Election Coverage And Results Thread

[SonOfSun]

Nice try but a weak straw man argument. You really do operate right out of the left's playbook. Instead of refuting the argument/statistics with what's wrong or missing you go right to character assassination. No different than the snowflakes who cry "yeah but Trump is _______" (insert hysterical invective of your choice). The snark and diversion is infantile.

My post seems to have gone above your head, let me spell it out for you a little clearer:

I can't dispute his statistics BECAUSE HE WON'T SHARE HIS METHODOLGY OR DATA.

When someone makes claims with charts they put together themselves but will not provide the data or what logic they used in creating their model I'm ultra skeptical of them. Doubly so when it comes from a race-scapegoating liar who was banned from MIT due to his claims.

 

[SonOfSun]

The exact response we'd expect from a leftist, progressive piece of shit. Calling your opponent something you know factually what you are, an asshole.

Don't worry, I followed it up with a so it's ok, asshole.

I figured the meth and heels would have given it away as a joke, you might want to read the post I replied to, then you'd understand why I put it there, asshole

 

[holdover]

Words are a very powerful tool. Notice how the POS Barr says 'DOJ Has No Evidence Of Fraud'. He didn't say there IS NO evidence, just that they have no evidence. Lawyers are schooled to choose their words wisely.

AG Barr to AP: DOJ Has No Evidence of Fraud That Would Change Election Outcome

If the DOJ hasn't looked into it yet, they haven't found any evidence.

 

[Phazer]

AG Barr to AP: DOJ Has No Evidence of Fraud That Would Change Election Outcome

Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

www.newsmax.com

Wheww....I'm glad that the DOJ has given their opinion. Now we can put all of this behind us.

 

[Dr. Evil]

Wheww....I'm glad that the DOJ has given their opinion. Now we can put all of this behind us.

Yup. Big load off my mind that everything was above board. On to the next dilemma.

 

[holdover]

DOJ makes no 'overt moves' to investigate claims of widespread voter fraud conspiracy


Even though U.S. Attorney General William Barr has loosened restrictions on investigating voter fraud, there has been no public announcement of any investigation, according to a story by the Washington Post.

“The Justice Department has met President Trump’s fantastical claims of widespread voter fraud with two weeks of skeptical silence,” the Washington Post reported in a story published Saturday.

The Department of Justice is “not taking any overt moves” to investigate claims of a worldwide conspiracy to steal the election lobbed by Trump lawyers in statements outside of court, the article said.

DOJ makes no 'overt moves' to investigate claims of widespread voter fraud conspiracy (abajournal.com)




Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election .


Oh ya think??

 

[SonOfSun]

If the DOJ hasn't looked into it yet, they haven't found any evidence.

From the Newsmax article I'm not under impression that they are yet to look into it, namely this part seems to imply they have been looking into it:

"In an interview with The Associated Press, Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election. "​

 

[holdover]

So your saying there is no evidence presented so far worth investigating?

 

[Defilade]

What is the reason for all vote counting to cease that night? Answers?? That NEVER happened before.

 

[SonOfSun]

So your saying there is no evidence presented so far worth investigating?

I'm saying that if someone is willing to make statements under oath that they observed what they perceived at the time to be fraudulent activity it should absolutely be investigated.

I'm also saying based on the article stating, " U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received ", it sounds like they have been investigating the things they have received, but they've uncovered nothing at any large scale. Is it possible some people committed fraud, and it's probably very likely. However it's also most likely a very very few individuals acting independently. I certainly want anyone that tries to defraud our elections charged, proven guilty in court, and punished accordingly... however a couple yahoos doing something illegal isn't the same thing as widespread and systematic fraud.

 

[kev74]

The exact response we'd expect from a leftist, progressive piece of shit. Calling your opponent something you know factually what you are, an asshole.

Don't worry, I followed it up with a so it's ok, asshole.

The "ignore" button works wonders. Just sayin'.

 

[masterswimmer]

The "ignore" button works wonders. Just sayin'.

You be right kev, you be right. Done.

 

[SonOfSun]

The "ignore" button works wonders. Just sayin'.

Saves me the time of getting the reply notifications too.

+1, would recommend.

 

[kev74]

You be right kev, you be right. Done.

I use it very sparingly, and still appreciate it greatly.

 

[masterswimmer]

I use it very sparingly, and still appreciate it greatly.

I think I've got three total on iggy now. So very sparingly here too.

 

[holdover]

I'm saying that if someone is willing to make statements under oath that they observed what they perceived at the time to be fraudulent activity it should absolutely be investigated.

You would think that would be the case. Seems the policy of DOJ is a bit different.

Even though U.S. Attorney General William Barr has loosened restrictions on investigating voter fraud, there has been no public announcement of any investigation, according to a story by the Washington Post.

The Department of Justice is “not taking any overt moves” to investigate claims of a worldwide conspiracy to steal the election lobbed by Trump lawyers in statements outside of court, the article said.

Basicly Barr is saying Gulliani, Lin wood, and Sydney Powell are full of shit without really looking into it.

 

[Celt]

My big concern is that in the end this will be silenced ( just as big media and big Tech is currently doing) because people will claim the damage to our Republic would be irreparable if it was actually uncovered that there was such a widespread cheating.

I think anybody with half a brain would realize that this was not a fair election. It's incomprehensible that Joe Biden got that many more votes than Trump when he is such an unlikeable character. Not to mention all the other information and witnesses that keep coming forward.

This was definitely a coup, and anyone who doesn't think so, simply doesn't want to think so just because they don't like Trump.

 

[FrankenCub]

because people will claim the damage to our Republic would be irreparable if it was actually uncovered that there was such a widespread cheating.

Which is absolutely true. Unfortunately, I fear the cover up far more than the actual damage the fraud created.

 

[Defilade]

That's not evidence, lol. Saying, "If I put some numbers here the chart fits my model" doesn't mean shit.

Did he provide his model? No.

I could make a model that behaves any way I want it to and say look if I put these numbers it now fits. Unless he's sharing his methodology and model, then it doesn't mean anything. Especially given this guys past absurd claims that got him revoked from presenting at MIT and then claiming it was all just racism and his face should be on postage, lol.




See above. I work with numbers and data all day. I'd like to see his methodology and/or model, my guess is he won't share it.

So he is making up Fraud on the Fraud..Got it!

 

[Calculon]

My post seems to have gone above your head, let me spell it out for you a little clearer:

I can't dispute his statistics BECAUSE HE WON'T SHARE HIS METHODOLGY OR DATA.

When someone make claims with charts they put together themselves but will not provide the data I'm ultra skeptical of them. Doubly so when it comes from a race-scapegoating liar who was banned from MIT due to his claims.

He provided his model and methodology to Trump's team. He can defend it in court as that's the only place that matters. He certainly isn't required to provide it to anyone when the data he used is available publicly for anyone to use to support or debunk his claim.

 

[Defilade]

Georgia Secretary Of State Opens 250 Investigations Into ‘Credible Claims Of Illegal Voting’

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, announced on Monday that the state of Georgia has opened 250 investigations into “credible claims of illegal voting and violation of state election law.” At a press conference, Raffensperger was careful to qualify his statements...

www.dailywire.com

 

[Defilade]

Pennsylvania Tells Top Court There Is ‘No Conceivable Justification’ for Judge’s Certification Order

 

[holdover]

 

[Grimscale]

The post that my text was a response to didn't seem to understand how counting votes and subsequently joining the numbers together to determine a winner works. If the direction I provided is difficult to understand, a review in addition would be a good suggestion.

Also, my horse is a high-high horse, not just any old high horse. It's wearing heels and smoking meth, give em' proper respects, asshole.

I'm trying to correlate your comment with the previous statement that Biden could not have won the "record number of votes".

As far as I was aware, the "record number of votes" was the popular vote. ie: each person counted. That information can be tabulated in many ways. The statement was that he "won" only 16.7% of the Counties in the United States.

so you're telling us that 16.7% of the Counties in the United States account for over 80 milion people?

 

[masterswimmer]

My big concern is that in the end this will be silenced ( just as big media and big Tech is currently doing) because people will claim the damage to our Republic would be irreparable if it was actually uncovered that there was such a widespread cheating.

With all due respect celt, and I say that with the utmost sincerity, the damage to our Republic would be irreparable if it is NOT uncovered that there was widespread cheating and they allow creepy Joe to be sworn in. At that point we'll never have an election by the people ever again.

This is a turning point in the history of America. Trump MUST prevail or we go down in history as a country, a Constitutional Republic that survived only 244 years.

 

[Dr. Evil]

 

[kev74]

 

[Calculon]

Nothing to see here. Pallets of prepackaged pre filled ballots shipped from NY to PA.

 

[kev74]

 

[kev74]