I think the problem is that CZs have been "discovered" by the "not a Glock" gun hipster crowd.
I'm sorry for misinterpreting your post, late night.You totally misread all of that.