I think you will like what you see.When I get the time to watch it, I will respond appropriately with my unbiased, professional opinion.
I couldn't have said it better myself. Speed penetrates. 185 gr+ P would have done the job, but people ignorantly pick the .230 gr because the number is bigger.
No, because it does a similar amount of soft tissue damage, is softer shooting, easier to contol, doesn't batter the gun and is more readily available.I couldn't have said it better myself. Speed penetrates. 185 gr+ P would have done the job, but people ignorantly pick the .230 gr because the number is bigger.
I disagree. Choosing a .230 gr is a deliberate handicap. Barrier penetration on a pistol is a must. Not every shot is going to be straight on into a chest and not every hard barrier that needs to be penetrated is going to have a rifle nearby.No, because it does a similar amount of soft tissue damage, is softer shooting, easier to contol, doesn't batter the gun and is more readily available.
Hard barrier penetration of pistol calibers is like comparing cargo carrying capacities of supercars. Differences exist but are outside the strengths of the relevant platforms. Got substantial stuff to shoot through? You need a rifle.
I couldn't have said it better myself. Speed penetrates. 185 gr+ P would have done the job, but people ignorantly pick the .230 gr because the number is bigger.
Correct. Good catch!185 is greater than .230
I don't want to try and catch either of them.I disagree. Choosing a .230 gr is a deliberate handicap. Barrier penetration on a pistol is a must. Not every shot is going to be straight on into a chest and not every hard barrier that needs to be penetrated is going to have a rifle nearby.
At less than 25 yards, you are talking about less than an inch in elevation.I don't want to try and catch either of them.
For a gun with fixed sights, there is definitely going to be a point of impact change between 185 and 230 grain. I'd prefer hitting what I'm aiming at over a perceived difference in penetration.
If I'm shooting at a knight in armor, I'd be happy with either.
I disagree, I think the 230gr is the best weight for the .45. This will need to be tested somehow. If I only had the time I would love to do my own ballistic gel tests.I disagree. Choosing a .230 gr is a deliberate handicap. Barrier penetration on a pistol is a must. Not every shot is going to be straight on into a chest and not every hard barrier that needs to be penetrated is going to have a rifle nearby.
For soft tissue, the. .230 gr will penetrate further in a FMJ configuration than the .185 gr due to weight but either will have complete passthrough through a fragile human body. Hell a .380 ACP FMJ will have complete passthrough.I disagree, I think the 230gr is the best weight for the .45. This will need to be tested somehow. If I only had the time I would love to do my own ballistic gel tests.
Calls himself a professional and keeps posting .230 and .185......For soft tissue, the. .230 gr will penetrate further in a FMJ configuration than the .185 gr due to weight but either will have complete passthrough through a fragile human body. Hell a .380 ACP FMJ will have complete passthrough.
In a hollow point configuration, the .185 gr or the .230 gr will penetrate within inches of each other depending on the load and hollow point construction. They are both designed to stop at 12 to 18 inches in gel.
Stop being like the liberal newscasters pirate.Calls himself a professional and keeps posting .230 and .185......
The .165 Gr .45 would be Wills favorite.
If it penetrates the FBI minimum.....Yes.The .165 Gr .45 would be Wills favorite.
It was moving at around 1250 fps. Frying pan killer.If it penetrates the FBI minimum.....Yes.
But if it stops short of the FBI minimum in soft tissue, that is no bueno.It was moving at around 1250 fps. Frying pan killer.
Blah Blah FBI Blah...But if it stops short of the FBI minimum in soft tissue, that is no bueno.
That block doesn't look refrigerated but if accurate, 16 inches is not too shabby.Blah Blah FBI Blah...
haha I can't find any gel tests on the old Cor-bon 165+p .45. That's what I have.
Bigger diameter. But then again, .40 holds more.If you wanted to launch 165gr projectiles why wouldn't you have gotten a .40 S&W?
That's my point. I wonder if 165gr .45s have too little mass behind too much diameter causing insufficient penetration. And capacity usaully trumps bullet weight. In general volume of fire is desirable over effectiveness of fire, within reasonable limits.Bigger diameter. But then again, .40 holds more.
Not always in this dump of a state...Bigger diameter. But then again, .40 holds more.