maverick52
.223 Rem
Watching and waiting.
GOA files lawsuits against NYS
- Thread starter Edwardteach72
- Start date
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
spat
.700 Nitro Express
The 80s had the best movies.
"Do you realize what the street value of this mountain is ?"
"He learned English from listening to Howard Cosell"
maverick52
.223 Rem
That was never written in the law. Here we go with more legal tricks
camper4lyfe
.308 Win
There's no such thing as a lifetime license in NY anymore, and the training and social media is still in effect for the first renewal after the law takes effect.
camper4lyfe
.308 Win
That's not true, though. SAFE made all permits a 5 year permit and removed the no expiration portion.
So how do we handle things going forward, as NYS in their reply to this lawsuit has claimed that our permits upstate NEVER expire, and that existing CCW holders are not subject to the 18 hours training and live fire, the social media checks, etc.?
camper4lyfe
.308 Win
Odd, isn't it? It sounds like the state doesn't even know its own laws.
pjzwtl
.308 Win
Odd isn’t the word I would use but ..yea. To be honest her response is begging for a legal bitch slap. The lack of intellect behind the states response is telling.
camper4lyfe
.308 Win
Most definitely. The "odd" came with a heavy dose of sarcasm.
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Note the word renew!!
** NB Effective September 4, 2022
(d) Licenses issued under paragraph (f) of subdivision two of this
section shall be recertified or renewed in the same form and manner as
otherwise required by this subdivision, provided however, that such
licenses shall be recertified or renewed every three years following the
issuance of such license. For licenses issued prior to the effective
date of this paragraph that were issued more than three years prior to
such date, or will expire in less than one year from such date shall be
recertified or renewed within one year of such date.
Note the words recertified/recertification!!
(ii) persons who were licensed to
possess a pistol or revolver prior to the effective date of this
paragraph are not required to have completed a firearms safety course
and test, provided, however, persons with a license issued under
paragraph (f) of subdivision two of this section prior to the effective
date of the laws of two thousand twenty-two which amended this paragraph
shall be required to complete the training required by subdivision
nineteen of this section prior to the recertification of such license;
Well first. We wait to see if the judge grants GOA the injunction
gunpoliticsny
6.5 Creedmoor
Tish James hasn't sent out a self-aggrandizing presser defending Hochul's law from GOA's lawsuit.
This is not an oversight.
This is not an oversight.
whatupbo
9mm
Knowing this piece of shit state, my money is on no injunction….. hope I’m wrong.
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
...and in completely unrelated Knews:
Gun Owners of America
@GunOwners
In GOA and
@gunfoundation
's case in Virginia fighting universal background checks, the Virginia Attorney General claims the government can "requir[e] the registration of all guns," and then cites historical context from 1631—160 years before the United States even existed.
1:32 PM · Feb 24, 2023
·
12.8K
Views
68
Retweets
3
Quote Tweets
254
Likes
Gun Owners of America
@GunOwners
In GOA and
@gunfoundation
's case in Virginia fighting universal background checks, the Virginia Attorney General claims the government can "requir[e] the registration of all guns," and then cites historical context from 1631—160 years before the United States even existed.
1:32 PM · Feb 24, 2023
·
12.8K
Views
68
Retweets
3
Quote Tweets
254
Likes
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
...and in completely unrelated Knews:
Gun Owners of America
@GunOwners
In GOA and
@gunfoundation
's case in Virginia fighting universal background checks, the Virginia Attorney General claims the government can "requir[e] the registration of all guns," and then cites historical context from 1631—160 years before the United States even existed.
1:32 PM · Feb 24, 2023
·
12.8K
Views
68
Retweets
3
Quote Tweets
254
Likes
was not a State back then .. territories are not included
Virginia Attorney General .. blowing smoke wasting $$$ they are going to loose
PS Virginia Attorney General may wanna try using wounded knee also for his gun control .. only certain types of people can have guns ..
that was around 1890 i think
ManualF150
.308 Win
The Constitution didn't exist at that time. They can't use that as legitimate evidence according to Bruen.
No offense but even that wouldn't be a legitimate argument as it's post 1868
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
All I see is the British did this so we can as well. Isn’t there a reason we are independent from the British now?
ManualF150
.308 Win
Where is Paul Revere when you need him yelling: "The British are coming!"...
DoOver
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
We’re right here and we’ve been warning of all this stuff for years now.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
We’re right here and we’ve been warning of all this stuff for years now.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
SHOCKING ADMISSION: NY 2A Defendant Admits to US Federal Appeals Court that New Gun Law Violates 2A
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit will be hearing oral argument in 5 pending Second Amendment cases on March 20, 2023. As part of these cases, 2A challenges have been brought against New York State’s ban on firearms in places of worship such as churches and synagogues. The District Attorney for the County of Niagara was sued to enjoin his office from enforcing the law banning guns in places of worship and today he filed a legal brief in the Court of Appeals conceding that the NY law was unconstitutional under the Second Amendment and NYSRPA v. Bruen. Mark Smith breaks it down.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
there getting hit from all sides now .. EPA got smacked .. now the DOE ..
"The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for 3 hours in a major case about whether the President and his Department of Education have the legal authority to act unilaterally to cancel student loan debt---all without receiving additional statutory consent from Congress. The Supreme Court's question strongly suggest that they view major questions such as student loan forgiveness as requiring Congress to act. Mark Smith breaks this down and what the Court's questions indicate will be the future of regulatory actions by the ATF. "
"The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for 3 hours in a major case about whether the President and his Department of Education have the legal authority to act unilaterally to cancel student loan debt---all without receiving additional statutory consent from Congress. The Supreme Court's question strongly suggest that they view major questions such as student loan forgiveness as requiring Congress to act. Mark Smith breaks this down and what the Court's questions indicate will be the future of regulatory actions by the ATF. "
John Stark
.44 mag
How many freaking times do I have to say it?
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
This largely means nothing. This is covered under other suits and other defendants. I’m glad he had the balls to say it though.
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
ManualF150
.308 Win
So is anyone with National Grid.