Not surprised.Airborne drives one also. Couple of lesbos we are. Haha I prefer smart consumers. Subbies are the best!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not surprised.Airborne drives one also. Couple of lesbos we are. Haha I prefer smart consumers. Subbies are the best!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Curious. Why .45 for restrictive states? I'm not getting the logic.
Again with the frying pans...I see. But in keeping true to the thread of Caliber Wars, wouldn't having ten rounds of a milder recoiling caliber enable faster follow-up shots on a target?
I mean a .45 caliber hole is bigger but what if other variables comes into play where follow-up shots are critical and the gun comes back on target faster with a milder caliber. IE... mutiple attackers, moving targets, ect.
Then you have other variables such as an attacker taking cover behind a hard barrier that the slower speed of the heavier caliber cannot penetrate.
I get clowned all the time. I'm laughing all the way to the bank. These clowns get new trucks and don't need a tuck most of the time.No BS, I drove a Crosstrek for 2 years. Traded it in last week. I used to get clowned on about the Suburu at work by some of the guys
I like .357 Sig on a Duty Pistol but on a subcompact with a 3 inch barrel, the flash, concussion, and recoil indoors is a negative.357SIG.
It's a valid argument. Hard barriers are very much something to consider when an attacker is shooting at you from behind one.Again with the frying pans...
It's a good car. No doubt about that. It handles better than my Jeep does in the snow.I get clowned all the time. I'm laughing all the way to the bank. These clowns get new trucks and don't need a tuck most of the time.
I wear a 20" cast iron frying pan as protection.It's a valid argument. Hard barriers are very much something to consider when an attacker is shooting at you from behind one.
I like .357 Sig on a Duty Pistol but on a subcompact with a 3 inch barrel, the flash, concussion, and recoil indoors is a negative.
There are 9mm rounds that almost emulate a .357 Sig. At least the watered down versions ammo manufacturers are making.
The .357 sig recoil is not really that bad in my opinion. But that was from a glock 31 (not exactly a carry gun). It is a loud fer though.I can't show you any 9mm that matches .357 Sig nor did I ever claim it did. I said that +P+ almost reaches the watered down velocities that many manufacturers put out there for the. 357 Sig.
As far as the frying pans go, I'll stick to the 9mm that'll penetrate pans of average depth.
There's no need for me to go to a caliber with more recoil. The benefit doesn't outweigh the negatives.
The place I order from was out of the +p. The nypd uses that and we all know they miss alot. I figure it must be the ammo's fault.Why not+ P? Too much recoil?
With Federal HST, standard pressure 124 gr actually penetrates a few inches more in gel than the same round in +P from the tests I've seen. The sightly larger expansion the +P creates was enough to make it penetrate about 3 inches less in gel.The place I order from was out of the +p. The nypd uses that and we all know they miss alot. I figure it must be the ammo's fault.
With Federal HST, standard pressure 124 gr actually penetrates a few inches more in gel than the same round in +P from the tests I've seen. The sightly larger expansion the +P creates was enough to make it penetrate about 3 inches less in gel.
The standard pressure rounds are what I carry.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean as far as +P and as far as 147 gr's go but not all +P bullets behave the same and not all bullets of a certain grain behave the same when they are hollow points. Bullet construction of hollow points vary from manufacturer to manufacturer affecting how a round behaves.I was going to say that the reason I use +P is I carry a 3" barrel 9mm, and most tests are conducted with service length barrels (4-5").
However, checking the Luckygunner test specs, they intentionally used what sidearms that most might consider as average "concealed carry" length barrels. Didn't see that before; thus, I would be more likely to get more penetration (4" more) than wanted and about equal expansion from the +P Federal 9mm HST than the standard pressure.
I'll have to look into the standard pressure HST 147 gr. Through and throughs are not good in a potential gunfight with innocents around.
Barrel lengths and weapons used in test:
"Short Barreled Handguns
This is one area where we intentionally deviated from the typical FBI test. Ballistics testing is most often conducted with full size or “service size” handguns with barrel lengths of at least 4”. However, most armed citizens carry smaller guns with shorter barrels, which means the bullets they fire will fly at a lower velocity than what is advertised by the ammo manufacturer. Ballistics data gathered using full size barrels can be misleading if applied to these small concealable pistols. We ran our tests with popular concealable handguns with barrel lengths we think are more representative of what the average citizen is actually carrying. The test guns used were as follows:
- .380 ACP: Glock 42, 3.25-inch barrel
- 9mm: Smith & Wesson M&P9c, 3.5-inch barrel
- .40 S&W: Glock 27, 3.42-inch barrel
- .45 ACP: Kahr CW45, 3.64-inch barrel"
No BS, I drove a Crosstrek for 2 years. Traded it in last week. I used to get clowned on about the Suburu at work by some of the guys
I wear a 20" cast iron frying pan as protection.