Bout fuckin time!Those masters of integrity over at the FBI have got off their worthless asses and decided to look into this election. By the way, the post right before this one is classic South Park
I don't know if it will be proven in court, but I am quite sure there was fraud on a massive enough scale to alter the outcome of the election.That any fraud there was will be enough to be proven in court and therefore result in a biden loss.
I'll bet they already wiped them with a cloth.Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. issued an order on Sunday to freeze ALL Dominion voting machines in the state of Georgia
Via Attorney Linn Wood: “Defendants are ordered to maintain the statue quo & are temporarily enjoined from wiping or resetting any voting machines in the State of Georgia until further order of the Court
BREAKING: Judge Timothy Batten Issues Order to Freeze All Dominion Machines in Georgia ...UPDATE: Judge Reverses Order Within Hours | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
BREAKING UPDATE— Judge Timothy C.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. issued an order on Sunday to freeze ALL Dominion voting machines in the state of Georgia
Via Attorney Linn Wood: “Defendants are ordered to maintain the statue quo & are temporarily enjoined from wiping or resetting any voting machines in the State of Georgia until further order of the Court
BREAKING: Judge Timothy Batten Issues Order to Freeze All Dominion Machines in Georgia ...UPDATE: Judge Reverses Order Within Hours | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
BREAKING UPDATE— Judge Timothy C.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Eh?
He has has his day in court.... Well 38 of them that is. Trump's legal team has almost unanimously failed. Judges Trump appointed laughed his cases out of the court and the 3rd circuit which is really conservative.
Rochester doesn’t have an illicit drug problem.I don't know if it will be proven in court, but I am quite sure there was fraud on a massive enough scale to alter the outcome of the election.
Just like I don't know if there will be a massive drug bust this weekend in Rochester, but I am sure there are plenty of sales going on.
I'm not sure what the legal term is. But for example, a woman walks into a police station and says she has been raped they don't tell her to leave because she has no proof. They ask many questions and if it seems credible they continue the investigation. Later in the investigation they need concrete proof.How can the court order the machines to be frozen with no evidence?
A fraud so big, so expansive, that after dozens of lawsuits and millions of dollars spent so far with recounts and in court, spearheaded by the POTUS...exactly zero counts of fraud proven in court thus far. Considering we all assume at least some degree of fraud somewhere that’s remarkable that not even, to date, proof of one person in a tow hall throwing away a ballot. Even I assume at some point something will be proven.I don't know if it will be proven in court, but I am quite sure there was fraud on a massive enough scale to alter the outcome of the election.
Just like I don't know if there will be a massive drug bust this weekend in Rochester, but I am sure there are plenty of sales going on.
How many drug busts in Rochester since the election have resulted in a conviction already ?A fraud so big, so expansive, that after dozens of lawsuits and millions of dollars spent so far with recounts and in court, spearheaded by the POTUS...exactly zero counts of fraud proven in court thus far. Considering we all assume at least some degree of fraud somewhere that’s remarkable that not even, to date, proof of one person in a tow hall throwing away a ballot. Even I assume at some point something will be proven.
Some have taken the emotionally comfortable route of only two outcomes:
1) trump wins this in court, thereby proving what they knew all along
or
2) trump loses in court, thereby proving the deep state is *even deeper* than many believed, thereby proving what they knew all along
This is classic conspiracy theory logic. It is infallible, impossible to ever prove as wrong; no matter how many times the promoter of the idea is proven incorrect, their incorrectness is actually support of yet a deeper, more vast conspiracy.
I'm not sure what the legal term is. But for example, a woman walks into a police station and says she has been raped they don't tell her to leave because she has no proof. They ask many questions and if it seems credible they continue the investigation. Later in the investigation they need concrete proof.
See the Judge let them out! No evidence! Ooops. Bail reform!How many drug busts in Rochester since the election have resulted in a conviction already ?
I guess there's no drug dealing going on then.
How many convictions were there over 9/11 ?
I guess those guys just acted alone then, with no outside help at all.
And why can't you guys admit there is a ton of evidence ?
What would you accept as evidence ?
All good points, but this nation spent $35 million and 2 1/2 years investigating Russian collusion with ZERO evidence and even with the media and Democrats talking heads telling us every god damn day that there was MAJOR proof coming any day it turned out to be complete BULLSHIT! We at least need to let this play out just for piece of mind and to restore some trust in our election process.A fraud so big, so expansive, that after dozens of lawsuits and millions of dollars spent so far with recounts and in court, spearheaded by the POTUS...exactly zero counts of fraud proven in court thus far. Considering we all assume at least some degree of fraud somewhere that’s remarkable that not even, to date, proof of one person in a tow hall throwing away a ballot. Even I assume at some point something will be proven.
Some have taken the emotionally comfortable route of only two outcomes:
1) trump wins this in court, thereby proving what they knew all along
or
2) trump loses in court, thereby proving the deep state is *even deeper* than many believed, thereby proving what they knew all along
This is classic conspiracy theory logic. It is infallible, impossible to ever prove as wrong; no matter how many times the promoter of the idea is proven incorrect, their incorrectness is actually support of yet a deeper, more vast conspiracy. Like throwing scrap under the table trump is happy to promote this. Just this morning he offered the idea that the FBI and DOJ are also in on this.
A fraud so big, so expansive, that after dozens of lawsuits and millions of dollars spent so far with recounts and in court, spearheaded by the POTUS...exactly zero counts of fraud proven in court thus far. Considering we all assume at least some degree of fraud somewhere that’s remarkable that not even, to date, proof of one person in a tow hall throwing away a ballot. Even I assume at some point something will be proven.
Some have taken the emotionally comfortable route of only two outcomes:
1) trump wins this in court, thereby proving what they knew all along
or
2) trump loses in court, thereby proving the deep state is *even deeper* than many believed, thereby proving what they knew all along
This is classic conspiracy theory logic. It is infallible, impossible to ever prove as wrong; no matter how many times the promoter of the idea is proven incorrect, their incorrectness is actually support of yet a deeper, more vast conspiracy. Like throwing scrap under the table trump is happy to promote this. Just this morning he offered the idea that the FBI and DOJ are also in on this.
All should remember that the terminology “conspiracy theory” was created by the CIA to slander people who expressed disbelief that Oswald acted alone.
A fraud so big, so expansive, that after dozens of lawsuits and millions of dollars spent so far with recounts and in court, spearheaded by the POTUS...exactly zero counts of fraud proven in court thus far. Considering we all assume at least some degree of fraud somewhere that’s remarkable that not even, to date, proof of one person in a tow hall throwing away a ballot. Even I assume at some point something will be proven.
Do you realize the reason nothing has been proven in court yet is because there hasn't been a trial? There have been petitions and filings, but that's not where allegations are "proven".A fraud so big, so expansive, that after dozens of lawsuits and millions of dollars spent so far with recounts and in court, spearheaded by the POTUS...exactly zero counts of fraud proven in court thus far. Considering we all assume at least some degree of fraud somewhere that’s remarkable that not even, to date, proof of one person in a tow hall throwing away a ballot. Even I assume at some point something will be proven.
Some have taken the emotionally comfortable route of only two outcomes:
1) trump wins this in court, thereby proving what they knew all along
or
2) trump loses in court, thereby proving the deep state is *even deeper* than many believed, thereby proving what they knew all along
This is classic conspiracy theory logic. It is infallible, impossible to ever prove as wrong; no matter how many times the promoter of the idea is proven incorrect, their incorrectness is actually support of yet a deeper, more vast conspiracy. Like throwing scrap under the table trump is happy to promote this. Just this morning he offered the idea that the FBI and DOJ are also in on this.
I kind of referred to what I will bring up a few pages ago. I am really curious what makes you tick @Blimey. For some time now there are quite a few of us that feel there is no way the election played out like it did LEGALLY. We post different links in the hope of seeing some of the information come to fruition and back up our suspicions. I believe we understand in this political climate sadly it is an uphill battle but it is one we are willing to fight for various reasons. You know how we feel and we certainly know how you feel. OK, so here comes my question.A fraud so big, so expansive, that after dozens of lawsuits and millions of dollars spent so far with recounts and in court, spearheaded by the POTUS...exactly zero counts of fraud proven in court thus far. Considering we all assume at least some degree of fraud somewhere that’s remarkable that not even, to date, proof of one person in a tow hall throwing away a ballot. Even I assume at some point something will be proven.
Some have taken the emotionally comfortable route of only two outcomes:
1) trump wins this in court, thereby proving what they knew all along
or
2) trump loses in court, thereby proving the deep state is *even deeper* than many believed, thereby proving what they knew all along
This is classic conspiracy theory logic. It is infallible, impossible to ever prove as wrong; no matter how many times the promoter of the idea is proven incorrect, their incorrectness is actually support of yet a deeper, more vast conspiracy. Like throwing scrap under the table trump is happy to promote this. Just this morning he offered the idea that the FBI and DOJ are also in on this.
9. Got his panties in a twist after getting called out for basing his vote for president on keeping his wife happy (and not on who he felt is the better candidate), and has become argumentative as a coping mechanism.I kind of referred to what I will bring up a few pages ago. I am really curious what makes you tick @Blimey. For some time now there are quite a few of us that feel there is no way the election played out like it did LEGALLY. We post different links in the hope of seeing some of the information come to fruition and back up our suspicions. I believe we understand in this political climate sadly it is an uphill battle but it is one we are willing to fight for various reasons. You know how we feel and we certainly know how you feel. OK, so here comes my question.
You seem to come on here daily and do your best to piss on our cornflakes and remind us how much of a stretch some of these things are and how foolish we are. Time after time I know I can count on your negative posts regarding the links we post and discussion some of us have. I am sure there are probably others that agree with you (besides our resident lib/Dem) and roll their eyes at some of our posts yet you are basically the only one that feels the need to antagonize with your Debbie Downer thoughts. Based on my observation over the weeks I can only conclude that this is for some, any or all of the following reasons. I am just curious which one(s) if any are responsible.
1. You are bored and don't have much to do.
2. You don't like some of us and enjoy the confrontation.
3. Deep down you are pretty much a dick and get off feeling superior.
4. You are trying to show us our shortcomings and trying to save us from ourselves.
5. You think you are smarter than many on here and feel the need to prove it.
6. Some of the above.
7. All of the above.
8. None of the above/other.
So for the sake of really trying to figure out why you feel the need to continuously come here, ridicule others and voice your side KNOWING how many of us feel about the situation, why do you do what you do? Again, why not just either ignore the thread or come on, laugh to yourself and shake your head in disbelief and just move the fuck on? Thanks ahead of time for humoring me.