The m17 is a p320 no? If they didn't get immunity imagine the fallout.Seems like a shifty play by Sig.
The m17 is a p320 no? If they didn't get immunity imagine the fallout.Seems like a shifty play by Sig.
M17 is the full sized P320, the M18 is the smaller or "officer" size.The m17 is a p320 no? If they didn't get immunity imagine the fallout.
M17 is the full sized P320, the M18 is the smaller or "officer" size.
Fallout or not, they shouldn't have been given immunity. If Sig handled the issue properly from jump they wouldn't have been facing this backlash. Instead, they deflected and blamed everyone and everything else.
I personally will never carry any of my P320s ever again.
Using Ball Ammo!And that's why they call him one ball Jim
Technically it is a 3rd party research and testing firm that has been working with the FBI since the Miami-Dade thing for the purposes of firearms research.So, all of a sudden the FBI is a credible source? WTF? I’m living in Crazyland!
I had one, and RXP model what comes with the red dot. I sold it along with a Walther PPQ to fund the purchase of another pistol and it's related accessories. This being just prior to this whole issue began ramping up.Everybody has an agenda. What’s yours? Bandwagon master, groupie, or just a Sig hater? Let me know how much you’re selling your 320 collection for. Don’t even tell me that you have ZERO experience with one.
Glock leg lives!
There are so many videos, reports and independent studies about the P320 now only low IQ individuals or those that have for some reason invested an emotional stake into their purchasing decisions refuse to see the truth of the matter.
That's the thing, the P320, Like other pistols, including such as the S&W M&P and Walther PDP, use a fully covked striker. Such guns are essential Single Action designs. In these designs there are still multiple layers of passive safeties to mitigate the risk of an unintentional discharge. Also consider some testing has shown that even the partially cocked stiker of the Glock can still have enough force to fore a cartridge.I wouldn't carry an old 1911 fully cocked using appendix carry so I would I carry the Sig p320 that way? A Glock? Yes. It requires a depress of the trigger to complete the cocking for the sear to release. It doesn't have enough tension to set of a round when loaded and racked.
I know. I threw a grenade![]()
![]()
But to each their own. You want to point a loaded Sig p320 at your junk after all the videos and the company trying to address the issue while maintaining there isn't one, that all you baby. Not me. I don't posses that kind of faith in that Sig model
That's the thing, the P320, Like other pistols, including such as the S&W M&P and Walther PDP, use a fully covked striker. Such guns are essential Single Action designs. In these designs there are still multiple layers of passive safeties to mitigate the risk of an unintentional discharge. Also consider some testing has shown that even the partially cocked stiker of the Glock can still have enough force to fore a cartridge.
With the P320 however you have a flawed design from the outset with a truly bizarre sear design that is floating atop springs combined with further flawed design of the stiker block lever and all compounded yet further with poor QC and tolerances that allow excessive play between tge components and possibly rendering these passive safeties to become disabled or otherwise ineffective. And YET FURTHER exacerbating all the above are crudely manufactured, out of spec components made from poor quality materials in third world nations.
The P320 is a shitstorm of failure at multiple levels.
This re-evaluation is beginning now I think.The Military and Law enforcement better reevalute the way they test their pistols. Obviously it is a flawed system to allow this through.