Fourth Circuit overturns pro-gun ruling

Celt · Feb 22, 2017

Bob said:
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that these "black robed activists" simply do not care. If they understood (or cared about) the concept of the four boxes, they would understand (or care about) the Constitution enough to know that they have failed it and the people it is supposed to protect.

When i say afraid, its all liberals who are afraid of armed citizens. Its called "projection", they dont trust themselves with guns (and rightly so, just look at their countless meltdowns), so they think everyone is irrational, and illogical as them. Plus, they love control, and they have less with us owning guns.

I dont literally think they are shaking in their robes, its a much deeper, sinister mindset.

Bob · Feb 22, 2017

Celt said:
When i say afraid, its all liberals who are afraid of armed citizens. Its called "projection", they dont trust themselves with guns (and rightly so, just look at their countless meltdowns), so they think everyone is irrational, and illogical as them. Plus, they love control, and they have less with us owning guns.

I dont literally think they are shaking in their robes, its a much deeper, sinister mindset.

And to them, I say "come and take them"
I like my guns like they like their immigrants - undocumented.

Automan21 · Feb 22, 2017

Criticalt said:
I thought no government entity could take our rights away. We need to stick together or we are screwed. Gun owners need to just ignore illegal, unconstitutional rulings. When a law abiding citizen is arrested for disobeying these bans, millions of us need to come to their rescue. Money, lawsuits, lawyers....etc. We need to flood the courts but we cant if nobody is willing to get arrested and if nobody is willing to stick together.
There are millions of gun owners, if we stuck together as one unit, we WOULD win.
Look what a few thousand libs have done recently, just by sticking together.
Of course we wont be burning cities or rioting, we will just be joining together to save our rights.
If we arent ALL ready to help, we are done for.

The problem is that we are all too damn lawful and nobody is willing to get arrested.
I would do it but im 100% positive ZERO gun owners would assist me. If even a million gun owners pitched in $5, id carry an AR down 5th ave in NYC tomorrow.
Then if we could get a few hundred thousand others to do the same, the courts would have to deal with it once and for all.

Dude you are so right. A lot of us owners are fearful of getting arrested for just attending a rally since they can say anything we did was grounds for license revocation. But I am down for NYC rally. I have a crispy $5 bill ready and waiting.

Cooolone · Feb 22, 2017

I'll say it 100x, no 1000x...

Law, and laws... Only exist, when the citizens VOLUNTARILY comply with them... If the unjust laws are ignored, then they don't have any weight.

How many people you know ticketed for jaywalking? Hmmmmm... Could you imagine the courts dockets processing those violations? Lmao... Just drive in any highway and you'll see hundreds of drivers choosing to ignore lawful established speed limits, etc. So why do people treat a RIGHT with such less affection?

But as mentioned, Law Abiding Citizens are just that, they won't, or don't want to break any law, in order to protest it. Conversely to those breaking laws during demonstrations to protest the treatment of law breaking immigrants! Interesting to say the least.

So it's a conundrum, a befuddlement, that no real change ever comes by waiting for it to happen, which in all probability it won't unless you do something about it as change, true change only is taken, not given. And yes, by force... Not the force you may think, like this Presidential election, that so many learned people's are still having difficulty processing because they cannot understand what happened, that a Revolution took place right before their eyes and they don't believe what they have seen. They little understand the forces that were at play, one man did.

But change won't take place by bitching about it online, or by jawing about it over coffee... Change takes action and sacrifice. And laws only exist if people willingly volunteer to comply with them. So worry if you want, but laws mean little and take 2nd place to RIGHTS, as RIGHTS are not dispensed by decree, or whim. They are yours, but only if you assert them, fight for them, act in them, protect them... : )

Burzum · Feb 22, 2017

Just remember all these retarded degenerates that we see protesting every day, also hate gun rights, the globalist/progressives are going to win, we are SOL.

WHY, because:
1) they own the elite of BOTH parties, the media, and Hollywood,
2) except for Trump, they have the billionaire class (Sorass, Bloomturd, Kochs, Gates, Zuckerburg, etc.),
3) they can afford to get arrested, most of us cannot,
4) they know how to protest, Conservatives just know how to bitch and complain when it comes to gun rights.

We are soooooooooooooooo screwed.

redtail · Feb 22, 2017

spat · Feb 25, 2017

JosERW said:
Because they will lose. The Second Circuit ruled "aw" are illegal. Done. You lose.

Its not the 2nd circuit we need to win. We already know the 2nd circuit will uphold a ban on sharp sticks if given the opportunity.

But, for us, they are a necessary speed bump on the way to SCOTUS, and the only ruling they made was about what you can't ban, they have never upheld a ban on any militarily useful arm.

Phazer · Feb 25, 2017

spat said:
We already know the 2nd circuit will uphold a ban on sharp sticks if given the opportunity.

What? They relaxed their regulations? Since when are we allowed to have sharp sticks? I'm still researching the legality of owning unregistered bats and golf clubs in Westchester.

ProgSpear · Feb 25, 2017

fartgamer said:
The 4th Circuit is known to be somewhat conservative as courts go.........I meant was

The result of that anti-American POS muslim commie rat bastard Obama packing the lower courts with progressives for the last 8 years.

Bob · Feb 25, 2017

JosERW said:
This decision is so agregious how can they let it stand? Are there any cases left? I don't see anymore bans coming down in any other circuits any time soon.

Last month, the Massachusetts NRA affiliate (GOAL) filed a suit in US District Court against the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and their assault weapons ban.

Podmonkey · Feb 27, 2017

JosERW said:
Except we can't pick and choose when a case is heard by SCOTUS. Once this is denied it's lost forever. We're out of cases as far as I know.

If the US AG argues in favor of a case being heard does that add weight? We're honestly on the brink of losing our rights forever. There won't be a federal ban for decades, if ever and there are no state or local bans coming anytime soon to challenge.

The decision is so morally bankrupt that to let it stand would be a travesty of justice. I feel so hopeless.

That is an incorrect attitude. Accept that we are on the brink of a civil war. If we can't defend and retain our unalienable rights within the system then we must do so with force. We cannot rely or depend on the courts. We cannot let the liberal establishment determine our fate.

Fourth Circuit overturns pro-gun ruling

Celt

.338 Win Mag

Bob

6.5 Creedmoor

Automan21

.44 mag

Cooolone

.338 Win Mag

Burzum

.223 Rem

redtail

.308 Win

JosERW

.40 S&W

JosERW

.40 S&W

spat

.700 Nitro Express

Phazer

.450/400 Nitro Ex

ProgSpear

.338 Win Mag

Bob

6.5 Creedmoor

JosERW

.40 S&W

Podmonkey

.577 Tyrannosaur.