I think it's crazy when people don't carry with a round chambered. And just like the article says if you're not comfortable then you should get the training you need so that you are. If you're going to carry a weapon for personal protection then you should be trained and prepared properly. It doesn't mean you have to be trained like a Navy SEAL, but you have to be comfortable and proficient.
The typical answer to why they carried this way; "I don't want the gun to go off accidentally.
That is incorrect (sort of). The only safety the Israelis were worried about was the lack of a drop safety. That’s why they carried empty. Shitty old pistols without a drop safety.Glad you saw the light. Many think Israeli Draw was a good thing because the Israelis did it. The only reason thet did it was for uniformity in training their troops because they had a ragtag inventory of different pistols at one time. Some with safeties and others without. So in order to not have to train on every gun and lose muscle memory, every gun was carried with the chamber empty and the safety off if it was equipped with one.
Our own military requires it unless you are an MP on duty or leaving the wire.
A man's gun. AKA da/da hammer fired and keep one in the pipe.
Sig Sauers?That is incorrect (sort of). The only safety the Israelis were worried about was the lack of a drop safety. That’s why they carried empty. Shitty old pistols without a drop safety.
I think it was anything he picked up back In the day. Doubt they still carry empty.Sig Sauers?
Glocks are geigh.hammer for the win.Because real men are afraid that it might go off so they need more poundage.
I bet you are one of those that in a gunfight if you get a failure to fire you'll pull the trigger again and get yourself killed.Glocks are geigh.hammer for the win.
I bet not sir. Not been killed yet. I also bet you pull the trigger Again because you only shoot to break in the wife’s gun. It’s instinct to pull trigger again. My gun will setI bet you are one of those that in a gunfight if you get a failure to fire you'll pull the trigger again and get yourself killed.
Haha. It isn't instinct if you are trained for proper remedial action.I bet not sir. Not been killed yet. I also bet you pull the trigger Again because you only shoot to break in the wife’s gun. It’s instinct to pull trigger again. My gun will set
Off the primer on second pull more times than not but I don’t carry fmj nato rock primer crap so I’m good! Now I see why Edward left you..
I hear you on the spouse. Sometimes training goes out the window during stress. Not everyone is a highly trained expert like me.Haha. It isn't instinct if you are trained for proper remedial action.
As far as Edward goes, I won't comment. He's been pretty unstable lately. Takes basic questions as threats and retaliates. I'm scared.
How do you know that? How are you certain the guy would have just walked and not executed them anyway?He would have been better off just letting that guy walk, but hindsight is always 20/20.
Yeah, I don't "know" that, but with only 2 options to begin with (draw or not draw) and having chose to draw (which obviously pissed off the bad guy) it couldn't have ended any worse. Perhaps if worded "He "MAY" have been better off just letting that guy walk?" We;ll never really know...How do you know that? How are you certain the guy would have just walked and not executed them anyway?
I don't care what the platform is. I dislike this smug attitude. I'll concede that on the whole, trained properly, carrying with one in the chamber is almost axiomatically an advantage in a self-defense situation. That doesn't mean that everyone who ever carries with an empty chamber is wrong and needs to be corrected. Least of all due to some Monday morning quarterback jockeying over footage of very rare scenarios.Sometimes the way you decide is right is not the most optimal way. You may think it's right and discredit someone because it's from YouTube but the fact of the matter is that no professional agency or any police department ever makes their officers carry unchambered. There's a valid reason for that.
The military does it behind the wire because you have a lot of immature idiot kids in the military but once outside the wire and outside the safety of the wire, a round is chambered even for those idiot kids too.
I find it funny that people discredit facts because they are from YouTube yet they wouldn't discredit them if they were from a magazine or from the mouth of some fat dude at a gun shop or a cop.
Either the facts are correct or they are not. The platform where these facts are spoken from are irrelevant.
Carrying chambered is faster no matter how you slice it. You carry a gun because you wanted an advantage. No? You practice as much as you can because you want to be as proficient as you can and you want an advantage? No? You carry chambered because you want an advantage? No? Or does it end at just carrying?I don't care what the platform is. I dislike this smug attitude. I'll concede that on the whole, trained properly, carrying with one in the chamber is almost axiomatically an advantage in a self-defense situation. That doesn't mean that everyone who ever carries with an empty chamber is wrong and needs to be corrected. Least of all due to some Monday morning quarterback jockeying over footage of very rare scenarios.
Just because you have a difference in opinion doesn't mean that he is a "pudd" for it.Spiritual fitness .. sorry this guy is a pudd, karma is going to bite him in the ass one day.